在全层肩袖撕裂中,喙下撞击加重疼痛和肩胛骨功能障碍。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Yi-Hsuan Weng, Yang-Ting Chien, Chon-Kio Wong, Jing-Lan Yang, Chung-Hsun Chang, Jiu-Jenq Lin
{"title":"在全层肩袖撕裂中,喙下撞击加重疼痛和肩胛骨功能障碍。","authors":"Yi-Hsuan Weng, Yang-Ting Chien, Chon-Kio Wong, Jing-Lan Yang, Chung-Hsun Chang, Jiu-Jenq Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2025.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subcoracoid impingement co-occurs with subacromial impingement in 19% of patients with rotator cuff tears. The influence of subcoracoid impingement in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tear (FT-RCT) remains unknown. Therefore, it is worthwhile to investigate potential differences between FT-RCT patients with and without subcoracoid impingement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-two participants were categorized as having an FT-RCT combined with subcoracoid impingement, while 25 others were diagnosed with an FT-RCT without subcoracoid impingement. Characteristics and tear sizes were recorded using ultrasonography (USG). Humeral head migration was assessed by calculating the acromiohumeral distance using USG at 0°, 60°, and 90° of shoulder abduction. Shoulder range of motion, pain levels, and self-reported shoulder function were evaluated. Scapular kinematics (upward/downward rotation, anterior/posterior tilt, external/internal rotation) and associated muscle activities (upper trapezius, lower trapezius, serratus anterior [SA] and teres major [TM]) were recorded during arm raising and lowering using motion tracing and surface electromyography systems, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FT-RCT combined with subcoracoid impingement group experienced slightly higher pain levels (1.7±0.6, 95% CI=0.5-2.9, p=0.008) and marginally more humeral head superior migration from 0°-60° shoulder abduction (0.14±0.05 cm, 95% CI=0.03-0.25 cm, p=0.017) compared to the FT-RCT without subcoracoid impingement group. Regarding scapular biomechanics, the FT-RCT combined with subcoracoid impingement group demonstrated decreased upward rotation during arm lowering (4.0±1.3°, 95% CI=1.4-6.5°, p=0.003) as well as decreased SA muscle activation during arm lowering (18.8±8.5%, 95% CI=1.7-36.0%, p=0.032) and decreased TM muscle activation during arm raising (11.4±6.0%, 95% CI=0.6-23.5%, p=0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with FT-RCT combined with subcoracoid impingement report a slightly higher pain score. Greater superior humeral head migration, coupled with reduced scapular upward rotation, may exacerbate impingement and worsen symptoms. Additionally, these patients exhibit decreased recruitment of the SA and TM muscles. Despite reaching statistical significance, the magnitude of difference may limit its clinical applicability and warrants cautious interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subcoracoid impingement exacerbates pain and scapular dysfunction in full-thickness rotator cuff tears.\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Hsuan Weng, Yang-Ting Chien, Chon-Kio Wong, Jing-Lan Yang, Chung-Hsun Chang, Jiu-Jenq Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jse.2025.08.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subcoracoid impingement co-occurs with subacromial impingement in 19% of patients with rotator cuff tears. The influence of subcoracoid impingement in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tear (FT-RCT) remains unknown. Therefore, it is worthwhile to investigate potential differences between FT-RCT patients with and without subcoracoid impingement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-two participants were categorized as having an FT-RCT combined with subcoracoid impingement, while 25 others were diagnosed with an FT-RCT without subcoracoid impingement. Characteristics and tear sizes were recorded using ultrasonography (USG). Humeral head migration was assessed by calculating the acromiohumeral distance using USG at 0°, 60°, and 90° of shoulder abduction. Shoulder range of motion, pain levels, and self-reported shoulder function were evaluated. Scapular kinematics (upward/downward rotation, anterior/posterior tilt, external/internal rotation) and associated muscle activities (upper trapezius, lower trapezius, serratus anterior [SA] and teres major [TM]) were recorded during arm raising and lowering using motion tracing and surface electromyography systems, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FT-RCT combined with subcoracoid impingement group experienced slightly higher pain levels (1.7±0.6, 95% CI=0.5-2.9, p=0.008) and marginally more humeral head superior migration from 0°-60° shoulder abduction (0.14±0.05 cm, 95% CI=0.03-0.25 cm, p=0.017) compared to the FT-RCT without subcoracoid impingement group. Regarding scapular biomechanics, the FT-RCT combined with subcoracoid impingement group demonstrated decreased upward rotation during arm lowering (4.0±1.3°, 95% CI=1.4-6.5°, p=0.003) as well as decreased SA muscle activation during arm lowering (18.8±8.5%, 95% CI=1.7-36.0%, p=0.032) and decreased TM muscle activation during arm raising (11.4±6.0%, 95% CI=0.6-23.5%, p=0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with FT-RCT combined with subcoracoid impingement report a slightly higher pain score. Greater superior humeral head migration, coupled with reduced scapular upward rotation, may exacerbate impingement and worsen symptoms. Additionally, these patients exhibit decreased recruitment of the SA and TM muscles. Despite reaching statistical significance, the magnitude of difference may limit its clinical applicability and warrants cautious interpretation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2025.08.009\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2025.08.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:19%的肩袖撕裂患者同时发生喙下撞击和肩峰下撞击。喙下撞击对全层肩袖撕裂(FT-RCT)患者的影响尚不清楚。因此,研究有无喙下撞击的FT-RCT患者之间的潜在差异是值得的。方法:22名受试者被归类为FT-RCT合并喙下撞击,而另外25名受试者被诊断为FT-RCT无喙下撞击。超声(USG)记录特征及撕裂大小。通过使用USG计算肩外展0°、60°和90°时的肩肱骨距离来评估肱骨头迁移。评估肩关节活动度、疼痛程度和自我报告的肩关节功能。分别使用运动追踪和表面肌电图系统记录手臂升降过程中肩胛骨的运动学(向上/向下旋转、前后倾斜、外/内旋转)和相关肌肉活动(上斜方肌、下斜方肌、前锯肌[SA]和大圆肌[TM])。结果:与没有喙下撞击的FT-RCT组相比,FT-RCT联合喙下撞击组的疼痛水平略高(1.7±0.6,95% CI=0.5-2.9, p=0.008),肩关节外展0°-60°的肱骨头上移(0.14±0.05 cm, 95% CI=0.03-0.25 cm, p=0.017)。在肩胛骨生物力学方面,FT-RCT联合喙突下撞击组显示,手臂下降时向上旋转减少(4.0±1.3°,95% CI=1.4 ~ 6.5°,p=0.003),手臂下降时SA肌激活减少(18.8±8.5%,95% CI=1.7 ~ 36.0%, p=0.032),手臂上升时TM肌激活减少(11.4±6.0%,95% CI=0.6 ~ 23.5%, p=0.018)。结论:FT-RCT合并喙下撞击的患者疼痛评分略高。肱骨上头大位移,加上肩胛骨上旋减少,可加重撞击并使症状恶化。此外,这些患者表现出SA和TM肌肉的收缩减少。尽管达到统计学意义,但差异的大小可能限制其临床适用性,需要谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Subcoracoid impingement exacerbates pain and scapular dysfunction in full-thickness rotator cuff tears.

Background: Subcoracoid impingement co-occurs with subacromial impingement in 19% of patients with rotator cuff tears. The influence of subcoracoid impingement in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tear (FT-RCT) remains unknown. Therefore, it is worthwhile to investigate potential differences between FT-RCT patients with and without subcoracoid impingement.

Methods: Twenty-two participants were categorized as having an FT-RCT combined with subcoracoid impingement, while 25 others were diagnosed with an FT-RCT without subcoracoid impingement. Characteristics and tear sizes were recorded using ultrasonography (USG). Humeral head migration was assessed by calculating the acromiohumeral distance using USG at 0°, 60°, and 90° of shoulder abduction. Shoulder range of motion, pain levels, and self-reported shoulder function were evaluated. Scapular kinematics (upward/downward rotation, anterior/posterior tilt, external/internal rotation) and associated muscle activities (upper trapezius, lower trapezius, serratus anterior [SA] and teres major [TM]) were recorded during arm raising and lowering using motion tracing and surface electromyography systems, respectively.

Results: The FT-RCT combined with subcoracoid impingement group experienced slightly higher pain levels (1.7±0.6, 95% CI=0.5-2.9, p=0.008) and marginally more humeral head superior migration from 0°-60° shoulder abduction (0.14±0.05 cm, 95% CI=0.03-0.25 cm, p=0.017) compared to the FT-RCT without subcoracoid impingement group. Regarding scapular biomechanics, the FT-RCT combined with subcoracoid impingement group demonstrated decreased upward rotation during arm lowering (4.0±1.3°, 95% CI=1.4-6.5°, p=0.003) as well as decreased SA muscle activation during arm lowering (18.8±8.5%, 95% CI=1.7-36.0%, p=0.032) and decreased TM muscle activation during arm raising (11.4±6.0%, 95% CI=0.6-23.5%, p=0.018).

Conclusion: Patients with FT-RCT combined with subcoracoid impingement report a slightly higher pain score. Greater superior humeral head migration, coupled with reduced scapular upward rotation, may exacerbate impingement and worsen symptoms. Additionally, these patients exhibit decreased recruitment of the SA and TM muscles. Despite reaching statistical significance, the magnitude of difference may limit its clinical applicability and warrants cautious interpretation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信