促进土著人民在国际环境条约中的主权:呼吁在国际贸易和投资法中加入例外条款

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Young Lo Ko, Tae Jung Park
{"title":"促进土著人民在国际环境条约中的主权:呼吁在国际贸易和投资法中加入例外条款","authors":"Young Lo Ko,&nbsp;Tae Jung Park","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Indigenous peoples face persistent threats from extractive industries and state-led development, often without sufficient legal safeguards. International environmental treaties, while referencing Indigenous rights, typically use non-binding language that enables weak or selective implementation. This paper aims to identify how treaty design can more effectively protect existing domestic Indigenous protections. Drawing on trade and investment law examples—such as New Zealand’s Treaty of Waitangi clauses and Colombia’s reservation lists—it argues for systematically incorporating explicit carve-out mechanisms into environmental and human rights treaties. Naming Indigenous groups and domestic laws within treaty texts can strengthen legal certainty and shield protections from erosion. The paper concludes with recommendations for negotiators, including legal audits, inter-ministerial coordination, and capacity-building to help states, particularly in the Global South, design carve-outs that reinforce Indigenous sovereignty.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 127095"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing indigenous peoples’ sovereignty in international environmental treaties: a call for exception clauses in international trade and investment law\",\"authors\":\"Young Lo Ko,&nbsp;Tae Jung Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Indigenous peoples face persistent threats from extractive industries and state-led development, often without sufficient legal safeguards. International environmental treaties, while referencing Indigenous rights, typically use non-binding language that enables weak or selective implementation. This paper aims to identify how treaty design can more effectively protect existing domestic Indigenous protections. Drawing on trade and investment law examples—such as New Zealand’s Treaty of Waitangi clauses and Colombia’s reservation lists—it argues for systematically incorporating explicit carve-out mechanisms into environmental and human rights treaties. Naming Indigenous groups and domestic laws within treaty texts can strengthen legal certainty and shield protections from erosion. The paper concludes with recommendations for negotiators, including legal audits, inter-ministerial coordination, and capacity-building to help states, particularly in the Global South, design carve-outs that reinforce Indigenous sovereignty.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Nature Conservation\",\"volume\":\"89 \",\"pages\":\"Article 127095\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Nature Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138125002729\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138125002729","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土著人民面临着来自采掘业和国家主导的发展的持续威胁,往往没有足够的法律保障。国际环境条约虽然提到土著人民的权利,但通常使用不具约束力的语言,使得执行不力或有选择性。本文旨在确定条约设计如何能够更有效地保护现有的国内土著保护。以贸易和投资法为例——比如新西兰的怀唐伊条约条款和哥伦比亚的保留清单——它主张系统地将明确的分割机制纳入环境和人权条约。在条约文本中命名土著群体和国内法可以加强法律确定性,保护措施不受侵蚀。报告最后对谈判代表提出了建议,包括法律审计、部际协调和能力建设,以帮助各国,特别是全球南方国家,设计出加强土著主权的分割方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advancing indigenous peoples’ sovereignty in international environmental treaties: a call for exception clauses in international trade and investment law
Indigenous peoples face persistent threats from extractive industries and state-led development, often without sufficient legal safeguards. International environmental treaties, while referencing Indigenous rights, typically use non-binding language that enables weak or selective implementation. This paper aims to identify how treaty design can more effectively protect existing domestic Indigenous protections. Drawing on trade and investment law examples—such as New Zealand’s Treaty of Waitangi clauses and Colombia’s reservation lists—it argues for systematically incorporating explicit carve-out mechanisms into environmental and human rights treaties. Naming Indigenous groups and domestic laws within treaty texts can strengthen legal certainty and shield protections from erosion. The paper concludes with recommendations for negotiators, including legal audits, inter-ministerial coordination, and capacity-building to help states, particularly in the Global South, design carve-outs that reinforce Indigenous sovereignty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Nature Conservation
Journal for Nature Conservation 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
7.9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation. Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信