Weinuo Qu, Jing Wang, Jiali Li, Yaqi Shen, Yang Peng, Daoyu Hu, Zhen Li
{"title":"简化视场DWI与常规DWI在基于机器学习的直肠癌淋巴血管浸润评估中的比较","authors":"Weinuo Qu, Jing Wang, Jiali Li, Yaqi Shen, Yang Peng, Daoyu Hu, Zhen Li","doi":"10.1002/mp.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is an important prognostic factor of rectal cancer and influences treatment planning. MRI-based radiomic features provide phenotypic information on tumor biological behaviors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>We aimed to compare the performance of different models derived from reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging (rDWI) for prediction of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in comparison with conventional DWI (fDWI) and high-resolution T2-weighted imaging (T2WI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Eighty-six rectal cancer patients received rDWI, fDWI, and high-resolution T2WI at 3T. Whole-lesion ROI delineations were performed on above sequences for radiomic feature extractions (60 and 26 patients in training and test cohorts, respectively). A baseline logistic model was applied to all sequences to compare their diagnostic performances in predicting LVI. Different machine learning models, including eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF) were further utilized on rDWI to assess LVI status. The performances of different models from these sequences and visual interpretation by radiologists were evaluated and compared for LVI prediction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Radiomic models from DWI sequences performed better than visual interpretation for diagnosing LVI (<i>p </i>= 0.002–0.036). In logistics models, radiomics derived from rDWI outperformed those from T2WI (<i>z </i>= 2.064, <i>p </i>= 0.039) in differentiating-LVI. AUC of rDWI model was higher than that of fDWI but the difference was not statistically significant (<i>z </i>= 1.006, <i>p </i>= 0.315). No significant differences of performance were detected between fDWI and T2WI (<i>p </i>> 0.05). The best performance, with an AUC of 0.957, was achieved by the RF model derived from rDWI in the training cohort, with a significant difference noted between the RF and logistic models for LVI prediction (<i>z </i>= 2.250, <i>p </i>= 0.032).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>RDWI-derived radiomics performed better than T2WI and fDWI in differentiating LVI. Radiomic models based on rDWI were promising tools for facilitating clinical assessment of LVI status in rectal cancer.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of reduced field-of-view DWI with conventional DWI for machine learning-based assessment of lymphovascular invasion in rectal cancer\",\"authors\":\"Weinuo Qu, Jing Wang, Jiali Li, Yaqi Shen, Yang Peng, Daoyu Hu, Zhen Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mp.70015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is an important prognostic factor of rectal cancer and influences treatment planning. MRI-based radiomic features provide phenotypic information on tumor biological behaviors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>We aimed to compare the performance of different models derived from reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging (rDWI) for prediction of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in comparison with conventional DWI (fDWI) and high-resolution T2-weighted imaging (T2WI).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eighty-six rectal cancer patients received rDWI, fDWI, and high-resolution T2WI at 3T. Whole-lesion ROI delineations were performed on above sequences for radiomic feature extractions (60 and 26 patients in training and test cohorts, respectively). A baseline logistic model was applied to all sequences to compare their diagnostic performances in predicting LVI. Different machine learning models, including eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF) were further utilized on rDWI to assess LVI status. The performances of different models from these sequences and visual interpretation by radiologists were evaluated and compared for LVI prediction.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Radiomic models from DWI sequences performed better than visual interpretation for diagnosing LVI (<i>p </i>= 0.002–0.036). In logistics models, radiomics derived from rDWI outperformed those from T2WI (<i>z </i>= 2.064, <i>p </i>= 0.039) in differentiating-LVI. AUC of rDWI model was higher than that of fDWI but the difference was not statistically significant (<i>z </i>= 1.006, <i>p </i>= 0.315). No significant differences of performance were detected between fDWI and T2WI (<i>p </i>> 0.05). The best performance, with an AUC of 0.957, was achieved by the RF model derived from rDWI in the training cohort, with a significant difference noted between the RF and logistic models for LVI prediction (<i>z </i>= 2.250, <i>p </i>= 0.032).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>RDWI-derived radiomics performed better than T2WI and fDWI in differentiating LVI. Radiomic models based on rDWI were promising tools for facilitating clinical assessment of LVI status in rectal cancer.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical physics\",\"volume\":\"52 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.70015\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.70015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景淋巴血管侵犯(LVI)是直肠癌预后的重要因素,影响治疗计划。基于mri的放射学特征提供了肿瘤生物学行为的表型信息。目的:通过与常规DWI (fDWI)和高分辨率t2加权成像(T2WI)的比较,比较基于缩小视场扩散加权成像(rDWI)的不同模型在预测淋巴血管侵袭(LVI)方面的性能。方法86例直肠癌患者在3T处行rDWI、fDWI和高分辨率T2WI检查。对上述序列进行全病灶ROI描绘,以提取放射学特征(训练组和测试组分别为60例和26例患者)。基线逻辑模型应用于所有序列,以比较其预测LVI的诊断性能。不同的机器学习模型,包括极端梯度增强(XGBoost)、支持向量机(SVM)和随机森林(RF),进一步在rDWI上评估LVI状态。对这些序列和放射科医生的视觉解释的不同模型的性能进行了评估和比较,以预测LVI。结果DWI序列放射组学模型诊断LVI优于目测判读(p = 0.002 ~ 0.036)。在物流模型中,来自rDWI的放射组学在区分lvi方面优于T2WI (z = 2.064, p = 0.039)。rDWI模型的AUC高于fDWI,但差异无统计学意义(z = 1.006, p = 0.315)。fDWI与T2WI表现无显著差异(p > 0.05)。在训练队列中,基于rDWI的RF模型取得了最佳效果,AUC为0.957,RF模型与logistic模型在LVI预测方面存在显著差异(z = 2.250, p = 0.032)。结论rdwi衍生放射组学在诊断LVI方面优于T2WI和fDWI。基于rDWI的放射组学模型是促进直肠癌LVI状态临床评估的有前途的工具。
Comparison of reduced field-of-view DWI with conventional DWI for machine learning-based assessment of lymphovascular invasion in rectal cancer
Background
Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is an important prognostic factor of rectal cancer and influences treatment planning. MRI-based radiomic features provide phenotypic information on tumor biological behaviors.
Purpose
We aimed to compare the performance of different models derived from reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging (rDWI) for prediction of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in comparison with conventional DWI (fDWI) and high-resolution T2-weighted imaging (T2WI).
Methods
Eighty-six rectal cancer patients received rDWI, fDWI, and high-resolution T2WI at 3T. Whole-lesion ROI delineations were performed on above sequences for radiomic feature extractions (60 and 26 patients in training and test cohorts, respectively). A baseline logistic model was applied to all sequences to compare their diagnostic performances in predicting LVI. Different machine learning models, including eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF) were further utilized on rDWI to assess LVI status. The performances of different models from these sequences and visual interpretation by radiologists were evaluated and compared for LVI prediction.
Results
Radiomic models from DWI sequences performed better than visual interpretation for diagnosing LVI (p = 0.002–0.036). In logistics models, radiomics derived from rDWI outperformed those from T2WI (z = 2.064, p = 0.039) in differentiating-LVI. AUC of rDWI model was higher than that of fDWI but the difference was not statistically significant (z = 1.006, p = 0.315). No significant differences of performance were detected between fDWI and T2WI (p > 0.05). The best performance, with an AUC of 0.957, was achieved by the RF model derived from rDWI in the training cohort, with a significant difference noted between the RF and logistic models for LVI prediction (z = 2.250, p = 0.032).
Conclusion
RDWI-derived radiomics performed better than T2WI and fDWI in differentiating LVI. Radiomic models based on rDWI were promising tools for facilitating clinical assessment of LVI status in rectal cancer.
期刊介绍:
Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments
Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.