{"title":"英语媒介教学中译语教学法研究的方法论特征评价","authors":"Junwei Sam Liao , Fan Fang , Lawrence Jun Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research on translanguaging has gained momentum in recent years. However, there is little literature systematically documenting the research methodologies of translangaging pedagogy employed for carrying out this line of research in English Medium Instruction (EMI) contexts. Thus, we made an attempt to examine studies on translanguaging pedagogy in EMI from 2014 to 2024. Utilising a qualitative meta-synthesis approach, we analysed 10 empirical studies through systematic searches in the Web of Science Core Collection and the Scopus database. Findings revealed a predominance of qualitative methodologies, such as case studies and thematic analysis, with data collected via semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, surveys, and student artifacts. These studies largely concentrated on Asian contexts and at the tertiary level, exploring teachers’ and students’ translanguaging perceptions and strategies in EMI classrooms. Despite the depth provided by qualitative approaches, the review identified a lack of quantitative and mixed-methods research in this field. The absence of research frameworks and contextual diversity highlights gaps in the field. The paper, therefore, concludes with recommendations for more research using multiple methodologies to explore translanguaging pedagogies in different EMI contexts and specific EMI subjects, as well as potential research objectives and research fields.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101075,"journal":{"name":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating methodological features of research on translanguaging pedagogy in English Medium Instruction (EMI)\",\"authors\":\"Junwei Sam Liao , Fan Fang , Lawrence Jun Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Research on translanguaging has gained momentum in recent years. However, there is little literature systematically documenting the research methodologies of translangaging pedagogy employed for carrying out this line of research in English Medium Instruction (EMI) contexts. Thus, we made an attempt to examine studies on translanguaging pedagogy in EMI from 2014 to 2024. Utilising a qualitative meta-synthesis approach, we analysed 10 empirical studies through systematic searches in the Web of Science Core Collection and the Scopus database. Findings revealed a predominance of qualitative methodologies, such as case studies and thematic analysis, with data collected via semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, surveys, and student artifacts. These studies largely concentrated on Asian contexts and at the tertiary level, exploring teachers’ and students’ translanguaging perceptions and strategies in EMI classrooms. Despite the depth provided by qualitative approaches, the review identified a lack of quantitative and mixed-methods research in this field. The absence of research frameworks and contextual diversity highlights gaps in the field. The paper, therefore, concludes with recommendations for more research using multiple methodologies to explore translanguaging pedagogies in different EMI contexts and specific EMI subjects, as well as potential research objectives and research fields.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766125000849\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766125000849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
近年来,对译语的研究发展迅速。然而,很少有文献系统地记录翻译教学法的研究方法,用于在英语媒介教学(EMI)背景下开展这一研究。因此,我们尝试对2014年至2024年EMI的译语教学法研究进行考察。利用定性综合方法,我们通过系统检索Web of Science核心合集和Scopus数据库,分析了10项实证研究。调查结果显示,定性方法占主导地位,如案例研究和专题分析,通过半结构化访谈、课堂观察、调查和学生人工制品收集数据。这些研究主要集中在亚洲背景和高等教育水平,探索EMI课堂中教师和学生的译语感知和策略。尽管定性方法提供了深度,但审查发现该领域缺乏定量和混合方法研究。缺乏研究框架和背景多样性突出了该领域的差距。因此,本文最后建议使用多种方法进行更多的研究,以探索不同EMI背景和特定EMI主题下的译语教学法,以及潜在的研究目标和研究领域。
Evaluating methodological features of research on translanguaging pedagogy in English Medium Instruction (EMI)
Research on translanguaging has gained momentum in recent years. However, there is little literature systematically documenting the research methodologies of translangaging pedagogy employed for carrying out this line of research in English Medium Instruction (EMI) contexts. Thus, we made an attempt to examine studies on translanguaging pedagogy in EMI from 2014 to 2024. Utilising a qualitative meta-synthesis approach, we analysed 10 empirical studies through systematic searches in the Web of Science Core Collection and the Scopus database. Findings revealed a predominance of qualitative methodologies, such as case studies and thematic analysis, with data collected via semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, surveys, and student artifacts. These studies largely concentrated on Asian contexts and at the tertiary level, exploring teachers’ and students’ translanguaging perceptions and strategies in EMI classrooms. Despite the depth provided by qualitative approaches, the review identified a lack of quantitative and mixed-methods research in this field. The absence of research frameworks and contextual diversity highlights gaps in the field. The paper, therefore, concludes with recommendations for more research using multiple methodologies to explore translanguaging pedagogies in different EMI contexts and specific EMI subjects, as well as potential research objectives and research fields.