超声诊断前的体格检查:活蹦乱跳还是过去的遗物?

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Andreea M. Pavel , Yuki Arita , Ömer Kasalak , Thomas C. Kwee
{"title":"超声诊断前的体格检查:活蹦乱跳还是过去的遗物?","authors":"Andreea M. Pavel ,&nbsp;Yuki Arita ,&nbsp;Ömer Kasalak ,&nbsp;Thomas C. Kwee","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate how often physicians perform physical examination prior to referring patients for diagnostic ultrasonography (US), and whether its omission affects clinical reasoning quality or diagnostic yield.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this prospective study, patients undergoing diagnostic US at a tertiary care center (December 2024-April 2025) were asked whether their referring physician had performed a physical examination. Patient demographics, referring specialty, healthcare professional, US indication, and anatomical region were recorded. Clinical reasoning quality (0–100%) was defined as the alignment between clinically suspected and US findings. US outcomes were classified as positive, negative, or indeterminate. Associations with omission of physical examination were analyzed using multivariate regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 321 eligible patients, 302 were included (median age: 56 years; 48 % male). Physical examination was omitted in 168 cases (55.6 %). Omission was less likely in referrals from surgical specialties (odds ratio (OR) of 0.490, <em>P</em> = 0.032), family medicine (OR of 0.253, <em>P</em> = 0.016), and residents (OR 0.303, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), as well as in cases of new complaints (OR of 0.226, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and head and neck US (OR of 0.261, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Omission was marginally associated with lower clinical reasoning scores on univariate analysis (<em>P</em> = 0.050), but not after adjustment. Of all exams, 51 % were positive. Omission of physical examination showed a trend toward lower diagnostic yield (<em>P</em> = 0.059), but was not significant after adjustment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Physical examination was frequently omitted before US referral. While initially linked to reduced clinical reasoning and diagnostic yield, these associations did not remain significant after adjustment, suggesting no clear impact on diagnostic outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 112431"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical examination before diagnostic ultrasonography: Alive and kicking or a relic of the past?\",\"authors\":\"Andreea M. Pavel ,&nbsp;Yuki Arita ,&nbsp;Ömer Kasalak ,&nbsp;Thomas C. Kwee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate how often physicians perform physical examination prior to referring patients for diagnostic ultrasonography (US), and whether its omission affects clinical reasoning quality or diagnostic yield.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this prospective study, patients undergoing diagnostic US at a tertiary care center (December 2024-April 2025) were asked whether their referring physician had performed a physical examination. Patient demographics, referring specialty, healthcare professional, US indication, and anatomical region were recorded. Clinical reasoning quality (0–100%) was defined as the alignment between clinically suspected and US findings. US outcomes were classified as positive, negative, or indeterminate. Associations with omission of physical examination were analyzed using multivariate regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 321 eligible patients, 302 were included (median age: 56 years; 48 % male). Physical examination was omitted in 168 cases (55.6 %). Omission was less likely in referrals from surgical specialties (odds ratio (OR) of 0.490, <em>P</em> = 0.032), family medicine (OR of 0.253, <em>P</em> = 0.016), and residents (OR 0.303, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), as well as in cases of new complaints (OR of 0.226, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and head and neck US (OR of 0.261, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Omission was marginally associated with lower clinical reasoning scores on univariate analysis (<em>P</em> = 0.050), but not after adjustment. Of all exams, 51 % were positive. Omission of physical examination showed a trend toward lower diagnostic yield (<em>P</em> = 0.059), but was not significant after adjustment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Physical examination was frequently omitted before US referral. While initially linked to reduced clinical reasoning and diagnostic yield, these associations did not remain significant after adjustment, suggesting no clear impact on diagnostic outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"193 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112431\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25005170\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25005170","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨医生在转介患者进行诊断性超声检查(US)前进行体检的频率,以及体检遗漏是否会影响临床推理质量或诊断率。方法在这项前瞻性研究中,在三级医疗中心(2024年12月至2025年4月)接受诊断性超声检查的患者被问及他们的转诊医生是否进行过体检。记录患者人口统计学、转诊专科、医疗保健专业、美国适应症和解剖区域。临床推理质量(0-100%)定义为临床怀疑和美国结果之间的一致性。美国的结果分为积极、消极和不确定。采用多元回归分析与遗漏体检的关系。结果在321例符合条件的患者中,纳入302例(中位年龄:56岁;48%为男性)。遗漏体检168例(55.6%)。外科专科(比值比0.490,P = 0.032)、家庭医学(比值比0.253,P = 0.016)和住院医师(比值比0.303,P < 0.001)以及新主诉病例(比值比0.226,P < 0.001)和头颈部内科(比值比0.261,P < 0.001)的转诊中漏诊的可能性较小。在单变量分析中,遗漏与较低的临床推理评分有轻微的相关性(P = 0.050),但在调整后没有。在所有的检查中,51%是阳性的。遗漏体检有降低诊断率的趋势(P = 0.059),但调整后差异不显著。结论患者转诊前常忽略体格检查。虽然最初与临床推理和诊断准确率降低有关,但调整后这些关联并不显著,表明对诊断结果没有明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physical examination before diagnostic ultrasonography: Alive and kicking or a relic of the past?

Purpose

To investigate how often physicians perform physical examination prior to referring patients for diagnostic ultrasonography (US), and whether its omission affects clinical reasoning quality or diagnostic yield.

Methods

In this prospective study, patients undergoing diagnostic US at a tertiary care center (December 2024-April 2025) were asked whether their referring physician had performed a physical examination. Patient demographics, referring specialty, healthcare professional, US indication, and anatomical region were recorded. Clinical reasoning quality (0–100%) was defined as the alignment between clinically suspected and US findings. US outcomes were classified as positive, negative, or indeterminate. Associations with omission of physical examination were analyzed using multivariate regression.

Results

Of 321 eligible patients, 302 were included (median age: 56 years; 48 % male). Physical examination was omitted in 168 cases (55.6 %). Omission was less likely in referrals from surgical specialties (odds ratio (OR) of 0.490, P = 0.032), family medicine (OR of 0.253, P = 0.016), and residents (OR 0.303, P < 0.001), as well as in cases of new complaints (OR of 0.226, P < 0.001) and head and neck US (OR of 0.261, P < 0.001). Omission was marginally associated with lower clinical reasoning scores on univariate analysis (P = 0.050), but not after adjustment. Of all exams, 51 % were positive. Omission of physical examination showed a trend toward lower diagnostic yield (P = 0.059), but was not significant after adjustment.

Conclusion

Physical examination was frequently omitted before US referral. While initially linked to reduced clinical reasoning and diagnostic yield, these associations did not remain significant after adjustment, suggesting no clear impact on diagnostic outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信