Galal Elsamak , Mohamed Ghalla , Mohamed H. El-Naqeeb , Ehab A. Mlybari , Rabeea W. Bazuhair , Mohamed Emara
{"title":"轴压下无配筋砌体柱优化混合加固技术的试验与数值评价","authors":"Galal Elsamak , Mohamed Ghalla , Mohamed H. El-Naqeeb , Ehab A. Mlybari , Rabeea W. Bazuhair , Mohamed Emara","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a comprehensive experimental and numerical investigation into the axial performance of unreinforced masonry (URM) columns strengthened with various hybrid retrofitting techniques. Thirteen full-scale brick masonry columns were tested under monotonic axial compression to evaluate the effects of strain-hardening cementitious composites (SHCC) jacketing, near-surface mounted (NSM) steel bars, and embedded steel/glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) mesh. The experimental program examined load–displacement behavior, failure modes, ultimate capacity, ductility, and energy absorption. Results demonstrated that hybrid strengthening combining NSM bars and mesh-reinforced SHCC jacketing achieved up to 70 % increase in load capacity and double the energy absorption compared to the unstrengthened reference. A validated finite element model, developed in ABAQUS using cohesive damage and embedded interaction approaches, accurately replicated the experimental response, with an average experimental-to-numerical load ratio of 0.95 and displacement ratio of 0.90. Parametric studies showed that increasing longitudinal reinforcement ratio in hybrid systems enhanced axial capacity by up to 39 %, while increasing transverse mesh ratio improved strength by 25 % before plateauing. These findings highlight the synergistic role of axial and transverse reinforcement in improving strength and ductility and offer a reliable modeling framework for optimizing retrofit designs of URM columns in seismic and structural upgrade applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 110222"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental and numerical assessment of optimized hybrid strengthening techniques for unreinforced masonry columns under axial compression\",\"authors\":\"Galal Elsamak , Mohamed Ghalla , Mohamed H. El-Naqeeb , Ehab A. Mlybari , Rabeea W. Bazuhair , Mohamed Emara\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study presents a comprehensive experimental and numerical investigation into the axial performance of unreinforced masonry (URM) columns strengthened with various hybrid retrofitting techniques. Thirteen full-scale brick masonry columns were tested under monotonic axial compression to evaluate the effects of strain-hardening cementitious composites (SHCC) jacketing, near-surface mounted (NSM) steel bars, and embedded steel/glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) mesh. The experimental program examined load–displacement behavior, failure modes, ultimate capacity, ductility, and energy absorption. Results demonstrated that hybrid strengthening combining NSM bars and mesh-reinforced SHCC jacketing achieved up to 70 % increase in load capacity and double the energy absorption compared to the unstrengthened reference. A validated finite element model, developed in ABAQUS using cohesive damage and embedded interaction approaches, accurately replicated the experimental response, with an average experimental-to-numerical load ratio of 0.95 and displacement ratio of 0.90. Parametric studies showed that increasing longitudinal reinforcement ratio in hybrid systems enhanced axial capacity by up to 39 %, while increasing transverse mesh ratio improved strength by 25 % before plateauing. These findings highlight the synergistic role of axial and transverse reinforcement in improving strength and ductility and offer a reliable modeling framework for optimizing retrofit designs of URM columns in seismic and structural upgrade applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structures\",\"volume\":\"81 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425020375\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425020375","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Experimental and numerical assessment of optimized hybrid strengthening techniques for unreinforced masonry columns under axial compression
This study presents a comprehensive experimental and numerical investigation into the axial performance of unreinforced masonry (URM) columns strengthened with various hybrid retrofitting techniques. Thirteen full-scale brick masonry columns were tested under monotonic axial compression to evaluate the effects of strain-hardening cementitious composites (SHCC) jacketing, near-surface mounted (NSM) steel bars, and embedded steel/glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) mesh. The experimental program examined load–displacement behavior, failure modes, ultimate capacity, ductility, and energy absorption. Results demonstrated that hybrid strengthening combining NSM bars and mesh-reinforced SHCC jacketing achieved up to 70 % increase in load capacity and double the energy absorption compared to the unstrengthened reference. A validated finite element model, developed in ABAQUS using cohesive damage and embedded interaction approaches, accurately replicated the experimental response, with an average experimental-to-numerical load ratio of 0.95 and displacement ratio of 0.90. Parametric studies showed that increasing longitudinal reinforcement ratio in hybrid systems enhanced axial capacity by up to 39 %, while increasing transverse mesh ratio improved strength by 25 % before plateauing. These findings highlight the synergistic role of axial and transverse reinforcement in improving strength and ductility and offer a reliable modeling framework for optimizing retrofit designs of URM columns in seismic and structural upgrade applications.
期刊介绍:
Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.