Zheng Hang , Zhu Qing-feng , Song Ye-zhi , Li Xu-zhi , Xu Xiao-hui , Qiu Jin-sheng , Zhao Jun-han
{"title":"小行星撞击概率分析方法研究","authors":"Zheng Hang , Zhu Qing-feng , Song Ye-zhi , Li Xu-zhi , Xu Xiao-hui , Qiu Jin-sheng , Zhao Jun-han","doi":"10.1016/j.chinastron.2025.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In view of the current situation of inconsistent conclusions among existing asteroid impact monitoring systems, the linear approximation method used in the change line impact monitoring system was studied, and the conclusion is achieved that the deviation of the orbit distribution relative to the theoretical orbit distribution obtained by this method gradually became significant as the orbit propagation time increased. The impact probability of 6 asteroid instances was calculated using the Monte Carlo method. Compared with the results of the existing Monte Carlo impact monitoring system, the maximum difference is 2.1 times the standard deviation. The impact samples of asteroid 2020 VV in October 2056 are analyzed in detail, and the distribution of impact samples with time and space is depicted, and the conclusions are consistent with those of existing impact monitoring systems. As for the comparison between the different impact monitoring systems, it is concluded that the Monte Carlo impact monitoring system and the change line impact monitoring system currently have their own advantages and disadvantages: the former does not introduce the error caused by the linear approximation method, but the computational cost is high. The linear approximation method used in the latter will bring errors, but it can find some virtual impact sources with low impact probability that may be missed by the former, and the computational cost is relatively low.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35730,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics","volume":"49 3","pages":"Pages 565-578"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on the Analysis Method of Asteroid Impact Probability\",\"authors\":\"Zheng Hang , Zhu Qing-feng , Song Ye-zhi , Li Xu-zhi , Xu Xiao-hui , Qiu Jin-sheng , Zhao Jun-han\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chinastron.2025.09.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In view of the current situation of inconsistent conclusions among existing asteroid impact monitoring systems, the linear approximation method used in the change line impact monitoring system was studied, and the conclusion is achieved that the deviation of the orbit distribution relative to the theoretical orbit distribution obtained by this method gradually became significant as the orbit propagation time increased. The impact probability of 6 asteroid instances was calculated using the Monte Carlo method. Compared with the results of the existing Monte Carlo impact monitoring system, the maximum difference is 2.1 times the standard deviation. The impact samples of asteroid 2020 VV in October 2056 are analyzed in detail, and the distribution of impact samples with time and space is depicted, and the conclusions are consistent with those of existing impact monitoring systems. As for the comparison between the different impact monitoring systems, it is concluded that the Monte Carlo impact monitoring system and the change line impact monitoring system currently have their own advantages and disadvantages: the former does not introduce the error caused by the linear approximation method, but the computational cost is high. The linear approximation method used in the latter will bring errors, but it can find some virtual impact sources with low impact probability that may be missed by the former, and the computational cost is relatively low.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics\",\"volume\":\"49 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 565-578\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275106225000827\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Physics and Astronomy\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275106225000827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
Research on the Analysis Method of Asteroid Impact Probability
In view of the current situation of inconsistent conclusions among existing asteroid impact monitoring systems, the linear approximation method used in the change line impact monitoring system was studied, and the conclusion is achieved that the deviation of the orbit distribution relative to the theoretical orbit distribution obtained by this method gradually became significant as the orbit propagation time increased. The impact probability of 6 asteroid instances was calculated using the Monte Carlo method. Compared with the results of the existing Monte Carlo impact monitoring system, the maximum difference is 2.1 times the standard deviation. The impact samples of asteroid 2020 VV in October 2056 are analyzed in detail, and the distribution of impact samples with time and space is depicted, and the conclusions are consistent with those of existing impact monitoring systems. As for the comparison between the different impact monitoring systems, it is concluded that the Monte Carlo impact monitoring system and the change line impact monitoring system currently have their own advantages and disadvantages: the former does not introduce the error caused by the linear approximation method, but the computational cost is high. The linear approximation method used in the latter will bring errors, but it can find some virtual impact sources with low impact probability that may be missed by the former, and the computational cost is relatively low.
期刊介绍:
The vigorous growth of astronomical and astrophysical science in China led to an increase in papers on astrophysics which Acta Astronomica Sinica could no longer absorb. Translations of papers from two new journals the Chinese Journal of Space Science and Acta Astrophysica Sinica are added to the translation of Acta Astronomica Sinica to form the new journal Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics. Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics brings English translations of notable articles to astronomers and astrophysicists outside China.