Ioni Lewis, David Rodwell, Nyree Gordon, Melinda McDonald
{"title":"研究鼓励积极、亲社会驾驶行为的道路安全广告的影响","authors":"Ioni Lewis, David Rodwell, Nyree Gordon, Melinda McDonald","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.103366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prosocial driving behaviours are performed to benefit other road users and without legal obligation. This online survey study, guided by the Step approach to Message Design and Testing (SatMDT), examined advertisements in terms of drivers’ intentions and willingness to drive in a prosocial way. ‘Drive in a prosocial way’ was operationalised in both general and specific terms. N = 213 participants (48.8 % female; <em>M</em> = 54.0 years, <em>SD</em> = 15.1 years) were randomly allocated into four intervention groups (i.e., Advertisement 1, 2, 3, or 4) or a control group. Overall, in the intervention groups, while relatively high mean scores were found, one-way ANOVAs revealed there were no statistically significant differences between the advertisements. Reverse third person effects were found for all the advertisements suggesting participants perceived they would be influenced by them more than others. Regarding between groups comparisons, intentions and willingness scores increased (i.e., became more positive towards prosocial driving) after having viewed an advertisement; however, paired samples <em>t</em> tests indicated these differences were only statistically significant for general and specific intentions after viewing Advertisement 2, and for specific intentions after viewing Advertisement 4. To understand how the advertisements were influencing individuals’ intentions, regressions were conducted which found 72 % − 90 % of variance was explained by the variables of attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioural control [PBC], moral norms, and anticipated regret. PBC and moral norms were significant predictors for three of the advertisements. Overall, this study supports the need for further research into messaging promoting prosocial driving behaviour.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 103366"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the effects of road safety advertising that encourages positive, prosocial driving behaviours\",\"authors\":\"Ioni Lewis, David Rodwell, Nyree Gordon, Melinda McDonald\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trf.2025.103366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Prosocial driving behaviours are performed to benefit other road users and without legal obligation. This online survey study, guided by the Step approach to Message Design and Testing (SatMDT), examined advertisements in terms of drivers’ intentions and willingness to drive in a prosocial way. ‘Drive in a prosocial way’ was operationalised in both general and specific terms. N = 213 participants (48.8 % female; <em>M</em> = 54.0 years, <em>SD</em> = 15.1 years) were randomly allocated into four intervention groups (i.e., Advertisement 1, 2, 3, or 4) or a control group. Overall, in the intervention groups, while relatively high mean scores were found, one-way ANOVAs revealed there were no statistically significant differences between the advertisements. Reverse third person effects were found for all the advertisements suggesting participants perceived they would be influenced by them more than others. Regarding between groups comparisons, intentions and willingness scores increased (i.e., became more positive towards prosocial driving) after having viewed an advertisement; however, paired samples <em>t</em> tests indicated these differences were only statistically significant for general and specific intentions after viewing Advertisement 2, and for specific intentions after viewing Advertisement 4. To understand how the advertisements were influencing individuals’ intentions, regressions were conducted which found 72 % − 90 % of variance was explained by the variables of attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioural control [PBC], moral norms, and anticipated regret. PBC and moral norms were significant predictors for three of the advertisements. Overall, this study supports the need for further research into messaging promoting prosocial driving behaviour.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"115 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825003213\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825003213","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
Examining the effects of road safety advertising that encourages positive, prosocial driving behaviours
Prosocial driving behaviours are performed to benefit other road users and without legal obligation. This online survey study, guided by the Step approach to Message Design and Testing (SatMDT), examined advertisements in terms of drivers’ intentions and willingness to drive in a prosocial way. ‘Drive in a prosocial way’ was operationalised in both general and specific terms. N = 213 participants (48.8 % female; M = 54.0 years, SD = 15.1 years) were randomly allocated into four intervention groups (i.e., Advertisement 1, 2, 3, or 4) or a control group. Overall, in the intervention groups, while relatively high mean scores were found, one-way ANOVAs revealed there were no statistically significant differences between the advertisements. Reverse third person effects were found for all the advertisements suggesting participants perceived they would be influenced by them more than others. Regarding between groups comparisons, intentions and willingness scores increased (i.e., became more positive towards prosocial driving) after having viewed an advertisement; however, paired samples t tests indicated these differences were only statistically significant for general and specific intentions after viewing Advertisement 2, and for specific intentions after viewing Advertisement 4. To understand how the advertisements were influencing individuals’ intentions, regressions were conducted which found 72 % − 90 % of variance was explained by the variables of attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioural control [PBC], moral norms, and anticipated regret. PBC and moral norms were significant predictors for three of the advertisements. Overall, this study supports the need for further research into messaging promoting prosocial driving behaviour.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.