志愿者拓展和预测模型:初级保健安全网中新患者就诊的快速随机质量改进项目

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kevin Chen, Khera Bailey, Simon Nemytov, Kenan Katranji, Michael Bouton, Andrew B. Wallach, Hannah B. Jackson
{"title":"志愿者拓展和预测模型:初级保健安全网中新患者就诊的快速随机质量改进项目","authors":"Kevin Chen,&nbsp;Khera Bailey,&nbsp;Simon Nemytov,&nbsp;Kenan Katranji,&nbsp;Michael Bouton,&nbsp;Andrew B. Wallach,&nbsp;Hannah B. Jackson","doi":"10.1111/jep.70278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Nonattendance at new patient appointments leads to missed opportunities for engagement in care, lost revenue, and suboptimal resource utilization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the effectiveness of outreach calls to new patients, prioritized by a no-show predictive algorithm and conducted by volunteers, on visit attendance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Rapid randomized quality improvement project.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with new patient appointments at an urban safety-net adult primary care clinic scheduled to occur between August 1, 2024 and September 30, 2024.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Intervention</h3>\n \n <p>Estimated probability of visit no-show for patients was calculated using a predictive algorithm embedded in the electronic health record and used to sort lists of patients with upcoming appointments. Every other patient received an outreach call from a trained volunteer within 3 business days of their appointment plus usual automated reminder messages versus usual automated reminder messages alone.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Measures</h3>\n \n <p>New patient visit attendance compared between intervention and control groups. We conducted subgroup analyses of attendance by visit modality (in-person vs. telehealth), preferred language, and quartile of predicted no-show probability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Key Results</h3>\n \n <p>Patients in the intervention group (<i>n</i> = 281) had higher visit attendance than those in the control group (<i>n</i> = 280): 68.0% versus 54.1% (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). There was a significant difference in attendance for in-person (70.7% vs. 51.7%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) but not telehealth (60.6% vs. 61.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.94) visits. Patients who preferred English had the biggest increase in attendance (17.2%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Patients in the second and third quartiles of predicted no-show probability (31%–38% and 39%–45% predicted probability) had the biggest increases in attendance (22.2% [<i>p</i> = 0.01] and 15.4% [<i>p</i> = 0.05]).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Outreach calls for new patients, prioritized by a no-show predictive algorithm and conducted by volunteers, can be a feasible and effective approach to improving visit attendance in a targeted fashion. Further investigation is needed to understand how to better support non-English preferring patients and patients with telehealth appointments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volunteer Outreach and Predictive Modeling: Rapid Randomized Quality Improvement Project for New Patient Attendance in a Primary Care Safety-Net\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Chen,&nbsp;Khera Bailey,&nbsp;Simon Nemytov,&nbsp;Kenan Katranji,&nbsp;Michael Bouton,&nbsp;Andrew B. Wallach,&nbsp;Hannah B. Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Nonattendance at new patient appointments leads to missed opportunities for engagement in care, lost revenue, and suboptimal resource utilization.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess the effectiveness of outreach calls to new patients, prioritized by a no-show predictive algorithm and conducted by volunteers, on visit attendance.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Rapid randomized quality improvement project.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Participants</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients with new patient appointments at an urban safety-net adult primary care clinic scheduled to occur between August 1, 2024 and September 30, 2024.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Intervention</h3>\\n \\n <p>Estimated probability of visit no-show for patients was calculated using a predictive algorithm embedded in the electronic health record and used to sort lists of patients with upcoming appointments. Every other patient received an outreach call from a trained volunteer within 3 business days of their appointment plus usual automated reminder messages versus usual automated reminder messages alone.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Measures</h3>\\n \\n <p>New patient visit attendance compared between intervention and control groups. We conducted subgroup analyses of attendance by visit modality (in-person vs. telehealth), preferred language, and quartile of predicted no-show probability.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Key Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients in the intervention group (<i>n</i> = 281) had higher visit attendance than those in the control group (<i>n</i> = 280): 68.0% versus 54.1% (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). There was a significant difference in attendance for in-person (70.7% vs. 51.7%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) but not telehealth (60.6% vs. 61.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.94) visits. Patients who preferred English had the biggest increase in attendance (17.2%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Patients in the second and third quartiles of predicted no-show probability (31%–38% and 39%–45% predicted probability) had the biggest increases in attendance (22.2% [<i>p</i> = 0.01] and 15.4% [<i>p</i> = 0.05]).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Outreach calls for new patients, prioritized by a no-show predictive algorithm and conducted by volunteers, can be a feasible and effective approach to improving visit attendance in a targeted fashion. Further investigation is needed to understand how to better support non-English preferring patients and patients with telehealth appointments.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70278\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70278","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新患者预约不出席导致错过参与护理的机会、收入损失和资源利用不理想。目的评估对新患者外展电话的有效性,该外展电话采用未到预测算法进行优先排序,并由志愿者进行。设计快速随机质量改进项目。在2024年8月1日至2024年9月30日期间在城市安全网成人初级保健诊所预约新患者的患者。干预措施使用嵌入在电子健康记录中的预测算法计算患者未赴约的估计概率,并用于对即将预约的患者列表进行排序。其他每位患者在预约后的3个工作日内,都会收到一位训练有素的志愿者打来的外展电话,再加上常规的自动提醒信息,而不是常规的自动提醒信息。主要措施干预组与对照组新患者就诊率比较。我们通过访问方式(面对面与远程医疗)、首选语言和预测缺席概率的四分位数对出勤进行了亚组分析。干预组(n = 281)患者的访诊出勤率高于对照组(n = 280): 68.0%比54.1% (p < 0.01)。现场就诊的出勤率有显著差异(70.7% vs. 51.7%; p < 0.01),但远程医疗就诊的出勤率无显著差异(60.6% vs. 61.2%; p = 0.94)。偏爱英语的患者出勤率增加最多(17.2%;p < 0.01)。预测缺席概率的第二和第三四分位数(预测概率分别为31%-38%和39%-45%)患者的出勤率增幅最大(分别为22.2% [p = 0.01]和15.4% [p = 0.05])。结论对新患者进行外展呼吁,采用无就诊预测算法进行优先排序,并由志愿者进行,是一种有针对性地提高出勤率的可行而有效的方法。需要进一步调查以了解如何更好地支持非英语偏好患者和远程医疗预约患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Volunteer Outreach and Predictive Modeling: Rapid Randomized Quality Improvement Project for New Patient Attendance in a Primary Care Safety-Net

Background

Nonattendance at new patient appointments leads to missed opportunities for engagement in care, lost revenue, and suboptimal resource utilization.

Objective

To assess the effectiveness of outreach calls to new patients, prioritized by a no-show predictive algorithm and conducted by volunteers, on visit attendance.

Design

Rapid randomized quality improvement project.

Participants

Patients with new patient appointments at an urban safety-net adult primary care clinic scheduled to occur between August 1, 2024 and September 30, 2024.

Intervention

Estimated probability of visit no-show for patients was calculated using a predictive algorithm embedded in the electronic health record and used to sort lists of patients with upcoming appointments. Every other patient received an outreach call from a trained volunteer within 3 business days of their appointment plus usual automated reminder messages versus usual automated reminder messages alone.

Main Measures

New patient visit attendance compared between intervention and control groups. We conducted subgroup analyses of attendance by visit modality (in-person vs. telehealth), preferred language, and quartile of predicted no-show probability.

Key Results

Patients in the intervention group (n = 281) had higher visit attendance than those in the control group (n = 280): 68.0% versus 54.1% (p < 0.01). There was a significant difference in attendance for in-person (70.7% vs. 51.7%; p < 0.01) but not telehealth (60.6% vs. 61.2%; p = 0.94) visits. Patients who preferred English had the biggest increase in attendance (17.2%; p < 0.01). Patients in the second and third quartiles of predicted no-show probability (31%–38% and 39%–45% predicted probability) had the biggest increases in attendance (22.2% [p = 0.01] and 15.4% [p = 0.05]).

Conclusions

Outreach calls for new patients, prioritized by a no-show predictive algorithm and conducted by volunteers, can be a feasible and effective approach to improving visit attendance in a targeted fashion. Further investigation is needed to understand how to better support non-English preferring patients and patients with telehealth appointments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信