在坐式单臂水平推试验中,评估上肢最大力量最合适的实心球质量是多少?

IF 1.4 Q3 REHABILITATION
Matthieu Degot , Isabelle Rogowski , Alexandre Dingome , Pierre Samozino , Baptiste Morel , Yoann Blache
{"title":"在坐式单臂水平推试验中,评估上肢最大力量最合适的实心球质量是多少?","authors":"Matthieu Degot ,&nbsp;Isabelle Rogowski ,&nbsp;Alexandre Dingome ,&nbsp;Pierre Samozino ,&nbsp;Baptiste Morel ,&nbsp;Yoann Blache","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.09.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Different medicine ball (MB) masses are used for the unilateral MB push to indirectly determine upper-extremity power. This study aimed to identify the most suitable MB mass for assessing maximal upper-extremity power through the seated single-arm horizontal push test (SSAHPT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty-four athletes performed the SSAHPT with three different MB masses (1 kg, 3 kg, and 5 kg) and the unilateral ballistic bench press test. For each limb, the SSAHPT distance was determined, and the maximal power (Pmax) and force-velocity profile (SFv) were extracted from the unilateral bench press test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For the 1-kg and 3-kg MB, SSAHPT performance variation was explained by the variations of Pmax and Dominance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.82–0.86), with the effect of Pmax about 5.5 times greater than the effect of Dominance. For the 5-kg MB mass, SSAHPT performance variation was explained by the variations of Pmax, Dominance, and SFv (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.85). The effect of Pmax was 5.3 and 1.6 times greater than the effect of Dominance and SFv, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>To limit the involvement of the athlete's force-velocity profile in SSAHPT performance with a 5-kg MB mass, it is advisable to use either a 1-kg or 3-kg MB mass when SSAHPT is employed to reflect maximal upper-extremity power.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"45 ","pages":"Pages 438-444"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the most suitable medicine ball mass for assessing maximal upper-extremity power in the seated single-arm horizontal push test?\",\"authors\":\"Matthieu Degot ,&nbsp;Isabelle Rogowski ,&nbsp;Alexandre Dingome ,&nbsp;Pierre Samozino ,&nbsp;Baptiste Morel ,&nbsp;Yoann Blache\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.09.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Different medicine ball (MB) masses are used for the unilateral MB push to indirectly determine upper-extremity power. This study aimed to identify the most suitable MB mass for assessing maximal upper-extremity power through the seated single-arm horizontal push test (SSAHPT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty-four athletes performed the SSAHPT with three different MB masses (1 kg, 3 kg, and 5 kg) and the unilateral ballistic bench press test. For each limb, the SSAHPT distance was determined, and the maximal power (Pmax) and force-velocity profile (SFv) were extracted from the unilateral bench press test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For the 1-kg and 3-kg MB, SSAHPT performance variation was explained by the variations of Pmax and Dominance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.82–0.86), with the effect of Pmax about 5.5 times greater than the effect of Dominance. For the 5-kg MB mass, SSAHPT performance variation was explained by the variations of Pmax, Dominance, and SFv (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.85). The effect of Pmax was 5.3 and 1.6 times greater than the effect of Dominance and SFv, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>To limit the involvement of the athlete's force-velocity profile in SSAHPT performance with a 5-kg MB mass, it is advisable to use either a 1-kg or 3-kg MB mass when SSAHPT is employed to reflect maximal upper-extremity power.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 438-444\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225003705\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225003705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用不同的药球质量进行单侧药球推压,间接测定上肢力量。本研究旨在通过坐式单臂水平推试验(SSAHPT)确定最适合评估上肢最大力量的MB质量。方法34名运动员分别以3种不同的MB质量(1 kg、3 kg和5 kg)进行SSAHPT和单侧弹道卧推试验。确定各肢体的SSAHPT距离,提取单侧卧推试验的最大功率(Pmax)和力-速度剖面(SFv)。结果对于1 kg和3 kg的MB, SSAHPT成绩的变化可以通过Pmax和Dominance的变化来解释(R2 = 0.82 ~ 0.86),其中Pmax的影响约为Dominance的5.5倍。对于5kg MB质量,SSAHPT性能的变化可以通过Pmax、Dominance和SFv的变化来解释(R2 = 0.85)。Pmax的效应分别是优势度和SFv的5.3倍和1.6倍。结论为限制5kg MB质量时运动员力-速度分布对SSAHPT成绩的影响,在使用SSAHPT反映上肢最大力量时,建议使用1kg或3kg MB质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What is the most suitable medicine ball mass for assessing maximal upper-extremity power in the seated single-arm horizontal push test?

Introduction

Different medicine ball (MB) masses are used for the unilateral MB push to indirectly determine upper-extremity power. This study aimed to identify the most suitable MB mass for assessing maximal upper-extremity power through the seated single-arm horizontal push test (SSAHPT).

Methods

Thirty-four athletes performed the SSAHPT with three different MB masses (1 kg, 3 kg, and 5 kg) and the unilateral ballistic bench press test. For each limb, the SSAHPT distance was determined, and the maximal power (Pmax) and force-velocity profile (SFv) were extracted from the unilateral bench press test.

Results

For the 1-kg and 3-kg MB, SSAHPT performance variation was explained by the variations of Pmax and Dominance (R2 = 0.82–0.86), with the effect of Pmax about 5.5 times greater than the effect of Dominance. For the 5-kg MB mass, SSAHPT performance variation was explained by the variations of Pmax, Dominance, and SFv (R2 = 0.85). The effect of Pmax was 5.3 and 1.6 times greater than the effect of Dominance and SFv, respectively.

Conclusion

To limit the involvement of the athlete's force-velocity profile in SSAHPT performance with a 5-kg MB mass, it is advisable to use either a 1-kg or 3-kg MB mass when SSAHPT is employed to reflect maximal upper-extremity power.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信