急诊护士Z-track技术培训效果评价:单组前测后测研究

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nadiye Barış Eren
{"title":"急诊护士Z-track技术培训效果评价:单组前测后测研究","authors":"Nadiye Barış Eren","doi":"10.1016/j.ienj.2025.101683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This quasi-experimental single-group pretest–posttest study aimed to evaluate the effect of Z-track technique training on emergency nurses.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study was conducted among 75 nurses working at a state hospital in Türkiye from July to October 2023. Participants completed a descriptive characteristics form, a knowledge suggestions form, a Z-track technique skill checklist, and a Z-track technique usage frequency form. Descriptive statistics and within-group changes in repeated measurements were analyzed using a dependent-samples <em>t</em>-test. The significance level was set at p &lt; 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Prior to training, the participants’ mean knowledge suggestions score was 5.720, which increased to 11.880 after training (p &lt; 0.001). The mean Z-track technique skill checklist score also increased from 1.960 pre-training to 7.520 post-training (p &lt; 0.001). In addition, the mean Z-track technique usage frequency increased from 0.150 before training to 3.670 1 month after training (p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrated that training improved the nurses’ knowledge and skills related to the Z-track technique, leading to increased usage frequency 1 month later. Retention of knowledge and skills was supported by applying the technique in clinical practice. Since theoretical and practical training is often forgotten without regular application, implementing evidence-based standard procedures and in-service training programmes is essential to keep nurses’ competencies up to date. These programmes should focus on critical steps for safe injection practices, include hands-on training, and utilize positive reinforcements to enhance professional competence and ensure patient safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48914,"journal":{"name":"International Emergency Nursing","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 101683"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the effect of Z-track technique training on emergency nurses: A single-group pretest–posttest study\",\"authors\":\"Nadiye Barış Eren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ienj.2025.101683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This quasi-experimental single-group pretest–posttest study aimed to evaluate the effect of Z-track technique training on emergency nurses.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study was conducted among 75 nurses working at a state hospital in Türkiye from July to October 2023. Participants completed a descriptive characteristics form, a knowledge suggestions form, a Z-track technique skill checklist, and a Z-track technique usage frequency form. Descriptive statistics and within-group changes in repeated measurements were analyzed using a dependent-samples <em>t</em>-test. The significance level was set at p &lt; 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Prior to training, the participants’ mean knowledge suggestions score was 5.720, which increased to 11.880 after training (p &lt; 0.001). The mean Z-track technique skill checklist score also increased from 1.960 pre-training to 7.520 post-training (p &lt; 0.001). In addition, the mean Z-track technique usage frequency increased from 0.150 before training to 3.670 1 month after training (p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrated that training improved the nurses’ knowledge and skills related to the Z-track technique, leading to increased usage frequency 1 month later. Retention of knowledge and skills was supported by applying the technique in clinical practice. Since theoretical and practical training is often forgotten without regular application, implementing evidence-based standard procedures and in-service training programmes is essential to keep nurses’ competencies up to date. These programmes should focus on critical steps for safe injection practices, include hands-on training, and utilize positive reinforcements to enhance professional competence and ensure patient safety.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Emergency Nursing\",\"volume\":\"83 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101683\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Emergency Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X25001144\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X25001144","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的采用准实验的单组前测后测研究,评价Z-track技术培训对急诊护士的影响。方法对2023年7 - 10月在浙江省某公立医院工作的75名护士进行调查。参与者完成了一份描述性特征表、一份知识建议表、一份Z-track技术技能清单和一份Z-track技术使用频率表。描述性统计和重复测量的组内变化使用依赖样本t检验进行分析。显著性水平为p <; 0.05。结果培训前被试知识建议得分均值为5.720分,培训后被试知识建议得分均值为11.880分(p < 0.001)。z轨迹技术技能检查表平均得分也从训练前的1.960分增加到训练后的7.520分(p < 0.001)。此外,z轨迹技术平均使用频率从培训前的0.150次增加到培训后1个月的3.670次(p < 0.001)。结论培训提高了护士对Z-track技术的相关知识和技能,导致1个月后使用频率增加。通过在临床实践中应用该技术来支持知识和技能的保留。由于理论和实践培训常常在没有定期申请的情况下被遗忘,因此实施循证标准程序和在职培训计划对于保持护士的能力与时俱进至关重要。这些规划应侧重于安全注射做法的关键步骤,包括实际操作培训,并利用积极强化来提高专业能力和确保患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the effect of Z-track technique training on emergency nurses: A single-group pretest–posttest study

Aim

This quasi-experimental single-group pretest–posttest study aimed to evaluate the effect of Z-track technique training on emergency nurses.

Methods

The study was conducted among 75 nurses working at a state hospital in Türkiye from July to October 2023. Participants completed a descriptive characteristics form, a knowledge suggestions form, a Z-track technique skill checklist, and a Z-track technique usage frequency form. Descriptive statistics and within-group changes in repeated measurements were analyzed using a dependent-samples t-test. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Prior to training, the participants’ mean knowledge suggestions score was 5.720, which increased to 11.880 after training (p < 0.001). The mean Z-track technique skill checklist score also increased from 1.960 pre-training to 7.520 post-training (p < 0.001). In addition, the mean Z-track technique usage frequency increased from 0.150 before training to 3.670 1 month after training (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that training improved the nurses’ knowledge and skills related to the Z-track technique, leading to increased usage frequency 1 month later. Retention of knowledge and skills was supported by applying the technique in clinical practice. Since theoretical and practical training is often forgotten without regular application, implementing evidence-based standard procedures and in-service training programmes is essential to keep nurses’ competencies up to date. These programmes should focus on critical steps for safe injection practices, include hands-on training, and utilize positive reinforcements to enhance professional competence and ensure patient safety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: International Emergency Nursing is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to nurses and other professionals involved in emergency care. It aims to promote excellence through dissemination of high quality research findings, specialist knowledge and discussion of professional issues that reflect the diversity of this field. With an international readership and authorship, it provides a platform for practitioners worldwide to communicate and enhance the evidence-base of emergency care. The journal publishes a broad range of papers, from personal reflection to primary research findings, created by first-time through to reputable authors from a number of disciplines. It brings together research from practice, education, theory, and operational management, relevant to all levels of staff working in emergency care settings worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信