Joanna Curry, Christian de Virgilio, Ramsey Ugarte, Kyle Wright, Maria Valadez, Mark Archie
{"title":"动静脉血液透析通路创建过程中手术部位感染与抗生素预防的关系。","authors":"Joanna Curry, Christian de Virgilio, Ramsey Ugarte, Kyle Wright, Maria Valadez, Mark Archie","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.09.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended in vascular surgery procedures, especially when implanting prosthetic materials. However, there is a paucity of data regarding their usage or efficacy for hemodialysis (HD) access procedures, especially when an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is planned.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing AVF for HD access between 2014 and 2019 was conducted from five safety net hospitals within the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services system. The primary endpoint was surgical site infection (SSI) at 30 days. The secondary endpoint was the usage of antibiotics and variability by surgeon and hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were a total of 1,404 patients, of which 1,198 (85.3%) patients received antibiotic prophylaxis. The proportion of patients receiving antibiotics decreased from 94.8% to 82.9% over the study period (nptrend<0.02). Hospital specific rates of prophylactic antibiotic use varied significantly from 77.0% to 99.2% (p<0.001). Further, there was significant variation in rates of perioperative antibiotics utilization by surgeon, ranging from 0% to 100% (mean: 84.4%, p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in age (p=0.119), sex (p=0.211), and BMI (p=0.888) for patients who received antibiotics and those who did not. The overall rate of SSI at 30 days was 1.1% (n=15), with no difference for patients who received antibiotic prophylaxis and those who did not (n=12, 1.0% vs. n=3, 1.5%, p=0.55).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present analysis identified hospital and surgeon level variability in the use of prophylactic antibiotics. Prophylactic antibiotics were no associated with a significant reduction in SSI rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Surgical Site Infections and Antibiotic Prophylaxis During Arteriovenous Hemodialysis Access Creation.\",\"authors\":\"Joanna Curry, Christian de Virgilio, Ramsey Ugarte, Kyle Wright, Maria Valadez, Mark Archie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.09.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended in vascular surgery procedures, especially when implanting prosthetic materials. However, there is a paucity of data regarding their usage or efficacy for hemodialysis (HD) access procedures, especially when an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is planned.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing AVF for HD access between 2014 and 2019 was conducted from five safety net hospitals within the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services system. The primary endpoint was surgical site infection (SSI) at 30 days. The secondary endpoint was the usage of antibiotics and variability by surgeon and hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were a total of 1,404 patients, of which 1,198 (85.3%) patients received antibiotic prophylaxis. The proportion of patients receiving antibiotics decreased from 94.8% to 82.9% over the study period (nptrend<0.02). Hospital specific rates of prophylactic antibiotic use varied significantly from 77.0% to 99.2% (p<0.001). Further, there was significant variation in rates of perioperative antibiotics utilization by surgeon, ranging from 0% to 100% (mean: 84.4%, p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in age (p=0.119), sex (p=0.211), and BMI (p=0.888) for patients who received antibiotics and those who did not. The overall rate of SSI at 30 days was 1.1% (n=15), with no difference for patients who received antibiotic prophylaxis and those who did not (n=12, 1.0% vs. n=3, 1.5%, p=0.55).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present analysis identified hospital and surgeon level variability in the use of prophylactic antibiotics. Prophylactic antibiotics were no associated with a significant reduction in SSI rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.09.026\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.09.026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Association Between Surgical Site Infections and Antibiotic Prophylaxis During Arteriovenous Hemodialysis Access Creation.
Background: Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended in vascular surgery procedures, especially when implanting prosthetic materials. However, there is a paucity of data regarding their usage or efficacy for hemodialysis (HD) access procedures, especially when an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is planned.
Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing AVF for HD access between 2014 and 2019 was conducted from five safety net hospitals within the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services system. The primary endpoint was surgical site infection (SSI) at 30 days. The secondary endpoint was the usage of antibiotics and variability by surgeon and hospital.
Results: There were a total of 1,404 patients, of which 1,198 (85.3%) patients received antibiotic prophylaxis. The proportion of patients receiving antibiotics decreased from 94.8% to 82.9% over the study period (nptrend<0.02). Hospital specific rates of prophylactic antibiotic use varied significantly from 77.0% to 99.2% (p<0.001). Further, there was significant variation in rates of perioperative antibiotics utilization by surgeon, ranging from 0% to 100% (mean: 84.4%, p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in age (p=0.119), sex (p=0.211), and BMI (p=0.888) for patients who received antibiotics and those who did not. The overall rate of SSI at 30 days was 1.1% (n=15), with no difference for patients who received antibiotic prophylaxis and those who did not (n=12, 1.0% vs. n=3, 1.5%, p=0.55).
Conclusion: The present analysis identified hospital and surgeon level variability in the use of prophylactic antibiotics. Prophylactic antibiotics were no associated with a significant reduction in SSI rates.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal:
Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials)
Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work)
Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients)
General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic)
Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery
Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers)
Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery)
Editorials/Correspondence