驾驶员与行人的互动是否受到认知负荷和LED带的影响?一项驾驶模拟器研究调查了两个年龄组在不同环境光照条件下的表现

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
İbrahim Öztürk , Anthony Horrobin , Jorge Garcia de Pedro , Kumsal İpek Oker , Richard Rowe , Steve Fotios , Natasha Merat
{"title":"驾驶员与行人的互动是否受到认知负荷和LED带的影响?一项驾驶模拟器研究调查了两个年龄组在不同环境光照条件下的表现","authors":"İbrahim Öztürk ,&nbsp;Anthony Horrobin ,&nbsp;Jorge Garcia de Pedro ,&nbsp;Kumsal İpek Oker ,&nbsp;Richard Rowe ,&nbsp;Steve Fotios ,&nbsp;Natasha Merat","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.103368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pedestrians, being vulnerable road users, are disproportionately affected by road traffic crashes. Many factors influence driver-pedestrian interactions and hence pedestrian safety. Within these interactions, drivers play a critical role as operators of the vehicle. Therefore, it is crucial to understand what factors influence drivers’ perceptions and actions when interacting with pedestrians in different situations. A driving simulator study was designed to investigate the effects of age (younger and older drivers), cognitive load (no task, 2-back task), the presence (or absence) of a zebra crossing, ambient lighting (daylight, after dark), pedestrian position (standing, walking), and whether the pedestrian was wearing a light-emitting diode (LED) band on drivers’ yielding behaviours during interactions with pedestrians. Two groups of drivers (23 younger drivers: <em>Mdn<sub>age</sub></em> = 22 and 19 older drivers: <em>Mdn<sub>age</sub></em> = 64) completed two experimental drives during daylight and after dark. Objective measures (probability of yielding and average deceleration) were used to interpret yielding behaviour and the factors influencing it. The results showed that drivers were more likely to yield when a zebra crossing was present. For conditions with zebra crossings, drivers were more likely to give way to pedestrians waiting by the crossing than when pedestrians were approaching the crossing. Drivers of both age groups behaved in a similar way with standing pedestrians. But with walking pedestrians, younger drivers were more likely to yield and did so softer. In trials where the pedestrians wore LED bands to enhance their conspicuity, the average deceleration was reduced, resulting in smoother braking. These results inform the development of policy and interventions (e.g., effectiveness of zebra crossings, effects of LED bands) to improve the safety of vulnerable road users.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 103368"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is drivers’ interaction with pedestrians affected by cognitive load and LED bands? A driving simulator study investigating performance across two age groups during different ambient lighting conditions\",\"authors\":\"İbrahim Öztürk ,&nbsp;Anthony Horrobin ,&nbsp;Jorge Garcia de Pedro ,&nbsp;Kumsal İpek Oker ,&nbsp;Richard Rowe ,&nbsp;Steve Fotios ,&nbsp;Natasha Merat\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trf.2025.103368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Pedestrians, being vulnerable road users, are disproportionately affected by road traffic crashes. Many factors influence driver-pedestrian interactions and hence pedestrian safety. Within these interactions, drivers play a critical role as operators of the vehicle. Therefore, it is crucial to understand what factors influence drivers’ perceptions and actions when interacting with pedestrians in different situations. A driving simulator study was designed to investigate the effects of age (younger and older drivers), cognitive load (no task, 2-back task), the presence (or absence) of a zebra crossing, ambient lighting (daylight, after dark), pedestrian position (standing, walking), and whether the pedestrian was wearing a light-emitting diode (LED) band on drivers’ yielding behaviours during interactions with pedestrians. Two groups of drivers (23 younger drivers: <em>Mdn<sub>age</sub></em> = 22 and 19 older drivers: <em>Mdn<sub>age</sub></em> = 64) completed two experimental drives during daylight and after dark. Objective measures (probability of yielding and average deceleration) were used to interpret yielding behaviour and the factors influencing it. The results showed that drivers were more likely to yield when a zebra crossing was present. For conditions with zebra crossings, drivers were more likely to give way to pedestrians waiting by the crossing than when pedestrians were approaching the crossing. Drivers of both age groups behaved in a similar way with standing pedestrians. But with walking pedestrians, younger drivers were more likely to yield and did so softer. In trials where the pedestrians wore LED bands to enhance their conspicuity, the average deceleration was reduced, resulting in smoother braking. These results inform the development of policy and interventions (e.g., effectiveness of zebra crossings, effects of LED bands) to improve the safety of vulnerable road users.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"115 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103368\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825003237\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825003237","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

行人是脆弱的道路使用者,受到道路交通碰撞的影响尤为严重。许多因素影响驾驶人与行人的相互作用,从而影响行人的安全。在这些互动中,驾驶员作为车辆的操作员起着至关重要的作用。因此,了解驾驶员在不同情况下与行人互动时的感知和行为的影响因素至关重要。设计了一项驾驶模拟器研究,旨在调查年龄(年轻和年长的驾驶员)、认知负荷(无任务、双背任务)、斑马线的存在(或不存在)、环境照明(白天、天黑后)、行人位置(站立、行走)以及行人是否佩戴发光二极管(LED)带对驾驶员在与行人互动时让步行为的影响。两组司机(23名年轻司机:Mdnage = 22)和19名年长司机:Mdnage = 64)在白天和天黑后完成了两次实验驾驶。使用客观测量(屈服概率和平均减速)来解释屈服行为及其影响因素。结果显示,当斑马线出现时,司机更有可能让路。在有斑马线的情况下,与行人接近斑马线时相比,司机更有可能给在斑马线旁等待的行人让路。这两个年龄段的司机对待站立的行人的行为方式相似。但面对步行的行人,年轻司机更有可能让步,而且更温柔。在试验中,行人佩戴LED手环以增强他们的可视性,平均减速减少,从而使制动更平稳。这些结果为制定政策和干预措施(例如,斑马线的有效性,LED波段的影响)提供了信息,以提高弱势道路使用者的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is drivers’ interaction with pedestrians affected by cognitive load and LED bands? A driving simulator study investigating performance across two age groups during different ambient lighting conditions
Pedestrians, being vulnerable road users, are disproportionately affected by road traffic crashes. Many factors influence driver-pedestrian interactions and hence pedestrian safety. Within these interactions, drivers play a critical role as operators of the vehicle. Therefore, it is crucial to understand what factors influence drivers’ perceptions and actions when interacting with pedestrians in different situations. A driving simulator study was designed to investigate the effects of age (younger and older drivers), cognitive load (no task, 2-back task), the presence (or absence) of a zebra crossing, ambient lighting (daylight, after dark), pedestrian position (standing, walking), and whether the pedestrian was wearing a light-emitting diode (LED) band on drivers’ yielding behaviours during interactions with pedestrians. Two groups of drivers (23 younger drivers: Mdnage = 22 and 19 older drivers: Mdnage = 64) completed two experimental drives during daylight and after dark. Objective measures (probability of yielding and average deceleration) were used to interpret yielding behaviour and the factors influencing it. The results showed that drivers were more likely to yield when a zebra crossing was present. For conditions with zebra crossings, drivers were more likely to give way to pedestrians waiting by the crossing than when pedestrians were approaching the crossing. Drivers of both age groups behaved in a similar way with standing pedestrians. But with walking pedestrians, younger drivers were more likely to yield and did so softer. In trials where the pedestrians wore LED bands to enhance their conspicuity, the average deceleration was reduced, resulting in smoother braking. These results inform the development of policy and interventions (e.g., effectiveness of zebra crossings, effects of LED bands) to improve the safety of vulnerable road users.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信