{"title":"传教士的“正义”:威廉斯在中美布格万案谈判中的独特作用(1863-1865)","authors":"Siyang Shuai","doi":"10.1111/1467-9809.13159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Christianity in nineteenth-century China was closely intertwined with international politics, with missionaries deeply involved in diplomatic affairs. The Sino–US negotiation over the jurisdiction of Henry A. Burgevine (1836–65), an American suspect in China, was a unique case, in which S. Wells Williams (1812–84), a protestant missionary, played crucial roles. He not only influenced the negotiations by manipulating translations of diplomatic notes but also made the decision that led to the suspect's death and sparked controversies. This article, drawing from various archival sources, reconstructs Williams's crucial and yet neglected involvement in the case. By analysing his translation strategies and diplomatic actions, it reveals how Williams, a missionary-turned-diplomatic translator, pursued his vision of “justice,” and how his religious stance and moral values influenced his handling of foreign-related cases under the extraterritorial provision. Through Williams's case, the article sheds light on the interactions between religious values and political interests in early Sino–US diplomacy, thus deepening our understanding of early Sino–US relations as well as the history of Christianity in nineteenth-century China.</p>","PeriodicalId":44035,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS HISTORY","volume":"49 3","pages":"359-375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Missionary's “Justice”: The Unique Roles of S. Wells Williams in the Sino–American Negotiations on the Burgevine Case (1863–1865)\",\"authors\":\"Siyang Shuai\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-9809.13159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Christianity in nineteenth-century China was closely intertwined with international politics, with missionaries deeply involved in diplomatic affairs. The Sino–US negotiation over the jurisdiction of Henry A. Burgevine (1836–65), an American suspect in China, was a unique case, in which S. Wells Williams (1812–84), a protestant missionary, played crucial roles. He not only influenced the negotiations by manipulating translations of diplomatic notes but also made the decision that led to the suspect's death and sparked controversies. This article, drawing from various archival sources, reconstructs Williams's crucial and yet neglected involvement in the case. By analysing his translation strategies and diplomatic actions, it reveals how Williams, a missionary-turned-diplomatic translator, pursued his vision of “justice,” and how his religious stance and moral values influenced his handling of foreign-related cases under the extraterritorial provision. Through Williams's case, the article sheds light on the interactions between religious values and political interests in early Sino–US diplomacy, thus deepening our understanding of early Sino–US relations as well as the history of Christianity in nineteenth-century China.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"49 3\",\"pages\":\"359-375\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9809.13159\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9809.13159","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
19世纪中国的基督教与国际政治紧密交织,传教士深入参与外交事务。美国在华犯罪嫌疑人亨利·伯格万(Henry a . Burgevine, 1836-65)管辖权问题的中美谈判是一个独特的案例,其中新教传教士韦尔斯·威廉姆斯(S. Wells Williams, 1812-84)发挥了关键作用。他不仅通过操纵外交照会的翻译影响谈判,而且还做出了导致嫌疑人死亡并引发争议的决定。这篇文章,从各种档案来源,重建威廉姆斯的关键,但被忽视的参与案件。通过分析威廉斯的翻译策略和外交行动,揭示了传教士出身的外交翻译家威廉斯如何追求他的“正义”观,以及他的宗教立场和道德价值观如何影响他在治外法权条款下处理涉外案件。本文通过威廉姆斯的案例,揭示了早期中美外交中宗教价值观与政治利益之间的相互作用,从而加深了我们对早期中美关系以及19世纪中国基督教史的理解。
A Missionary's “Justice”: The Unique Roles of S. Wells Williams in the Sino–American Negotiations on the Burgevine Case (1863–1865)
Christianity in nineteenth-century China was closely intertwined with international politics, with missionaries deeply involved in diplomatic affairs. The Sino–US negotiation over the jurisdiction of Henry A. Burgevine (1836–65), an American suspect in China, was a unique case, in which S. Wells Williams (1812–84), a protestant missionary, played crucial roles. He not only influenced the negotiations by manipulating translations of diplomatic notes but also made the decision that led to the suspect's death and sparked controversies. This article, drawing from various archival sources, reconstructs Williams's crucial and yet neglected involvement in the case. By analysing his translation strategies and diplomatic actions, it reveals how Williams, a missionary-turned-diplomatic translator, pursued his vision of “justice,” and how his religious stance and moral values influenced his handling of foreign-related cases under the extraterritorial provision. Through Williams's case, the article sheds light on the interactions between religious values and political interests in early Sino–US diplomacy, thus deepening our understanding of early Sino–US relations as well as the history of Christianity in nineteenth-century China.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Religious History is a vital source of high quality information for all those interested in the place of religion in history. The Journal reviews current work on the history of religions and their relationship with all aspects of human experience. With high quality international contributors, the journal explores religion and its related subjects, along with debates on comparative method and theory in religious history.