球囊血管成形术加支架置入或动脉粥样硬化切除术加药物包膜球囊血管成形术在股总动脉血管内修复中的应用。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Camil-Cassien Bamdé, Yann Goueffic, Comlan Blitti, Aline Laubriet, Jean-Michel Davaine, Eric Steinmetz
{"title":"球囊血管成形术加支架置入或动脉粥样硬化切除术加药物包膜球囊血管成形术在股总动脉血管内修复中的应用。","authors":"Camil-Cassien Bamdé, Yann Goueffic, Comlan Blitti, Aline Laubriet, Jean-Michel Davaine, Eric Steinmetz","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.09.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endovascular treatment of common femoral artery (CFA) lesions has emerged as an alternative to surgical endarterectomy, with two main strategies: balloon angioplasty and stenting versus atherectomy plus drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. However, the optimal endovascular approach for CFA lesions remains to be defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study analyzed consecutive patients with symptomatic atheromatous CFA stenosis requiring endovascular treatment between January 2016 and January 2024. Patients were stratified by approach. The primary endpoint was twelve-month primary patency, defined as duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratios ≤2.4 without clinically driven target-lesion revascularization. Secondary endpoints included freedom from target-lesion revascularization, technical success and primary sustained clinical improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 134 limbs of 138 patients were included in the final analysis, 39 in the atherectomy plus DCB group and 95 in the plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) plus stenting group. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups, with mean ages of 74 ± 8 years for atherectomy plus DCB angioplasty and 72 ± 8 years for stenting (p=0.14). Technical success was achieved in 89.2% of atherectomy plus DCB angioplasty cases compared with 92.3% of stenting procedures (p=0.52). The twelve-month primary patency rates were similar between the groups: 79.5% for atherectomy plus DCB angioplasty versus 78.7% for stenting (p=0.71). Freedom from target-lesion revascularization was 92.3% and 85.3%, respectively (p=0.56). Bailout stenting was required in 10% of atherectomy cases, while stent fractures occurred in 5.3% of the stenting cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Atherectomy plus DCB angioplasty and stenting demonstrated similar twelve-month outcomes for CFA lesions. Both strategies represent viable endovascular options. Multicenter randomized trials are warranted to establish optimal treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY PLUS STENTING OR ATHERECTOMY PLUS DRUG-COATED BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY IN ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR OF THE COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY.\",\"authors\":\"Camil-Cassien Bamdé, Yann Goueffic, Comlan Blitti, Aline Laubriet, Jean-Michel Davaine, Eric Steinmetz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.09.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endovascular treatment of common femoral artery (CFA) lesions has emerged as an alternative to surgical endarterectomy, with two main strategies: balloon angioplasty and stenting versus atherectomy plus drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. However, the optimal endovascular approach for CFA lesions remains to be defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study analyzed consecutive patients with symptomatic atheromatous CFA stenosis requiring endovascular treatment between January 2016 and January 2024. Patients were stratified by approach. The primary endpoint was twelve-month primary patency, defined as duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratios ≤2.4 without clinically driven target-lesion revascularization. Secondary endpoints included freedom from target-lesion revascularization, technical success and primary sustained clinical improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 134 limbs of 138 patients were included in the final analysis, 39 in the atherectomy plus DCB group and 95 in the plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) plus stenting group. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups, with mean ages of 74 ± 8 years for atherectomy plus DCB angioplasty and 72 ± 8 years for stenting (p=0.14). Technical success was achieved in 89.2% of atherectomy plus DCB angioplasty cases compared with 92.3% of stenting procedures (p=0.52). The twelve-month primary patency rates were similar between the groups: 79.5% for atherectomy plus DCB angioplasty versus 78.7% for stenting (p=0.71). Freedom from target-lesion revascularization was 92.3% and 85.3%, respectively (p=0.56). Bailout stenting was required in 10% of atherectomy cases, while stent fractures occurred in 5.3% of the stenting cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Atherectomy plus DCB angioplasty and stenting demonstrated similar twelve-month outcomes for CFA lesions. Both strategies represent viable endovascular options. Multicenter randomized trials are warranted to establish optimal treatment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.09.027\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.09.027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:股总动脉(CFA)病变的血管内治疗已经成为手术动脉内膜切除术的替代选择,主要有两种策略:球囊血管成形术和支架置入与动脉粥样硬化切除术加药物包被球囊血管成形术。然而,CFA病变的最佳血管内入路仍有待确定。方法:该单中心回顾性研究分析了2016年1月至2024年1月期间需要血管内治疗的症状性动脉粥样硬化性CFA狭窄患者。患者按入路分层。主要终点为12个月原发性通畅,定义为双超声峰值收缩速度比≤2.4,无临床驱动的靶病变血运重建术。次要终点包括无目标病变血运重建、技术成功和原发性持续临床改善。结果:138例患者共134条肢体纳入最终分析,动脉粥样硬化切除术+ DCB组39例,普通旧球囊血管成形术(POBA) +支架置入术组95例。两组患者的基线人口学和临床特征具有可比性,动脉粥样硬化切除术加DCB血管成形术组的平均年龄为74±8岁,支架置入术组的平均年龄为72±8岁(p=0.14)。在动脉粥样硬化切除术加DCB血管成形术的病例中,89.2%的患者获得了技术上的成功,而支架植入术的成功率为92.3% (p=0.52)。两组间12个月的初级通畅率相似:动脉粥样硬化切除术+ DCB血管成形术组为79.5%,支架置入术组为78.7% (p=0.71)。靶区血管重建率分别为92.3%和85.3% (p=0.56)。10%的动脉粥样硬化切除术病例需要紧急支架置入,而5.3%的支架置入组发生支架骨折。结论:动脉粥样硬化切除术加DCB血管成形术和支架置入术对CFA病变表现出相似的12个月预后。这两种策略都是可行的血管内治疗方案。多中心随机试验是建立最佳治疗策略的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY PLUS STENTING OR ATHERECTOMY PLUS DRUG-COATED BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY IN ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR OF THE COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY.

Background: Endovascular treatment of common femoral artery (CFA) lesions has emerged as an alternative to surgical endarterectomy, with two main strategies: balloon angioplasty and stenting versus atherectomy plus drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. However, the optimal endovascular approach for CFA lesions remains to be defined.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study analyzed consecutive patients with symptomatic atheromatous CFA stenosis requiring endovascular treatment between January 2016 and January 2024. Patients were stratified by approach. The primary endpoint was twelve-month primary patency, defined as duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratios ≤2.4 without clinically driven target-lesion revascularization. Secondary endpoints included freedom from target-lesion revascularization, technical success and primary sustained clinical improvement.

Results: A total of 134 limbs of 138 patients were included in the final analysis, 39 in the atherectomy plus DCB group and 95 in the plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) plus stenting group. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups, with mean ages of 74 ± 8 years for atherectomy plus DCB angioplasty and 72 ± 8 years for stenting (p=0.14). Technical success was achieved in 89.2% of atherectomy plus DCB angioplasty cases compared with 92.3% of stenting procedures (p=0.52). The twelve-month primary patency rates were similar between the groups: 79.5% for atherectomy plus DCB angioplasty versus 78.7% for stenting (p=0.71). Freedom from target-lesion revascularization was 92.3% and 85.3%, respectively (p=0.56). Bailout stenting was required in 10% of atherectomy cases, while stent fractures occurred in 5.3% of the stenting cohort.

Conclusions: Atherectomy plus DCB angioplasty and stenting demonstrated similar twelve-month outcomes for CFA lesions. Both strategies represent viable endovascular options. Multicenter randomized trials are warranted to establish optimal treatment strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信