{"title":"流动模拟和科学数据压缩基准的模型网格","authors":"Laurent Duval, Frédéric Payan, Christophe Preux, Lauriane Bouard","doi":"10.1002/gdj3.70030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The volume of scientific data produced for and by numerical simulation workflows is increasing at an incredible rate. This raises concerns either in computability, interpretability, and sustainability. This is especially noticeable in earth science (geology, meteorology, oceanography, and astronomy), notably with climate studies. We highlight five main evaluation issues: efficiency, discrepancy, diversity, interpretability, availability. Among remedies, lossless and lossy compression techniques are becoming popular to better manage dataset volumes. Performance assessment—with comparative benchmarks—requires open datasets shared under FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable), provided in a MWE (Minimal Working Example) with ancillary data for reuse. We share <span>Lundi</span><sub>sim</sub>, an exemplary faulted geological mesh. It is inspired by the SPE10 comparative Challenge. It is not meant to be compared to the latter for reservoir simulation. It is instead tailored—with power-of-two dimensions and additional faults—to both more challenging fluid displacement and upscaling methods, and allowing versatile compression benchmarks. Enhanced by porosity/permeability datasets, this dataset proposes four distinct subsurface environments. They were primarily designed for flow simulation in porous media. Several consistent resolutions (with HexaShrink multiscale representations) are proposed for each model. We also provide a set of reservoir features for reproducing typical two-phase flow simulations on all <span>Lundi</span><sub>sim</sub> models in a reservoir engineering context. This dataset is chiefly meant for benchmarking and evaluating data size reduction (upscaling) or genuine composite mesh compression algorithms. It is also suitable for other advanced mesh processing workflows in geology and reservoir engineering, from visualisation to machine learning. <span>Lundi</span><sub>sim</sub> meshes are available at 10.5281/zenodo.14641958.</p>","PeriodicalId":54351,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience Data Journal","volume":"12 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gdj3.70030","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lundisim: Model Meshes for Flow Simulation and Scientific Data Compression Benchmarks\",\"authors\":\"Laurent Duval, Frédéric Payan, Christophe Preux, Lauriane Bouard\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/gdj3.70030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The volume of scientific data produced for and by numerical simulation workflows is increasing at an incredible rate. This raises concerns either in computability, interpretability, and sustainability. This is especially noticeable in earth science (geology, meteorology, oceanography, and astronomy), notably with climate studies. We highlight five main evaluation issues: efficiency, discrepancy, diversity, interpretability, availability. Among remedies, lossless and lossy compression techniques are becoming popular to better manage dataset volumes. Performance assessment—with comparative benchmarks—requires open datasets shared under FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable), provided in a MWE (Minimal Working Example) with ancillary data for reuse. We share <span>Lundi</span><sub>sim</sub>, an exemplary faulted geological mesh. It is inspired by the SPE10 comparative Challenge. It is not meant to be compared to the latter for reservoir simulation. It is instead tailored—with power-of-two dimensions and additional faults—to both more challenging fluid displacement and upscaling methods, and allowing versatile compression benchmarks. Enhanced by porosity/permeability datasets, this dataset proposes four distinct subsurface environments. They were primarily designed for flow simulation in porous media. Several consistent resolutions (with HexaShrink multiscale representations) are proposed for each model. We also provide a set of reservoir features for reproducing typical two-phase flow simulations on all <span>Lundi</span><sub>sim</sub> models in a reservoir engineering context. This dataset is chiefly meant for benchmarking and evaluating data size reduction (upscaling) or genuine composite mesh compression algorithms. It is also suitable for other advanced mesh processing workflows in geology and reservoir engineering, from visualisation to machine learning. <span>Lundi</span><sub>sim</sub> meshes are available at 10.5281/zenodo.14641958.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoscience Data Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gdj3.70030\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoscience Data Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gdj3.70030\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience Data Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gdj3.70030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lundisim: Model Meshes for Flow Simulation and Scientific Data Compression Benchmarks
The volume of scientific data produced for and by numerical simulation workflows is increasing at an incredible rate. This raises concerns either in computability, interpretability, and sustainability. This is especially noticeable in earth science (geology, meteorology, oceanography, and astronomy), notably with climate studies. We highlight five main evaluation issues: efficiency, discrepancy, diversity, interpretability, availability. Among remedies, lossless and lossy compression techniques are becoming popular to better manage dataset volumes. Performance assessment—with comparative benchmarks—requires open datasets shared under FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable), provided in a MWE (Minimal Working Example) with ancillary data for reuse. We share Lundisim, an exemplary faulted geological mesh. It is inspired by the SPE10 comparative Challenge. It is not meant to be compared to the latter for reservoir simulation. It is instead tailored—with power-of-two dimensions and additional faults—to both more challenging fluid displacement and upscaling methods, and allowing versatile compression benchmarks. Enhanced by porosity/permeability datasets, this dataset proposes four distinct subsurface environments. They were primarily designed for flow simulation in porous media. Several consistent resolutions (with HexaShrink multiscale representations) are proposed for each model. We also provide a set of reservoir features for reproducing typical two-phase flow simulations on all Lundisim models in a reservoir engineering context. This dataset is chiefly meant for benchmarking and evaluating data size reduction (upscaling) or genuine composite mesh compression algorithms. It is also suitable for other advanced mesh processing workflows in geology and reservoir engineering, from visualisation to machine learning. Lundisim meshes are available at 10.5281/zenodo.14641958.
Geoscience Data JournalGEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
35
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍:
Geoscience Data Journal provides an Open Access platform where scientific data can be formally published, in a way that includes scientific peer-review. Thus the dataset creator attains full credit for their efforts, while also improving the scientific record, providing version control for the community and allowing major datasets to be fully described, cited and discovered.
An online-only journal, GDJ publishes short data papers cross-linked to – and citing – datasets that have been deposited in approved data centres and awarded DOIs. The journal will also accept articles on data services, and articles which support and inform data publishing best practices.
Data is at the heart of science and scientific endeavour. The curation of data and the science associated with it is as important as ever in our understanding of the changing earth system and thereby enabling us to make future predictions. Geoscience Data Journal is working with recognised Data Centres across the globe to develop the future strategy for data publication, the recognition of the value of data and the communication and exploitation of data to the wider science and stakeholder communities.