腕中部不稳定的背囊固定术和三韧带肌腱固定术的长期手术效果:平均随访8年。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Isabel C Jongen, Niek J Nieuwdorp, Caroline A Hundepool, Amber Bouman, Sebastiaan Souer, Ruud W Selles, J Michiel Zuidam
{"title":"腕中部不稳定的背囊固定术和三韧带肌腱固定术的长期手术效果:平均随访8年。","authors":"Isabel C Jongen, Niek J Nieuwdorp, Caroline A Hundepool, Amber Bouman, Sebastiaan Souer, Ruud W Selles, J Michiel Zuidam","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.07.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The long-term effectiveness of surgical stabilization for midcarpal instability (MCI), or carpal instability nondissociative, is often debated due to concerns about the potential weakening of the reinforced ligaments or joint capsule over time. Ligament reconstruction techniques like three-ligament tenodesis (3LT) may offer more durable stabilization than the more common dorsal capsulodesis, given the intraosseous nature of stabilization. However, comparative long-term studies are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the durability of surgical stabilization for nontraumatic MCI and compare the long-term outcomes of 3LT with dorsal capsulodesis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients who underwent surgical stabilization for nontraumatic MCI with either dorsal capsulodesis or 3LT. Patient-reported pain and function were assessed using the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE). Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction and subsequent treatments. A linear mixed model was used to analyze PRWE scores across different time points during long-term follow-up and compare the outcomes between the two techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We contacted 179 patients for long-term follow-up, including 143 patients treated with dorsal capsulodesis and 36 with 3LT, at a mean follow-up duration of 8 years (range: 2.7-12.4 years). Both techniques showed significantly improved PRWE function, pain, and total scores from intake to 12 months after surgery, with sustained results over long-term follow-up. At 3 months after surgery, dorsal capsulodesis demonstrated significantly better PRWE total and pain scores compared with 3LT. However, this difference was not observed at 12 months or during the long-term follow-up. There was no difference in patient satisfaction or subsequent treatment rates between both the treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical stabilization provides durable, favorable outcomes for nontraumatic MCI, making it a reliable treatment option for patients who do not achieve sufficient relief from nonsurgical treatment. We prefer dorsal capsulodesis over the more invasive 3LT due to its quicker recovery and comparable, favorable long-term outcomes regarding pain, function, satisfaction, and subsequent treatment.</p><p><strong>Type of study/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic II.</p>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Surgical Outcomes of Dorsal Capsulodesis and Three-Ligament Tenodesis in Midcarpal Instability: A Mean Follow-Up of 8 Years.\",\"authors\":\"Isabel C Jongen, Niek J Nieuwdorp, Caroline A Hundepool, Amber Bouman, Sebastiaan Souer, Ruud W Selles, J Michiel Zuidam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.07.037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The long-term effectiveness of surgical stabilization for midcarpal instability (MCI), or carpal instability nondissociative, is often debated due to concerns about the potential weakening of the reinforced ligaments or joint capsule over time. Ligament reconstruction techniques like three-ligament tenodesis (3LT) may offer more durable stabilization than the more common dorsal capsulodesis, given the intraosseous nature of stabilization. However, comparative long-term studies are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the durability of surgical stabilization for nontraumatic MCI and compare the long-term outcomes of 3LT with dorsal capsulodesis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients who underwent surgical stabilization for nontraumatic MCI with either dorsal capsulodesis or 3LT. Patient-reported pain and function were assessed using the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE). Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction and subsequent treatments. A linear mixed model was used to analyze PRWE scores across different time points during long-term follow-up and compare the outcomes between the two techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We contacted 179 patients for long-term follow-up, including 143 patients treated with dorsal capsulodesis and 36 with 3LT, at a mean follow-up duration of 8 years (range: 2.7-12.4 years). Both techniques showed significantly improved PRWE function, pain, and total scores from intake to 12 months after surgery, with sustained results over long-term follow-up. At 3 months after surgery, dorsal capsulodesis demonstrated significantly better PRWE total and pain scores compared with 3LT. However, this difference was not observed at 12 months or during the long-term follow-up. There was no difference in patient satisfaction or subsequent treatment rates between both the treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical stabilization provides durable, favorable outcomes for nontraumatic MCI, making it a reliable treatment option for patients who do not achieve sufficient relief from nonsurgical treatment. We prefer dorsal capsulodesis over the more invasive 3LT due to its quicker recovery and comparable, favorable long-term outcomes regarding pain, function, satisfaction, and subsequent treatment.</p><p><strong>Type of study/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic II.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.07.037\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.07.037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:手术稳定对腕中不稳定(MCI)或非解离性腕不稳定的长期有效性经常存在争议,因为人们担心随着时间的推移,增强的韧带或关节囊可能会减弱。考虑到骨内稳定的特性,像三韧带肌腱固定术(3LT)这样的韧带重建技术可能比更常见的背囊固定术提供更持久的稳定。然而,缺乏比较长期的研究。本研究旨在评估非外伤性轻度认知损伤手术稳定的持久性,并比较3LT与背囊置换术的长期结果。方法:我们纳入了接受手术稳定的非外伤性轻度认知损伤患者,无论是背囊切除术还是3LT。采用患者腕关节评估(PRWE)对患者报告的疼痛和功能进行评估。次要结局包括患者满意度和后续治疗。采用线性混合模型分析长期随访期间不同时间点的PRWE评分,并比较两种技术的结果。结果:我们联系了179例患者进行长期随访,其中143例接受背囊移植术,36例接受3LT,平均随访时间为8年(范围:2.7-12.4年)。两种技术均能显著改善PRWE功能、疼痛和手术后12个月的总分,并在长期随访中取得持续的效果。术后3个月,与3LT相比,背部包膜固定术的PRWE总分和疼痛评分明显提高。然而,在12个月或长期随访期间没有观察到这种差异。两组患者满意度和后续治疗率均无差异。结论:手术稳定为非外伤性轻度认知损伤提供了持久、良好的预后,使其成为非手术治疗无法获得充分缓解的患者的可靠治疗选择。与更具侵入性的3LT相比,我们更倾向于采用背囊移植术,因为它恢复更快,并且在疼痛、功能、满意度和后续治疗方面具有可比性,有利的长期结果。研究类型/证据水平:治疗性II。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-Term Surgical Outcomes of Dorsal Capsulodesis and Three-Ligament Tenodesis in Midcarpal Instability: A Mean Follow-Up of 8 Years.

Purpose: The long-term effectiveness of surgical stabilization for midcarpal instability (MCI), or carpal instability nondissociative, is often debated due to concerns about the potential weakening of the reinforced ligaments or joint capsule over time. Ligament reconstruction techniques like three-ligament tenodesis (3LT) may offer more durable stabilization than the more common dorsal capsulodesis, given the intraosseous nature of stabilization. However, comparative long-term studies are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the durability of surgical stabilization for nontraumatic MCI and compare the long-term outcomes of 3LT with dorsal capsulodesis.

Methods: We included patients who underwent surgical stabilization for nontraumatic MCI with either dorsal capsulodesis or 3LT. Patient-reported pain and function were assessed using the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE). Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction and subsequent treatments. A linear mixed model was used to analyze PRWE scores across different time points during long-term follow-up and compare the outcomes between the two techniques.

Results: We contacted 179 patients for long-term follow-up, including 143 patients treated with dorsal capsulodesis and 36 with 3LT, at a mean follow-up duration of 8 years (range: 2.7-12.4 years). Both techniques showed significantly improved PRWE function, pain, and total scores from intake to 12 months after surgery, with sustained results over long-term follow-up. At 3 months after surgery, dorsal capsulodesis demonstrated significantly better PRWE total and pain scores compared with 3LT. However, this difference was not observed at 12 months or during the long-term follow-up. There was no difference in patient satisfaction or subsequent treatment rates between both the treatment groups.

Conclusions: Surgical stabilization provides durable, favorable outcomes for nontraumatic MCI, making it a reliable treatment option for patients who do not achieve sufficient relief from nonsurgical treatment. We prefer dorsal capsulodesis over the more invasive 3LT due to its quicker recovery and comparable, favorable long-term outcomes regarding pain, function, satisfaction, and subsequent treatment.

Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic II.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信