“它有生命”:澳大利亚一所大学的年轻人重新评估食物“浪费”

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Febe De Geest , Jane Dyson , Sara Guest , Craig Jeffrey , Gyorgy Scrinis
{"title":"“它有生命”:澳大利亚一所大学的年轻人重新评估食物“浪费”","authors":"Febe De Geest ,&nbsp;Jane Dyson ,&nbsp;Sara Guest ,&nbsp;Craig Jeffrey ,&nbsp;Gyorgy Scrinis","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Scholars have increasingly paid attention to addressing food insecurity and environmental concerns through redistributing surplus food. Some scholars argue that surplus food initiatives may inadvertently reinforce existing structures that generate food waste and, to some extent, reproduce social inequalities and the power of corporate entities. However, there have been relatively few studies of whether and how surplus food initiatives provide value in people’s lives. Drawing on ethnographic research conducted with volunteers participating in Food Centre, an Australian university-based food initiative redistributing ‘rescued’ groceries, this study highlights the value of surplus food initiatives and how young people interpret them. While young people were sceptical about these initiatives for their potential to reproduce existing inequalities, they also suggested that such initiatives offered spaces for learning and socialising. Firstly, the surplus food initiative provided a space for students to ease some of the emotions they felt while accessing food relief. Participants also viewed the Food Centre as a platform for disseminating practical knowledge on recycling and reshaping societal perceptions of waste, aligning with their ethical commitments. In addition, the food rescue initiative provided a social space for young people to build community. Thus, surplus food redistribution schemes may not unsettle dominant food systems, but they might provide meaning to marginalised young people.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 104409"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘It has a life’: Youth revaluing food ‘waste’ at an Australian university\",\"authors\":\"Febe De Geest ,&nbsp;Jane Dyson ,&nbsp;Sara Guest ,&nbsp;Craig Jeffrey ,&nbsp;Gyorgy Scrinis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Scholars have increasingly paid attention to addressing food insecurity and environmental concerns through redistributing surplus food. Some scholars argue that surplus food initiatives may inadvertently reinforce existing structures that generate food waste and, to some extent, reproduce social inequalities and the power of corporate entities. However, there have been relatively few studies of whether and how surplus food initiatives provide value in people’s lives. Drawing on ethnographic research conducted with volunteers participating in Food Centre, an Australian university-based food initiative redistributing ‘rescued’ groceries, this study highlights the value of surplus food initiatives and how young people interpret them. While young people were sceptical about these initiatives for their potential to reproduce existing inequalities, they also suggested that such initiatives offered spaces for learning and socialising. Firstly, the surplus food initiative provided a space for students to ease some of the emotions they felt while accessing food relief. Participants also viewed the Food Centre as a platform for disseminating practical knowledge on recycling and reshaping societal perceptions of waste, aligning with their ethical commitments. In addition, the food rescue initiative provided a social space for young people to build community. Thus, surplus food redistribution schemes may not unsettle dominant food systems, but they might provide meaning to marginalised young people.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoforum\",\"volume\":\"166 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104409\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoforum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001671852500209X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001671852500209X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学者们越来越关注通过剩余粮食的再分配来解决粮食不安全和环境问题。一些学者认为,剩余食物倡议可能会无意中强化产生食物浪费的现有结构,并在某种程度上再现社会不平等和企业实体的权力。然而,关于剩余粮食倡议是否以及如何为人们的生活提供价值的研究相对较少。根据参与食品中心的志愿者进行的人种学研究,这是一个澳大利亚大学的食品倡议,重新分配“获救”的杂货,这项研究强调了剩余食品倡议的价值,以及年轻人如何解读它们。虽然年轻人对这些倡议是否有可能再现现有的不平等持怀疑态度,但他们也表示,这些倡议为学习和社交提供了空间。首先,剩余食物倡议为学生提供了一个空间,以缓解他们在获得食物救济时感受到的一些情绪。参加者亦视食物中心为传播回收实用知识及重塑社会对废物观念的平台,与他们的道德承诺保持一致。此外,粮食救援行动为年轻人建立社区提供了一个社交空间。因此,剩余粮食再分配计划可能不会扰乱占主导地位的粮食系统,但它们可能为被边缘化的年轻人提供意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘It has a life’: Youth revaluing food ‘waste’ at an Australian university
Scholars have increasingly paid attention to addressing food insecurity and environmental concerns through redistributing surplus food. Some scholars argue that surplus food initiatives may inadvertently reinforce existing structures that generate food waste and, to some extent, reproduce social inequalities and the power of corporate entities. However, there have been relatively few studies of whether and how surplus food initiatives provide value in people’s lives. Drawing on ethnographic research conducted with volunteers participating in Food Centre, an Australian university-based food initiative redistributing ‘rescued’ groceries, this study highlights the value of surplus food initiatives and how young people interpret them. While young people were sceptical about these initiatives for their potential to reproduce existing inequalities, they also suggested that such initiatives offered spaces for learning and socialising. Firstly, the surplus food initiative provided a space for students to ease some of the emotions they felt while accessing food relief. Participants also viewed the Food Centre as a platform for disseminating practical knowledge on recycling and reshaping societal perceptions of waste, aligning with their ethical commitments. In addition, the food rescue initiative provided a social space for young people to build community. Thus, surplus food redistribution schemes may not unsettle dominant food systems, but they might provide meaning to marginalised young people.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信