利用相对渗透率数据评估二氧化碳-水系统中岩石的润湿性:对含盐含水层中地质CO2封存的影响

IF 4.6 0 ENERGY & FUELS
Abouzar Mirzaei-Paiaman, Jerry L. Jensen, Sheng Peng
{"title":"利用相对渗透率数据评估二氧化碳-水系统中岩石的润湿性:对含盐含水层中地质CO2封存的影响","authors":"Abouzar Mirzaei-Paiaman,&nbsp;Jerry L. Jensen,&nbsp;Sheng Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.geoen.2025.214228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wettability of the reservoir rock plays a crucial role in CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration in saline aquifers, affecting trapping mechanisms, migration dynamics, spatial distribution, and injection performance. We present two methods to determine rock wettability in CO<sub>2</sub>-water systems by analyzing water-displacing-CO<sub>2</sub> relative permeability data. The first method assesses whether the water saturation at the crossover point of relative permeability curves is above or below a reference value —defined as a function of endpoint saturations— to indicate water-wet, CO<sub>2</sub>-wet, or neutral-wet conditions. The second method compares the areas under the CO<sub>2</sub> and water relative permeability curves, based on the principle that the wetting fluid's area should be smaller. We developed two indices for each method, ranging from −1 (strongly CO<sub>2</sub>-wet) to 1 (strongly water-wet). Wettability was evaluated from 33 tests across sandstones, carbonates, and shales, showing a range of CO<sub>2</sub>-wet to water-wet states that generally align with reported contact angle measurements. A key observation is that simpler water–oil systems used as proxies may not reliably represent CO<sub>2</sub>–brine behavior, as they often remain water-wet due to cleaning procedures and the use of fluids that do not alter wettability during the experiment, even when viscosity ratios and interfacial tensions are matched. While uncertainties remain due to sampling origin (e.g., outcrop versus subsurface) and laboratory cleaning procedures, the ability to derive wettability directly from relative permeability data offers a practical advantage, as such measurements are more accessible than reliable contact angle data. This enables more robust interpretation of multiphase flow behavior, supporting improved assessments of CO<sub>2</sub> storage capacity, injectivity, and long-term containment. The approach presented in this research for inferring wettability from relative permeability data is not limited to CO<sub>2</sub>–brine systems. It can also be applied to other systems, such as water displacing hydrogen sulfide (H<sub>2</sub>S) in acid gas storage or water displacing hydrogen in underground hydrogen storage (UHS).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100578,"journal":{"name":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 214228"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating rock wettability in CO2-water systems using relative permeability data: Implications for geologic CO2 sequestration in saline aquifers\",\"authors\":\"Abouzar Mirzaei-Paiaman,&nbsp;Jerry L. Jensen,&nbsp;Sheng Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoen.2025.214228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Wettability of the reservoir rock plays a crucial role in CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration in saline aquifers, affecting trapping mechanisms, migration dynamics, spatial distribution, and injection performance. We present two methods to determine rock wettability in CO<sub>2</sub>-water systems by analyzing water-displacing-CO<sub>2</sub> relative permeability data. The first method assesses whether the water saturation at the crossover point of relative permeability curves is above or below a reference value —defined as a function of endpoint saturations— to indicate water-wet, CO<sub>2</sub>-wet, or neutral-wet conditions. The second method compares the areas under the CO<sub>2</sub> and water relative permeability curves, based on the principle that the wetting fluid's area should be smaller. We developed two indices for each method, ranging from −1 (strongly CO<sub>2</sub>-wet) to 1 (strongly water-wet). Wettability was evaluated from 33 tests across sandstones, carbonates, and shales, showing a range of CO<sub>2</sub>-wet to water-wet states that generally align with reported contact angle measurements. A key observation is that simpler water–oil systems used as proxies may not reliably represent CO<sub>2</sub>–brine behavior, as they often remain water-wet due to cleaning procedures and the use of fluids that do not alter wettability during the experiment, even when viscosity ratios and interfacial tensions are matched. While uncertainties remain due to sampling origin (e.g., outcrop versus subsurface) and laboratory cleaning procedures, the ability to derive wettability directly from relative permeability data offers a practical advantage, as such measurements are more accessible than reliable contact angle data. This enables more robust interpretation of multiphase flow behavior, supporting improved assessments of CO<sub>2</sub> storage capacity, injectivity, and long-term containment. The approach presented in this research for inferring wettability from relative permeability data is not limited to CO<sub>2</sub>–brine systems. It can also be applied to other systems, such as water displacing hydrogen sulfide (H<sub>2</sub>S) in acid gas storage or water displacing hydrogen in underground hydrogen storage (UHS).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoenergy Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"257 \",\"pages\":\"Article 214228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoenergy Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294989102500586X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294989102500586X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

储层岩石的润湿性对含盐含水层的CO2封存起着至关重要的作用,影响着封存机制、运移动力学、空间分布和注入性能。我们提出了两种通过分析水-驱替-二氧化碳相对渗透率数据来确定co2 -水体系中岩石润湿性的方法。第一种方法评估相对渗透率曲线交叉点的水饱和度是否高于或低于参考值(定义为端点饱和度的函数),以指示水湿、二氧化碳湿或中性湿条件。第二种方法基于润湿液面积较小的原则,对CO2和水相对渗透率曲线下的面积进行比较。我们为每种方法开发了两个指数,范围从−1(强烈的二氧化碳湿)到1(强烈的水湿)。在砂岩、碳酸盐和页岩中进行了33次测试,评估了润湿性,显示了一系列二氧化碳湿态和水湿态,与报告的接触角测量值基本一致。一个关键的观察结果是,简单的水-油体系可能不能可靠地代表co2 -盐水的行为,因为即使在粘度比和界面张力匹配的情况下,由于清洗程序和使用的液体不改变实验过程中的润湿性,它们通常仍保持水湿性。虽然采样来源(例如,露头与地下)和实验室清洗程序仍然存在不确定性,但直接从相对渗透率数据中获得润湿性的能力提供了实际优势,因为这种测量比可靠的接触角数据更容易获得。这可以更可靠地解释多相流行为,支持改进二氧化碳储存能力、注入能力和长期遏制能力的评估。本研究中提出的从相对渗透率数据推断润湿性的方法并不局限于二氧化碳-盐水体系。它也可以应用于其他系统,例如在酸性储气库中水取代硫化氢(H2S)或在地下储氢库(UHS)中水取代氢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating rock wettability in CO2-water systems using relative permeability data: Implications for geologic CO2 sequestration in saline aquifers

Evaluating rock wettability in CO2-water systems using relative permeability data: Implications for geologic CO2 sequestration in saline aquifers
Wettability of the reservoir rock plays a crucial role in CO2 sequestration in saline aquifers, affecting trapping mechanisms, migration dynamics, spatial distribution, and injection performance. We present two methods to determine rock wettability in CO2-water systems by analyzing water-displacing-CO2 relative permeability data. The first method assesses whether the water saturation at the crossover point of relative permeability curves is above or below a reference value —defined as a function of endpoint saturations— to indicate water-wet, CO2-wet, or neutral-wet conditions. The second method compares the areas under the CO2 and water relative permeability curves, based on the principle that the wetting fluid's area should be smaller. We developed two indices for each method, ranging from −1 (strongly CO2-wet) to 1 (strongly water-wet). Wettability was evaluated from 33 tests across sandstones, carbonates, and shales, showing a range of CO2-wet to water-wet states that generally align with reported contact angle measurements. A key observation is that simpler water–oil systems used as proxies may not reliably represent CO2–brine behavior, as they often remain water-wet due to cleaning procedures and the use of fluids that do not alter wettability during the experiment, even when viscosity ratios and interfacial tensions are matched. While uncertainties remain due to sampling origin (e.g., outcrop versus subsurface) and laboratory cleaning procedures, the ability to derive wettability directly from relative permeability data offers a practical advantage, as such measurements are more accessible than reliable contact angle data. This enables more robust interpretation of multiphase flow behavior, supporting improved assessments of CO2 storage capacity, injectivity, and long-term containment. The approach presented in this research for inferring wettability from relative permeability data is not limited to CO2–brine systems. It can also be applied to other systems, such as water displacing hydrogen sulfide (H2S) in acid gas storage or water displacing hydrogen in underground hydrogen storage (UHS).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信