废气再循环影响下农用柴油机橡胶籽油甲酯-柴油共混物的能源、火用和环境评价

IF 2.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
S. Murugapoopathi, V. Manieniyan, C. Rajaganapathy, R. Sathiyamoorthi, K. Thiruselvam, Damodharan Dillikannan
{"title":"废气再循环影响下农用柴油机橡胶籽油甲酯-柴油共混物的能源、火用和环境评价","authors":"S. Murugapoopathi,&nbsp;V. Manieniyan,&nbsp;C. Rajaganapathy,&nbsp;R. Sathiyamoorthi,&nbsp;K. Thiruselvam,&nbsp;Damodharan Dillikannan","doi":"10.1002/ep.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of this study is to investigate the outcomes of fueling a diesel engine with biodiesel and recirculating the exhaust gases (EGR). The MRSO 30%'s destroyed energy and unaccounted losses fell by 6.72% and 2.33%, respectively, when compared to petroleum diesel. Diesel reduced the destroyed availability of MRSO 10%, 20%, and 30% by 66.67%, 66.93%, and 67.51%, respectively. In comparison to diesel, the exhaust gas availability and unexplained loss were decreased by 48.18% and 17.14%, respectively. The improvement in the trend towards diesel and MRSO 0%EGR was demonstrated by the availability of fuel with input energy of MRSO 10%, MRSO 20%, and MRSO 30%. Shaft availability and engine cooling water were improved for MRSO 30% with diesel under the same operating conditions by 32.41% and 5.84%, respectively. When compared to diesel for maximum load, the second law efficiency of MRSO 0%, MRSO 10%, MRSO 20%, and MRSO 30% was improved by 12%, 23.64%, 17.36%, and 6.32%, respectively. With high loads, the usage of EGR often results in an increase in BSCO, and BSHC emissions. It was discovered that the usage of 10% EGR was sufficient to reliably reduce BSCO, BSHC, and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions at low and moderate loads.</p>","PeriodicalId":11701,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy","volume":"44 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy, exergy and environmental assessments of rubber seed oil methyl ester-diesel blend for an agricultural diesel engine under the influence of exhaust gas recirculation\",\"authors\":\"S. Murugapoopathi,&nbsp;V. Manieniyan,&nbsp;C. Rajaganapathy,&nbsp;R. Sathiyamoorthi,&nbsp;K. Thiruselvam,&nbsp;Damodharan Dillikannan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ep.70011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The purpose of this study is to investigate the outcomes of fueling a diesel engine with biodiesel and recirculating the exhaust gases (EGR). The MRSO 30%'s destroyed energy and unaccounted losses fell by 6.72% and 2.33%, respectively, when compared to petroleum diesel. Diesel reduced the destroyed availability of MRSO 10%, 20%, and 30% by 66.67%, 66.93%, and 67.51%, respectively. In comparison to diesel, the exhaust gas availability and unexplained loss were decreased by 48.18% and 17.14%, respectively. The improvement in the trend towards diesel and MRSO 0%EGR was demonstrated by the availability of fuel with input energy of MRSO 10%, MRSO 20%, and MRSO 30%. Shaft availability and engine cooling water were improved for MRSO 30% with diesel under the same operating conditions by 32.41% and 5.84%, respectively. When compared to diesel for maximum load, the second law efficiency of MRSO 0%, MRSO 10%, MRSO 20%, and MRSO 30% was improved by 12%, 23.64%, 17.36%, and 6.32%, respectively. With high loads, the usage of EGR often results in an increase in BSCO, and BSHC emissions. It was discovered that the usage of 10% EGR was sufficient to reliably reduce BSCO, BSHC, and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions at low and moderate loads.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy\",\"volume\":\"44 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://aiche.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ep.70011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://aiche.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ep.70011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨柴油发动机使用生物柴油和废气再循环(EGR)的结果。与石油柴油相比,MRSO 30%的破坏能量和未统计损失分别下降了6.72%和2.33%。柴油对MRSO 10%、20%和30%的破坏有效性分别降低66.67%、66.93%和67.51%。与柴油相比,废气可用性和不明原因损失分别下降了48.18%和17.14%。在输入能量为MRSO 10%、MRSO 20%和MRSO 30%的情况下,燃料的可用性证明了柴油和MRSO 0%EGR趋势的改善。在相同工况下,MRSO 30%加柴油时,轴的可用性和发动机冷却水分别提高了32.41%和5.84%。在最大负荷工况下,与柴油相比,MRSO 0%、MRSO 10%、MRSO 20%和MRSO 30%的第二定律效率分别提高了12%、23.64%、17.36%和6.32%。在高负荷情况下,EGR的使用通常会导致BSCO和BSHC排放的增加。研究发现,在低负荷和中等负荷下,使用10%的EGR足以可靠地减少BSCO、BSHC和NOx排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Energy, exergy and environmental assessments of rubber seed oil methyl ester-diesel blend for an agricultural diesel engine under the influence of exhaust gas recirculation

Energy, exergy and environmental assessments of rubber seed oil methyl ester-diesel blend for an agricultural diesel engine under the influence of exhaust gas recirculation

Energy, exergy and environmental assessments of rubber seed oil methyl ester-diesel blend for an agricultural diesel engine under the influence of exhaust gas recirculation

Energy, exergy and environmental assessments of rubber seed oil methyl ester-diesel blend for an agricultural diesel engine under the influence of exhaust gas recirculation

The purpose of this study is to investigate the outcomes of fueling a diesel engine with biodiesel and recirculating the exhaust gases (EGR). The MRSO 30%'s destroyed energy and unaccounted losses fell by 6.72% and 2.33%, respectively, when compared to petroleum diesel. Diesel reduced the destroyed availability of MRSO 10%, 20%, and 30% by 66.67%, 66.93%, and 67.51%, respectively. In comparison to diesel, the exhaust gas availability and unexplained loss were decreased by 48.18% and 17.14%, respectively. The improvement in the trend towards diesel and MRSO 0%EGR was demonstrated by the availability of fuel with input energy of MRSO 10%, MRSO 20%, and MRSO 30%. Shaft availability and engine cooling water were improved for MRSO 30% with diesel under the same operating conditions by 32.41% and 5.84%, respectively. When compared to diesel for maximum load, the second law efficiency of MRSO 0%, MRSO 10%, MRSO 20%, and MRSO 30% was improved by 12%, 23.64%, 17.36%, and 6.32%, respectively. With high loads, the usage of EGR often results in an increase in BSCO, and BSHC emissions. It was discovered that the usage of 10% EGR was sufficient to reliably reduce BSCO, BSHC, and NOx emissions at low and moderate loads.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Progress , a quarterly publication of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, reports on critical issues like remediation and treatment of solid or aqueous wastes, air pollution, sustainability, and sustainable energy. Each issue helps chemical engineers (and those in related fields) stay on top of technological advances in all areas associated with the environment through feature articles, updates, book and software reviews, and editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信