反向肩关节置换术在翻修设置

Q2 Medicine
Michael Livesey MD, C. Lucas Myerson MD, John G. Horneff III MD
{"title":"反向肩关节置换术在翻修设置","authors":"Michael Livesey MD,&nbsp;C. Lucas Myerson MD,&nbsp;John G. Horneff III MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.02.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent years have seen a rise in the popularity of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Over the past decade, changes in rTSA design have led to improvements in functional outcomes and implant survival as well as fewer complications. While traditionally indicated for the management of rotator cuff tear arthropathy, rTSA has emerged as a versatile revision option following failure of a primary procedure including failed shoulder arthroplasty, rotator cuff repair, or proximal humerus open reduction and internal fixation. A large body of literature has demonstrated the success of rTSA following these procedures. The purpose of this article is to review the outcomes of rTSA in the revision setting, compare them with outcomes of primary rTSA, and provide guidance to surgeons on how to use this option for a failed primary procedure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 5","pages":"Pages 1880-1885"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in the revision setting\",\"authors\":\"Michael Livesey MD,&nbsp;C. Lucas Myerson MD,&nbsp;John G. Horneff III MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.02.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Recent years have seen a rise in the popularity of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Over the past decade, changes in rTSA design have led to improvements in functional outcomes and implant survival as well as fewer complications. While traditionally indicated for the management of rotator cuff tear arthropathy, rTSA has emerged as a versatile revision option following failure of a primary procedure including failed shoulder arthroplasty, rotator cuff repair, or proximal humerus open reduction and internal fixation. A large body of literature has demonstrated the success of rTSA following these procedures. The purpose of this article is to review the outcomes of rTSA in the revision setting, compare them with outcomes of primary rTSA, and provide guidance to surgeons on how to use this option for a failed primary procedure.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSES International\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1880-1885\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSES International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638325000763\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638325000763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,逆行肩关节置换术(rTSA)越来越受欢迎。在过去的十年中,rTSA设计的变化导致了功能结果和植入物存活率的改善以及并发症的减少。虽然传统上用于治疗肩袖撕裂性关节病,但rTSA已成为原发性手术失败后的多功能翻修选择,包括肩关节置换术、肩袖修复或肱骨近端切开复位和内固定失败。大量文献已经证明rTSA遵循这些程序是成功的。本文的目的是回顾rTSA在翻修环境下的结果,将其与原发性rTSA的结果进行比较,并为外科医生在原发性手术失败时如何使用rTSA提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in the revision setting
Recent years have seen a rise in the popularity of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Over the past decade, changes in rTSA design have led to improvements in functional outcomes and implant survival as well as fewer complications. While traditionally indicated for the management of rotator cuff tear arthropathy, rTSA has emerged as a versatile revision option following failure of a primary procedure including failed shoulder arthroplasty, rotator cuff repair, or proximal humerus open reduction and internal fixation. A large body of literature has demonstrated the success of rTSA following these procedures. The purpose of this article is to review the outcomes of rTSA in the revision setting, compare them with outcomes of primary rTSA, and provide guidance to surgeons on how to use this option for a failed primary procedure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信