术后应用利多卡因后,电刺激疗法加速神经再生仍然有效。

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
HAND Pub Date : 2025-09-21 DOI:10.1177/15589447251369034
Cameron F Leveille, Michael P Willand, Katelyn J W So, Leah N Barlow, Emma Patchett, Jie Li, Kyla N Sask, James R Bain
{"title":"术后应用利多卡因后,电刺激疗法加速神经再生仍然有效。","authors":"Cameron F Leveille, Michael P Willand, Katelyn J W So, Leah N Barlow, Emma Patchett, Jie Li, Kyla N Sask, James R Bain","doi":"10.1177/15589447251369034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brief electrical stimulation (ES) of injured peripheral nerves for 1 hour has been shown to accelerate nerve regeneration with proximal action potential conduction to the neuron cell body, a requirement to elicit therapeutic benefit. Local anesthetic is often used to manage pain in patients. However, using lidocaine after ES therapy has been controversial. We assessed the effects of extraneural usage of lidocaine after ES therapy on nerve regeneration in a rodent nerve injury model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lewis rats underwent tibial nerve transection and immediate repair and randomized to 4 groups: control (REP), extraneural lidocaine alone (REP + LIDO), 60-minute ES (60 ES), and 60-minute ES with extraneural lidocaine (60 ES + LIDO). The tibial nerve was retrograde labeled distally from the neurorrhaphy 28 days post repair. Spinal cords and dorsal root ganglia were harvested to assess motor and sensory neuron counts. Data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a post-hoc Tukey correction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using lidocaine after nerve repair did not affect nerve regeneration in the control group (REP vs REP + LIDO) or ES group (60 ES vs 60 ES + LIDO), with motor and sensory neuron counts not statistically different between groups. Electrical stimulation therapy showed at least a 60% increase in motor and sensory neuron counts than controls, a statistically significant effect (<i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Extraneural usage of lidocaine after ES does not abolish the improved effect of ES on nerve regeneration. Future clinical studies should evaluate the usage of subcutaneous injection of lidocaine post ES for analgesia control.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":" ","pages":"15589447251369034"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450895/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrical Stimulation Therapy to Accelerate Nerve Regeneration Remains Effective Following Postoperative Application of Lidocaine.\",\"authors\":\"Cameron F Leveille, Michael P Willand, Katelyn J W So, Leah N Barlow, Emma Patchett, Jie Li, Kyla N Sask, James R Bain\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15589447251369034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brief electrical stimulation (ES) of injured peripheral nerves for 1 hour has been shown to accelerate nerve regeneration with proximal action potential conduction to the neuron cell body, a requirement to elicit therapeutic benefit. Local anesthetic is often used to manage pain in patients. However, using lidocaine after ES therapy has been controversial. We assessed the effects of extraneural usage of lidocaine after ES therapy on nerve regeneration in a rodent nerve injury model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lewis rats underwent tibial nerve transection and immediate repair and randomized to 4 groups: control (REP), extraneural lidocaine alone (REP + LIDO), 60-minute ES (60 ES), and 60-minute ES with extraneural lidocaine (60 ES + LIDO). The tibial nerve was retrograde labeled distally from the neurorrhaphy 28 days post repair. Spinal cords and dorsal root ganglia were harvested to assess motor and sensory neuron counts. Data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a post-hoc Tukey correction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using lidocaine after nerve repair did not affect nerve regeneration in the control group (REP vs REP + LIDO) or ES group (60 ES vs 60 ES + LIDO), with motor and sensory neuron counts not statistically different between groups. Electrical stimulation therapy showed at least a 60% increase in motor and sensory neuron counts than controls, a statistically significant effect (<i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Extraneural usage of lidocaine after ES does not abolish the improved effect of ES on nerve regeneration. Future clinical studies should evaluate the usage of subcutaneous injection of lidocaine post ES for analgesia control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HAND\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15589447251369034\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450895/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HAND\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447251369034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447251369034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对损伤的周围神经进行1小时的短暂电刺激(ES)已被证明可以加速神经再生并将近端动作电位传导到神经元细胞体,这是获得治疗效果的必要条件。局部麻醉常用于治疗病人的疼痛。然而,在ES治疗后使用利多卡因一直存在争议。我们在啮齿动物神经损伤模型中评估了ES治疗后神经外使用利多卡因对神经再生的影响。方法:Lewis大鼠行胫神经截断即刻修复术,随机分为4组:对照组(REP)、神经外单独利多卡因组(REP + LIDO)、60分钟ES组(60分钟ES)和60分钟ES联合神经外利多卡因组(60分钟ES + LIDO)。胫骨神经在修复后28天逆行远端标记。收集脊髓和背根神经节以评估运动和感觉神经元计数。数据分析采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和事后Tukey校正。结果:神经修复后使用利多卡因对对照组(REP vs REP + LIDO)和ES组(60 ES vs 60 ES + LIDO)的神经再生无影响,两组间运动神经元和感觉神经元计数无统计学差异。电刺激治疗显示运动和感觉神经元计数比对照组至少增加60%,具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。结论:ES术后神经外使用利多卡因并不能消除ES对神经再生的改善作用。未来的临床研究应评估麻醉后皮下注射利多卡因对镇痛控制的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electrical Stimulation Therapy to Accelerate Nerve Regeneration Remains Effective Following Postoperative Application of Lidocaine.

Background: Brief electrical stimulation (ES) of injured peripheral nerves for 1 hour has been shown to accelerate nerve regeneration with proximal action potential conduction to the neuron cell body, a requirement to elicit therapeutic benefit. Local anesthetic is often used to manage pain in patients. However, using lidocaine after ES therapy has been controversial. We assessed the effects of extraneural usage of lidocaine after ES therapy on nerve regeneration in a rodent nerve injury model.

Methods: Lewis rats underwent tibial nerve transection and immediate repair and randomized to 4 groups: control (REP), extraneural lidocaine alone (REP + LIDO), 60-minute ES (60 ES), and 60-minute ES with extraneural lidocaine (60 ES + LIDO). The tibial nerve was retrograde labeled distally from the neurorrhaphy 28 days post repair. Spinal cords and dorsal root ganglia were harvested to assess motor and sensory neuron counts. Data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a post-hoc Tukey correction.

Results: Using lidocaine after nerve repair did not affect nerve regeneration in the control group (REP vs REP + LIDO) or ES group (60 ES vs 60 ES + LIDO), with motor and sensory neuron counts not statistically different between groups. Electrical stimulation therapy showed at least a 60% increase in motor and sensory neuron counts than controls, a statistically significant effect (P < .001).

Conclusions: Extraneural usage of lidocaine after ES does not abolish the improved effect of ES on nerve regeneration. Future clinical studies should evaluate the usage of subcutaneous injection of lidocaine post ES for analgesia control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HAND
HAND Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信