永久井计压力测量自动预处理的暂态识别新方法

IF 4.6 0 ENERGY & FUELS
Boyu Cui , Anton Shchipanov , Vasily Demyanov , Nan Zhang , Chunming Rong
{"title":"永久井计压力测量自动预处理的暂态识别新方法","authors":"Boyu Cui ,&nbsp;Anton Shchipanov ,&nbsp;Vasily Demyanov ,&nbsp;Nan Zhang ,&nbsp;Chunming Rong","doi":"10.1016/j.geoen.2025.214203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Well monitoring with pressure and temperature gauges is a part of well and reservoir surveillance systems across various industries, including petroleum and geothermal energy production as well as carbon capture and storage. Installing permanent downhole gauges (PDG) becomes a standard in the industry, which in combination with flow rates, provides measurements for well and reservoir monitoring by using pressure transient analysis (PTA). The feasibility and accuracy of PTA are governed by proper identification of pressure transients. Transient identification is traditionally a heavy manual trial-and-error process. It often involves pre-processing PDG data by resampling, denoising or outlier removal. However, any pre-processing may have a risk of overlooking important information. In addition, lack of pressure-rate synchronization in raw data complicates further PTA applications.</div><div>This paper introduces a novel methodology for automated transient identification from raw gauge data. The methodology enables identification of both shut-in and multi-rate flowing transients by using pressure data only. Moreover, the new transient identification runs on the raw data without resampling, denoising or outlier removal, which ensures keeping all the information from the measurements. The methodology is a combination of two new independent methods: Topographic Prominence Max Rotation (TPMR) and Local Minimum in Rotation (LMIR). The TPMR method utilizes the concept of prominence to identify significant shut-in transients. The LMIR method detects multi-rate flowing transients by identifying local minima in transformed pressure data via proper rotation matrix. Together, these methods provide an automated solution for dividing a pressure history into sequential flowing and shut-in transients. The new methodology has been tested and verified using real PDG datasets from the Norwegian Continental Shelf. The testing confirmed stability and accuracy of the methods, providing fast results with minimal human intervention. Then, an automated data pre-processing framework is described integrating the transient identification methodology with pressure and rate synchronization, rate reconstruction, superposition time and Bourdet derivative calculations. Finally, an integration of the framework within an automated time-lapse PTA well monitoring workflow is demonstrated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100578,"journal":{"name":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 214203"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New transient identification methods for automated pre-processing of pressure measurements with permanent well gauges\",\"authors\":\"Boyu Cui ,&nbsp;Anton Shchipanov ,&nbsp;Vasily Demyanov ,&nbsp;Nan Zhang ,&nbsp;Chunming Rong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoen.2025.214203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Well monitoring with pressure and temperature gauges is a part of well and reservoir surveillance systems across various industries, including petroleum and geothermal energy production as well as carbon capture and storage. Installing permanent downhole gauges (PDG) becomes a standard in the industry, which in combination with flow rates, provides measurements for well and reservoir monitoring by using pressure transient analysis (PTA). The feasibility and accuracy of PTA are governed by proper identification of pressure transients. Transient identification is traditionally a heavy manual trial-and-error process. It often involves pre-processing PDG data by resampling, denoising or outlier removal. However, any pre-processing may have a risk of overlooking important information. In addition, lack of pressure-rate synchronization in raw data complicates further PTA applications.</div><div>This paper introduces a novel methodology for automated transient identification from raw gauge data. The methodology enables identification of both shut-in and multi-rate flowing transients by using pressure data only. Moreover, the new transient identification runs on the raw data without resampling, denoising or outlier removal, which ensures keeping all the information from the measurements. The methodology is a combination of two new independent methods: Topographic Prominence Max Rotation (TPMR) and Local Minimum in Rotation (LMIR). The TPMR method utilizes the concept of prominence to identify significant shut-in transients. The LMIR method detects multi-rate flowing transients by identifying local minima in transformed pressure data via proper rotation matrix. Together, these methods provide an automated solution for dividing a pressure history into sequential flowing and shut-in transients. The new methodology has been tested and verified using real PDG datasets from the Norwegian Continental Shelf. The testing confirmed stability and accuracy of the methods, providing fast results with minimal human intervention. Then, an automated data pre-processing framework is described integrating the transient identification methodology with pressure and rate synchronization, rate reconstruction, superposition time and Bourdet derivative calculations. Finally, an integration of the framework within an automated time-lapse PTA well monitoring workflow is demonstrated.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoenergy Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"257 \",\"pages\":\"Article 214203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoenergy Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949891025005615\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949891025005615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用压力和温度计进行油井监测是油井和油藏监测系统的一部分,涉及石油和地热能生产以及碳捕获和储存等多个行业。安装永久性井下仪表(PDG)已成为行业标准,它与流量相结合,通过压力瞬态分析(PTA)为井和油藏监测提供测量数据。PTA的可行性和准确性取决于对压力瞬变的正确识别。瞬态识别传统上是一个繁重的人工试错过程。它通常涉及通过重采样、去噪或去除异常值来预处理PDG数据。然而,任何预处理都可能有忽略重要信息的风险。此外,原始数据中缺乏压力速率同步使PTA的进一步应用复杂化。本文介绍了一种利用原始仪表数据进行暂态自动识别的新方法。该方法仅通过使用压力数据就可以识别关井和多速率流动瞬态。此外,新的瞬态识别在原始数据上运行,无需重新采样,去噪或去除异常值,这确保了所有信息都来自测量。该方法结合了两种新的独立方法:地形日珥最大旋转(TPMR)和局部最小旋转(LMIR)。TPMR方法利用突出的概念来识别重要的关井瞬态。LMIR方法通过适当的旋转矩阵识别变换后的压力数据中的局部极小值,从而检测多速率流动瞬态。总之,这些方法提供了一种自动化的解决方案,可以将压力历史划分为连续流动和关井瞬态。新方法已经使用来自挪威大陆架的真实PDG数据集进行了测试和验证。测试证实了方法的稳定性和准确性,在最小的人为干预下提供快速结果。在此基础上,提出了一种基于压力和速率同步、速率重建、叠加时间和布尔代导数计算的瞬态识别方法的自动数据预处理框架。最后,演示了将该框架集成到自动延时PTA井监测工作流程中的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New transient identification methods for automated pre-processing of pressure measurements with permanent well gauges
Well monitoring with pressure and temperature gauges is a part of well and reservoir surveillance systems across various industries, including petroleum and geothermal energy production as well as carbon capture and storage. Installing permanent downhole gauges (PDG) becomes a standard in the industry, which in combination with flow rates, provides measurements for well and reservoir monitoring by using pressure transient analysis (PTA). The feasibility and accuracy of PTA are governed by proper identification of pressure transients. Transient identification is traditionally a heavy manual trial-and-error process. It often involves pre-processing PDG data by resampling, denoising or outlier removal. However, any pre-processing may have a risk of overlooking important information. In addition, lack of pressure-rate synchronization in raw data complicates further PTA applications.
This paper introduces a novel methodology for automated transient identification from raw gauge data. The methodology enables identification of both shut-in and multi-rate flowing transients by using pressure data only. Moreover, the new transient identification runs on the raw data without resampling, denoising or outlier removal, which ensures keeping all the information from the measurements. The methodology is a combination of two new independent methods: Topographic Prominence Max Rotation (TPMR) and Local Minimum in Rotation (LMIR). The TPMR method utilizes the concept of prominence to identify significant shut-in transients. The LMIR method detects multi-rate flowing transients by identifying local minima in transformed pressure data via proper rotation matrix. Together, these methods provide an automated solution for dividing a pressure history into sequential flowing and shut-in transients. The new methodology has been tested and verified using real PDG datasets from the Norwegian Continental Shelf. The testing confirmed stability and accuracy of the methods, providing fast results with minimal human intervention. Then, an automated data pre-processing framework is described integrating the transient identification methodology with pressure and rate synchronization, rate reconstruction, superposition time and Bourdet derivative calculations. Finally, an integration of the framework within an automated time-lapse PTA well monitoring workflow is demonstrated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信