当代精神神经外科的伦理考虑。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROIMAGING
Justin M Campbell, Brent M Kious, Shervin Rahimpour, Ben Shofty
{"title":"当代精神神经外科的伦理考虑。","authors":"Justin M Campbell, Brent M Kious, Shervin Rahimpour, Ben Shofty","doi":"10.1159/000548528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychiatric neurosurgery has been shaped by an ethically complex history and rapid evolution in neurotechnology. In the modern era, there is a growing need to match the accelerating pace of scientific innovation with rigorous, contemporary ethical frameworks that prioritize patient autonomy, safety, and maintaining public trust.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In this article, we review 21st-century approaches to neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders that combine the precision of modern functional neurosurgery with advances in diagnostic and therapeutic neurotechnology. The ethical issues in contemporary psychiatric neurosurgery are multifaceted and evolving, reflecting the intersection of rapid scientific progress, changing societal values, and a controversial past.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>The four core principles of medical ethics-beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice-and their application to psychiatric neurosurgery are discussed in the context of existing and anticipated ethical issues (e.g., post-trial responsibilities in research, informed consent, disparities in access to care). Finally, we explore how technological breakthroughs, coupled with growing market investment and consumer interest in the field, establish a compelling need to develop robust, forward-looking regulatory frameworks that are aligned with these bioethical principles.</p>","PeriodicalId":22078,"journal":{"name":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contemporary Ethical Considerations in Psychiatric Neurosurgery.\",\"authors\":\"Justin M Campbell, Brent M Kious, Shervin Rahimpour, Ben Shofty\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000548528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychiatric neurosurgery has been shaped by an ethically complex history and rapid evolution in neurotechnology. In the modern era, there is a growing need to match the accelerating pace of scientific innovation with rigorous, contemporary ethical frameworks that prioritize patient autonomy, safety, and maintaining public trust.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In this article, we review 21st-century approaches to neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders that combine the precision of modern functional neurosurgery with advances in diagnostic and therapeutic neurotechnology. The ethical issues in contemporary psychiatric neurosurgery are multifaceted and evolving, reflecting the intersection of rapid scientific progress, changing societal values, and a controversial past.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>The four core principles of medical ethics-beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice-and their application to psychiatric neurosurgery are discussed in the context of existing and anticipated ethical issues (e.g., post-trial responsibilities in research, informed consent, disparities in access to care). Finally, we explore how technological breakthroughs, coupled with growing market investment and consumer interest in the field, establish a compelling need to develop robust, forward-looking regulatory frameworks that are aligned with these bioethical principles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548528\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548528","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:精神神经外科是由复杂的伦理历史和神经技术的快速发展所塑造的。在当今时代,越来越需要将科学创新的加速步伐与严格的当代伦理框架相匹配,这些框架优先考虑患者自主、安全和维护公众信任。摘要:在这篇文章中,我们回顾了21世纪神经外科治疗精神疾病的方法,这些方法结合了现代功能神经外科的精确性和诊断和治疗神经技术的进步。当代精神神经外科的伦理问题是多方面的和不断发展的,反映了快速的科学进步,不断变化的社会价值观和有争议的过去的交集。关键信息:医学伦理学的四个核心原则——慈善、无害、自主和公正——以及它们在精神神经外科中的应用,在现有和预期的伦理问题(例如,研究中的试验后责任、知情同意、获得护理的差异)的背景下进行了讨论。最后,我们探讨了技术突破,加上不断增长的市场投资和消费者对该领域的兴趣,如何建立一个迫切需要,制定与这些生物伦理原则相一致的强大的、前瞻性的监管框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contemporary Ethical Considerations in Psychiatric Neurosurgery.

Background: Psychiatric neurosurgery has been shaped by an ethically complex history and rapid evolution in neurotechnology. In the modern era, there is a growing need to match the accelerating pace of scientific innovation with rigorous, contemporary ethical frameworks that prioritize patient autonomy, safety, and maintaining public trust.

Summary: In this article, we review 21st-century approaches to neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders that combine the precision of modern functional neurosurgery with advances in diagnostic and therapeutic neurotechnology. The ethical issues in contemporary psychiatric neurosurgery are multifaceted and evolving, reflecting the intersection of rapid scientific progress, changing societal values, and a controversial past.

Key messages: The four core principles of medical ethics-beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice-and their application to psychiatric neurosurgery are discussed in the context of existing and anticipated ethical issues (e.g., post-trial responsibilities in research, informed consent, disparities in access to care). Finally, we explore how technological breakthroughs, coupled with growing market investment and consumer interest in the field, establish a compelling need to develop robust, forward-looking regulatory frameworks that are aligned with these bioethical principles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: ''Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery'' provides a single source for the reader to keep abreast of developments in the most rapidly advancing subspecialty within neurosurgery. Technological advances in computer-assisted surgery, robotics, imaging and neurophysiology are being applied to clinical problems with ever-increasing rapidity in stereotaxis more than any other field, providing opportunities for new approaches to surgical and radiotherapeutic management of diseases of the brain, spinal cord, and spine. Issues feature advances in the use of deep-brain stimulation, imaging-guided techniques in stereotactic biopsy and craniotomy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and stereotactically implanted and guided radiotherapeutics and biologicals in the treatment of functional and movement disorders, brain tumors, and other diseases of the brain. Background information from basic science laboratories related to such clinical advances provides the reader with an overall perspective of this field. Proceedings and abstracts from many of the key international meetings furnish an overview of this specialty available nowhere else. ''Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery'' meets the information needs of both investigators and clinicians in this rapidly advancing field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信