轴压下无配筋砌体柱优化混合加固技术的试验与数值评价

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Galal Elsamak , Mohamed Ghalla , Mohamed H. El-Naqeeb , Ehab A. Mlybari , Rabeea W. Bazuhair , Mohamed Emara
{"title":"轴压下无配筋砌体柱优化混合加固技术的试验与数值评价","authors":"Galal Elsamak ,&nbsp;Mohamed Ghalla ,&nbsp;Mohamed H. El-Naqeeb ,&nbsp;Ehab A. Mlybari ,&nbsp;Rabeea W. Bazuhair ,&nbsp;Mohamed Emara","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a comprehensive experimental and numerical investigation into the axial performance of unreinforced masonry (URM) columns strengthened with various hybrid retrofitting techniques. Thirteen full-scale brick masonry columns were tested under monotonic axial compression to evaluate the effects of strain-hardening cementitious composites (SHCC) jacketing, near-surface mounted (NSM) steel bars, and embedded steel/glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) mesh. The experimental program examined load–displacement behavior, failure modes, ultimate capacity, ductility, and energy absorption. Results demonstrated that hybrid strengthening combining NSM bars and mesh-reinforced SHCC jacketing achieved up to 70 % increase in load capacity and double the energy absorption compared to the unstrengthened reference. A validated finite element model, developed in ABAQUS using cohesive damage and embedded interaction approaches, accurately replicated the experimental response, with an average experimental-to-numerical load ratio of 0.95 and displacement ratio of 0.90. Parametric studies showed that increasing longitudinal reinforcement ratio in hybrid systems enhanced axial capacity by up to 39 %, while increasing transverse mesh ratio improved strength by 25 % before plateauing. These findings highlight the synergistic role of axial and transverse reinforcement in improving strength and ductility and offer a reliable modeling framework for optimizing retrofit designs of URM columns in seismic and structural upgrade applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 110222"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental and numerical assessment of optimized hybrid strengthening techniques for unreinforced masonry columns under axial compression\",\"authors\":\"Galal Elsamak ,&nbsp;Mohamed Ghalla ,&nbsp;Mohamed H. El-Naqeeb ,&nbsp;Ehab A. Mlybari ,&nbsp;Rabeea W. Bazuhair ,&nbsp;Mohamed Emara\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study presents a comprehensive experimental and numerical investigation into the axial performance of unreinforced masonry (URM) columns strengthened with various hybrid retrofitting techniques. Thirteen full-scale brick masonry columns were tested under monotonic axial compression to evaluate the effects of strain-hardening cementitious composites (SHCC) jacketing, near-surface mounted (NSM) steel bars, and embedded steel/glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) mesh. The experimental program examined load–displacement behavior, failure modes, ultimate capacity, ductility, and energy absorption. Results demonstrated that hybrid strengthening combining NSM bars and mesh-reinforced SHCC jacketing achieved up to 70 % increase in load capacity and double the energy absorption compared to the unstrengthened reference. A validated finite element model, developed in ABAQUS using cohesive damage and embedded interaction approaches, accurately replicated the experimental response, with an average experimental-to-numerical load ratio of 0.95 and displacement ratio of 0.90. Parametric studies showed that increasing longitudinal reinforcement ratio in hybrid systems enhanced axial capacity by up to 39 %, while increasing transverse mesh ratio improved strength by 25 % before plateauing. These findings highlight the synergistic role of axial and transverse reinforcement in improving strength and ductility and offer a reliable modeling framework for optimizing retrofit designs of URM columns in seismic and structural upgrade applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structures\",\"volume\":\"81 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425020375\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425020375","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对采用各种混合加固技术加固的无筋砌体(URM)柱的轴向性能进行了全面的试验和数值研究。为了评估应变硬化胶凝复合材料(SHCC)护套、近表面安装(NSM)钢筋和预埋钢/玻璃纤维增强聚合物(GFRP)网的效果,对13根全尺寸砖砌体柱进行了单调轴压试验。试验程序检查了荷载-位移行为、破坏模式、极限承载力、延性和能量吸收。结果表明,与未加强对照相比,NSM杆和网格增强SHCC护套的混合强化使其承载能力提高了70% %,能量吸收提高了一倍。在ABAQUS中使用内聚损伤和嵌入相互作用方法建立了一个经过验证的有限元模型,该模型准确地复制了实验响应,平均实验与数值载荷比为0.95,位移比为0.90。参数研究表明,增加混合动力系统的纵向配筋率可使轴向承载力提高39 %,而增加横向配筋率可使强度提高25 %。这些发现突出了轴向和横向加固在提高强度和延性方面的协同作用,并为优化URM柱在抗震和结构升级应用中的改造设计提供了可靠的建模框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental and numerical assessment of optimized hybrid strengthening techniques for unreinforced masonry columns under axial compression
This study presents a comprehensive experimental and numerical investigation into the axial performance of unreinforced masonry (URM) columns strengthened with various hybrid retrofitting techniques. Thirteen full-scale brick masonry columns were tested under monotonic axial compression to evaluate the effects of strain-hardening cementitious composites (SHCC) jacketing, near-surface mounted (NSM) steel bars, and embedded steel/glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) mesh. The experimental program examined load–displacement behavior, failure modes, ultimate capacity, ductility, and energy absorption. Results demonstrated that hybrid strengthening combining NSM bars and mesh-reinforced SHCC jacketing achieved up to 70 % increase in load capacity and double the energy absorption compared to the unstrengthened reference. A validated finite element model, developed in ABAQUS using cohesive damage and embedded interaction approaches, accurately replicated the experimental response, with an average experimental-to-numerical load ratio of 0.95 and displacement ratio of 0.90. Parametric studies showed that increasing longitudinal reinforcement ratio in hybrid systems enhanced axial capacity by up to 39 %, while increasing transverse mesh ratio improved strength by 25 % before plateauing. These findings highlight the synergistic role of axial and transverse reinforcement in improving strength and ductility and offer a reliable modeling framework for optimizing retrofit designs of URM columns in seismic and structural upgrade applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信