牛罗列定引起的严重过敏反应

IF 3.4 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Lisa Christina Horvath , Gottfried Heinz , Christine Bangert , Anselm Jorda , Moritz Staudacher , Georg Gelbenegger , Bernd Jilma
{"title":"牛罗列定引起的严重过敏反应","authors":"Lisa Christina Horvath ,&nbsp;Gottfried Heinz ,&nbsp;Christine Bangert ,&nbsp;Anselm Jorda ,&nbsp;Moritz Staudacher ,&nbsp;Georg Gelbenegger ,&nbsp;Bernd Jilma","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2025.101086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Taurolidine-based catheter lock solutions are widely used for central venous catheters. Although minor infusion-related symptoms and allergic reactions have been documented, no systemic effects or severe cases of anaphylaxis have been observed. Here, we detail a case of taurolidine-induced life-threatening anaphylaxis. We report the case of a 59-year-old man who had a severe anaphylactic reaction to taurolidine following accidental intravenous infusion, which required treatment in the intensive care unit. Anaphylactic shock, which was resistant to conventional treatment with epinephrine, required additional management with norepinephrine and vasopressin. After the resolution of the anaphylactic episode, the patient was discharged from the intensive care unit. An outpatient allergy work-up using a skin prick test was performed, which confirmed a suspected allergy to taurolidine. In conclusion, taurolidine induced a severe, prolonged anaphylactic shock that did not respond to conventional treatment with intravenous and inhaled epinephrine, antihistamines, glucocorticoids, or continuous norepinephrine infusion. New treatment strategies for refractory anaphylactic shock are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":"7 10","pages":"Article 101086"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taurolidine-induced Severe Anaphylaxis\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Christina Horvath ,&nbsp;Gottfried Heinz ,&nbsp;Christine Bangert ,&nbsp;Anselm Jorda ,&nbsp;Moritz Staudacher ,&nbsp;Georg Gelbenegger ,&nbsp;Bernd Jilma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xkme.2025.101086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Taurolidine-based catheter lock solutions are widely used for central venous catheters. Although minor infusion-related symptoms and allergic reactions have been documented, no systemic effects or severe cases of anaphylaxis have been observed. Here, we detail a case of taurolidine-induced life-threatening anaphylaxis. We report the case of a 59-year-old man who had a severe anaphylactic reaction to taurolidine following accidental intravenous infusion, which required treatment in the intensive care unit. Anaphylactic shock, which was resistant to conventional treatment with epinephrine, required additional management with norepinephrine and vasopressin. After the resolution of the anaphylactic episode, the patient was discharged from the intensive care unit. An outpatient allergy work-up using a skin prick test was performed, which confirmed a suspected allergy to taurolidine. In conclusion, taurolidine induced a severe, prolonged anaphylactic shock that did not respond to conventional treatment with intravenous and inhaled epinephrine, antihistamines, glucocorticoids, or continuous norepinephrine infusion. New treatment strategies for refractory anaphylactic shock are needed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney Medicine\",\"volume\":\"7 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 101086\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059525001220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059525001220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以牛磺酸烷为基础的导管锁定溶液广泛用于中心静脉导管。虽然有轻微的输液相关症状和过敏反应的记录,但没有观察到全身反应或严重的过敏反应病例。在这里,我们详细的牛罗列定诱发危及生命的过敏反应的情况。我们报告的情况下,59岁的男子谁有一个严重的过敏反应,牛罗列丁意外静脉输注后,需要在重症监护病房治疗。过敏性休克对常规的肾上腺素治疗有抵抗性,需要额外的去甲肾上腺素和加压素治疗。过敏发作消退后,患者出院。使用皮肤点刺试验进行门诊过敏检查,证实了对牛罗列丁的疑似过敏。总之,牛罗列定诱导了严重的、长期的过敏性休克,对静脉注射和吸入肾上腺素、抗组胺药、糖皮质激素或持续输注去甲肾上腺素的常规治疗没有反应。需要新的治疗策略来治疗难治性过敏性休克。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Taurolidine-induced Severe Anaphylaxis
Taurolidine-based catheter lock solutions are widely used for central venous catheters. Although minor infusion-related symptoms and allergic reactions have been documented, no systemic effects or severe cases of anaphylaxis have been observed. Here, we detail a case of taurolidine-induced life-threatening anaphylaxis. We report the case of a 59-year-old man who had a severe anaphylactic reaction to taurolidine following accidental intravenous infusion, which required treatment in the intensive care unit. Anaphylactic shock, which was resistant to conventional treatment with epinephrine, required additional management with norepinephrine and vasopressin. After the resolution of the anaphylactic episode, the patient was discharged from the intensive care unit. An outpatient allergy work-up using a skin prick test was performed, which confirmed a suspected allergy to taurolidine. In conclusion, taurolidine induced a severe, prolonged anaphylactic shock that did not respond to conventional treatment with intravenous and inhaled epinephrine, antihistamines, glucocorticoids, or continuous norepinephrine infusion. New treatment strategies for refractory anaphylactic shock are needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney Medicine
Kidney Medicine Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信