{"title":"用定量描述分析和pivot - ata方法评价面霜的感觉","authors":"Liling Chu, Rong Qi, Dangdang Cheng","doi":"10.1111/joss.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Pivot-CATA (Pivot Profile Variant Using CATA) was utilized in the sensory evaluation of facial creams, employing a semi-trained panel. This approach offered a rapid method of assessing product attributes, and the results were similar to those of Descriptive Analysis (DA) with a trained panel: product Y was perceived as having a higher intensity of refreshing, watery, and spreadable than product M; product M was perceived as having a higher intensity of thickness and stickiness than product Y. The RV values of Pivot-CATA with product P1 and product P2 as Pivot products and DA were 0.840 and 0.814, respectively. The semi-trained panelists performed well during the evaluation and can partially replace the well-trained panelists in the sensory evaluation of facial creams. Pivot-CATA was a practical alternative to DA. Based on the results of Principal Component Analysis of the DA, different products (product P1 and product P2) which were in the middle position of the PCA biplot of DA, were selected as Pivot products for the Pivot-CATA evaluation and showed very similar results (RV value of 0.925). The choice of Pivot products had a minor influence on the test result.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sensory Studies","volume":"40 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensory Evaluation of Facial Creams With Quantitative Descriptive Analysis and Pivot-CATA Methods\",\"authors\":\"Liling Chu, Rong Qi, Dangdang Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joss.70072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Pivot-CATA (Pivot Profile Variant Using CATA) was utilized in the sensory evaluation of facial creams, employing a semi-trained panel. This approach offered a rapid method of assessing product attributes, and the results were similar to those of Descriptive Analysis (DA) with a trained panel: product Y was perceived as having a higher intensity of refreshing, watery, and spreadable than product M; product M was perceived as having a higher intensity of thickness and stickiness than product Y. The RV values of Pivot-CATA with product P1 and product P2 as Pivot products and DA were 0.840 and 0.814, respectively. The semi-trained panelists performed well during the evaluation and can partially replace the well-trained panelists in the sensory evaluation of facial creams. Pivot-CATA was a practical alternative to DA. Based on the results of Principal Component Analysis of the DA, different products (product P1 and product P2) which were in the middle position of the PCA biplot of DA, were selected as Pivot products for the Pivot-CATA evaluation and showed very similar results (RV value of 0.925). The choice of Pivot products had a minor influence on the test result.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sensory Studies\",\"volume\":\"40 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sensory Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joss.70072\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sensory Studies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joss.70072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
采用半训练面板,Pivot-CATA (Pivot Profile Variant Using CATA)用于面霜的感官评估。这种方法提供了一种快速评估产品属性的方法,结果与经过训练的小组的描述性分析(DA)的结果相似:产品Y被认为比产品M具有更高的清爽、湿润和可涂抹的强度;产品M被认为比产品y具有更高的厚度强度和粘性。产品P1和产品P2作为Pivot产品的Pivot- cata的RV值和DA分别为0.840和0.814。半训练小组成员在评估中表现良好,可以部分替代训练有素的小组成员进行面霜的感官评估。Pivot-CATA是数据处理的一种实用替代方案。根据DA主成分分析结果,选取位于DA主成分双图中间位置的不同产品(P1和P2)作为Pivot产品进行Pivot- cata评价,结果非常相似(RV值为0.925)。Pivot产品的选择对试验结果影响较小。
Sensory Evaluation of Facial Creams With Quantitative Descriptive Analysis and Pivot-CATA Methods
Pivot-CATA (Pivot Profile Variant Using CATA) was utilized in the sensory evaluation of facial creams, employing a semi-trained panel. This approach offered a rapid method of assessing product attributes, and the results were similar to those of Descriptive Analysis (DA) with a trained panel: product Y was perceived as having a higher intensity of refreshing, watery, and spreadable than product M; product M was perceived as having a higher intensity of thickness and stickiness than product Y. The RV values of Pivot-CATA with product P1 and product P2 as Pivot products and DA were 0.840 and 0.814, respectively. The semi-trained panelists performed well during the evaluation and can partially replace the well-trained panelists in the sensory evaluation of facial creams. Pivot-CATA was a practical alternative to DA. Based on the results of Principal Component Analysis of the DA, different products (product P1 and product P2) which were in the middle position of the PCA biplot of DA, were selected as Pivot products for the Pivot-CATA evaluation and showed very similar results (RV value of 0.925). The choice of Pivot products had a minor influence on the test result.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sensory Studies publishes original research and review articles, as well as expository and tutorial papers focusing on observational and experimental studies that lead to development and application of sensory and consumer (including behavior) methods to products such as food and beverage, medical, agricultural, biological, pharmaceutical, cosmetics, or other materials; information such as marketing and consumer information; or improvement of services based on sensory methods. All papers should show some advancement of sensory science in terms of methods. The journal does NOT publish papers that focus primarily on the application of standard sensory techniques to experimental variations in products unless the authors can show a unique application of sensory in an unusual way or in a new product category where sensory methods usually have not been applied.