玄武岩在压力下会融化:是否真的存在粘度最小值?

IF 3.6 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
James K. Russell , Kai-Uwe Hess , Ana Anzulovic , Donald B. Dingwell
{"title":"玄武岩在压力下会融化:是否真的存在粘度最小值?","authors":"James K. Russell ,&nbsp;Kai-Uwe Hess ,&nbsp;Ana Anzulovic ,&nbsp;Donald B. Dingwell","doi":"10.1016/j.chemgeo.2025.123051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Basalts are the most numerous and voluminous magmas on Earth, the moon and other terrestrial planets and moons. Melt viscosity plays a major role in modulating the rates and efficacy of many magmatic and volcanic processes (e.g., melt extraction, ascent rates, eruption styles). The pressure dependence of melt viscosity is particularly relevant to basalts because of the wide range of pressures they experience during ascent from their mantle sources to Earth's surface. Here, we review and critically analyse the published high pressure experimental data for the viscosity of basaltic melts. Our compilation of high-pressure measurements of basalt viscosity is relatively sparse comprising a total of 56 experiments. The experiments span a temperature range of 1275 to 2000 °C, pressures from 0.5 to 7 GPa, and anhydrous melt compositions ranging from MORB, to Hawaiian tholeiite, to alkali olivine basalt (AOB). We focussed our analysis on nineteen modern falling sphere experiments on MORB (<span><span>Sakamaki et al., 2013</span></span>) and AOB (<span><span>Bonechi et al., 2022</span></span>) melts that were imaged with real-time, x-ray radiography. Our analysis of these data suggests a monotonic positive pressure dependence for basaltic melt viscosity. On that basis, we present a predictive model for the Newtonian viscosity of AOB melts as a function of temperature (T), pressure (P):<span><span><span><math><mi>log</mi><mspace></mspace><mi>η</mi><mo>=</mo><mo>−</mo><mn>4.55</mn><mo>+</mo><mfrac><mrow><mn>7845.4</mn><mo>+</mo><mn>295.4</mn><mspace></mspace><mfenced><mrow><mi>P</mi><mfenced><mi>GPa</mi></mfenced><mo>−</mo><mn>0.001</mn></mrow></mfenced></mrow><mrow><mi>T</mi><mfenced><mi>K</mi></mfenced></mrow></mfrac></math></span></span></span></div><div>A similar model applied to the MORB dataset is consistent with a significantly lower (i.e. 13.3 vs. 295.4) positive pressure coefficient implying a less pressure-dependent viscosity. Our observations call into question the concept of a minimum in the pressure dependence of basaltic melt viscosity which has been argued to inhibit the ascent of basaltic magmas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9847,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Geology","volume":"695 ","pages":"Article 123051"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Basalt melts under pressure: Is there really a viscosity minimum?\",\"authors\":\"James K. Russell ,&nbsp;Kai-Uwe Hess ,&nbsp;Ana Anzulovic ,&nbsp;Donald B. Dingwell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chemgeo.2025.123051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Basalts are the most numerous and voluminous magmas on Earth, the moon and other terrestrial planets and moons. Melt viscosity plays a major role in modulating the rates and efficacy of many magmatic and volcanic processes (e.g., melt extraction, ascent rates, eruption styles). The pressure dependence of melt viscosity is particularly relevant to basalts because of the wide range of pressures they experience during ascent from their mantle sources to Earth's surface. Here, we review and critically analyse the published high pressure experimental data for the viscosity of basaltic melts. Our compilation of high-pressure measurements of basalt viscosity is relatively sparse comprising a total of 56 experiments. The experiments span a temperature range of 1275 to 2000 °C, pressures from 0.5 to 7 GPa, and anhydrous melt compositions ranging from MORB, to Hawaiian tholeiite, to alkali olivine basalt (AOB). We focussed our analysis on nineteen modern falling sphere experiments on MORB (<span><span>Sakamaki et al., 2013</span></span>) and AOB (<span><span>Bonechi et al., 2022</span></span>) melts that were imaged with real-time, x-ray radiography. Our analysis of these data suggests a monotonic positive pressure dependence for basaltic melt viscosity. On that basis, we present a predictive model for the Newtonian viscosity of AOB melts as a function of temperature (T), pressure (P):<span><span><span><math><mi>log</mi><mspace></mspace><mi>η</mi><mo>=</mo><mo>−</mo><mn>4.55</mn><mo>+</mo><mfrac><mrow><mn>7845.4</mn><mo>+</mo><mn>295.4</mn><mspace></mspace><mfenced><mrow><mi>P</mi><mfenced><mi>GPa</mi></mfenced><mo>−</mo><mn>0.001</mn></mrow></mfenced></mrow><mrow><mi>T</mi><mfenced><mi>K</mi></mfenced></mrow></mfrac></math></span></span></span></div><div>A similar model applied to the MORB dataset is consistent with a significantly lower (i.e. 13.3 vs. 295.4) positive pressure coefficient implying a less pressure-dependent viscosity. Our observations call into question the concept of a minimum in the pressure dependence of basaltic melt viscosity which has been argued to inhibit the ascent of basaltic magmas.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical Geology\",\"volume\":\"695 \",\"pages\":\"Article 123051\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical Geology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009254125004413\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009254125004413","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

玄武岩是地球、月球和其他类地行星和卫星上数量最多、体积最大的岩浆。熔体粘度在调节许多岩浆和火山过程(例如,熔体萃取、上升速率、喷发样式)的速率和效力方面起着重要作用。熔体粘度的压力依赖性与玄武岩特别相关,因为它们在从地幔源上升到地球表面的过程中经历了广泛的压力。在此,我们回顾并批判性地分析了已发表的玄武岩熔体粘度的高压实验数据。我们编制的玄武岩粘度高压测量相对较少,总共有56个实验。实验温度范围为1275 ~ 2000℃,压力范围为0.5 ~ 7 GPa,无水熔体成分从MORB到夏威夷拉斑岩,再到碱橄榄玄武岩(AOB)。我们将分析重点放在MORB (Sakamaki等人,2013年)和AOB (Bonechi等人,2022年)熔体的19个现代落球实验上,这些实验用实时x射线摄影成像。我们对这些数据的分析表明,玄武岩熔体粘度具有单调的正压依赖性。在此基础上,我们提出了AOB熔体牛顿粘度随温度(T)、压力(P)的预测模型:logη=−4.55+7845.4+295.4 pgpa−0.001。应用于MORB数据集的tka类似模型与显著较低的正压力系数(即13.3 vs. 295.4)相一致,这意味着压力依赖性较小。我们的观察结果对玄武岩熔体粘度的压力依赖性的最小值概念提出了质疑,该概念被认为抑制了玄武岩岩浆的上升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Basalt melts under pressure: Is there really a viscosity minimum?
Basalts are the most numerous and voluminous magmas on Earth, the moon and other terrestrial planets and moons. Melt viscosity plays a major role in modulating the rates and efficacy of many magmatic and volcanic processes (e.g., melt extraction, ascent rates, eruption styles). The pressure dependence of melt viscosity is particularly relevant to basalts because of the wide range of pressures they experience during ascent from their mantle sources to Earth's surface. Here, we review and critically analyse the published high pressure experimental data for the viscosity of basaltic melts. Our compilation of high-pressure measurements of basalt viscosity is relatively sparse comprising a total of 56 experiments. The experiments span a temperature range of 1275 to 2000 °C, pressures from 0.5 to 7 GPa, and anhydrous melt compositions ranging from MORB, to Hawaiian tholeiite, to alkali olivine basalt (AOB). We focussed our analysis on nineteen modern falling sphere experiments on MORB (Sakamaki et al., 2013) and AOB (Bonechi et al., 2022) melts that were imaged with real-time, x-ray radiography. Our analysis of these data suggests a monotonic positive pressure dependence for basaltic melt viscosity. On that basis, we present a predictive model for the Newtonian viscosity of AOB melts as a function of temperature (T), pressure (P):logη=4.55+7845.4+295.4PGPa0.001TK
A similar model applied to the MORB dataset is consistent with a significantly lower (i.e. 13.3 vs. 295.4) positive pressure coefficient implying a less pressure-dependent viscosity. Our observations call into question the concept of a minimum in the pressure dependence of basaltic melt viscosity which has been argued to inhibit the ascent of basaltic magmas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical Geology
Chemical Geology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Geology is an international journal that publishes original research papers on isotopic and elemental geochemistry, geochronology and cosmochemistry. The Journal focuses on chemical processes in igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary petrology, low- and high-temperature aqueous solutions, biogeochemistry, the environment and cosmochemistry. Papers that are field, experimentally, or computationally based are appropriate if they are of broad international interest. The Journal generally does not publish papers that are primarily of regional or local interest, or which are primarily focused on remediation and applied geochemistry. The Journal also welcomes innovative papers dealing with significant analytical advances that are of wide interest in the community and extend significantly beyond the scope of what would be included in the methods section of a standard research paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信