Curtis A. Lachowiez , B. Douglas Smith , Alexander Joseph Ambinder , Gary Binder , Anne Angiolillo , Ravi Potluri , Eros Papademetriou , Thomas W. LeBlanc
{"title":"依沃西替尼或维妥乐联合低甲基化药物治疗idh1突变的急性髓系白血病:一项现实世界的研究","authors":"Curtis A. Lachowiez , B. Douglas Smith , Alexander Joseph Ambinder , Gary Binder , Anne Angiolillo , Ravi Potluri , Eros Papademetriou , Thomas W. LeBlanc","doi":"10.1016/j.bneo.2025.100152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Abstract</h3><div>Approximately 10% of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND-AML) harbor the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 gene mutation (m<em>IDH1</em>). In this real-world study evaluating ivosidenib (IVO) + hypomethylating agents (HMAs; n = 181) vs venetoclax (VEN) + HMAs (n = 99) in patients with m<em>IDH1</em> ND-AML, those treated with IVO+HMA had higher rates of complete remission (CR; 42.5% vs 26.3%; <em>P</em> = .007), higher rates of composite CR + CR with incomplete platelet count recovery (63.0% vs 48.5%; <em>P</em> = .019), shorter median time to best response (3.3 vs 4.1 months; <em>P</em> = .006), and improved 6-month event-free survival (55.8% vs 38.4%; <em>P</em> = .006). Most patients treated with VEN received well under 28 days of VEN per cycle, likely due to anticipation of toxicity; outcomes with this short-schedule VEN were proportionately worse with fewer days of exposure per cycle. The between-group rate of grade ≥3 adverse events was similar within 30 days of treatment initiation, except for higher rates of febrile neutropenia for VEN+HMA vs IVO+HMA (8.1% vs 1.7%; <em>P</em> = .008). These findings support results from the phase 3 AGILE trial demonstrating IVO+HMA’s efficacy and favorable toxicity profile in patients with m<em>IDH1</em> ND-AML. IVO + azacitidine should be considered as the preferred standard of care treatment regimen in this patient subgroup.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100189,"journal":{"name":"Blood Neoplasia","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ivosidenib or venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents in IDH1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: a real-world study\",\"authors\":\"Curtis A. Lachowiez , B. Douglas Smith , Alexander Joseph Ambinder , Gary Binder , Anne Angiolillo , Ravi Potluri , Eros Papademetriou , Thomas W. LeBlanc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bneo.2025.100152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Abstract</h3><div>Approximately 10% of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND-AML) harbor the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 gene mutation (m<em>IDH1</em>). In this real-world study evaluating ivosidenib (IVO) + hypomethylating agents (HMAs; n = 181) vs venetoclax (VEN) + HMAs (n = 99) in patients with m<em>IDH1</em> ND-AML, those treated with IVO+HMA had higher rates of complete remission (CR; 42.5% vs 26.3%; <em>P</em> = .007), higher rates of composite CR + CR with incomplete platelet count recovery (63.0% vs 48.5%; <em>P</em> = .019), shorter median time to best response (3.3 vs 4.1 months; <em>P</em> = .006), and improved 6-month event-free survival (55.8% vs 38.4%; <em>P</em> = .006). Most patients treated with VEN received well under 28 days of VEN per cycle, likely due to anticipation of toxicity; outcomes with this short-schedule VEN were proportionately worse with fewer days of exposure per cycle. The between-group rate of grade ≥3 adverse events was similar within 30 days of treatment initiation, except for higher rates of febrile neutropenia for VEN+HMA vs IVO+HMA (8.1% vs 1.7%; <em>P</em> = .008). These findings support results from the phase 3 AGILE trial demonstrating IVO+HMA’s efficacy and favorable toxicity profile in patients with m<em>IDH1</em> ND-AML. IVO + azacitidine should be considered as the preferred standard of care treatment regimen in this patient subgroup.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Neoplasia\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Neoplasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950328025000871\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Neoplasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950328025000871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
大约10%的新诊断急性髓性白血病(ND-AML)患者携带异柠檬酸脱氢酶1基因突变(mIDH1)。在这个现实世界研究评估ivosidenib(伊)+ hypomethylating代理(HMAs; n = 181)、venetoclax (VEN) + HMAs (n = 99)患者mIDH1 ND-AML,那些接受伊+协会有更高的完全缓解率(CR; 42.5% vs 26.3%; P = .007),较高的复合CR + CR与不完整的血小板恢复(63.0% vs 48.5%; P = .019),更短的平均时间最好的回应(3.3 vs 4.1个月;P = .006),和改善生存6个月风平浪静(55.8% vs 38.4%; P = .006)。大多数接受VEN治疗的患者每个周期接受的VEN少于28天,可能是由于预期毒性;随着每个周期暴露天数的减少,这种短时间VEN的结果成比例地更差。在治疗开始的30天内,组间≥3级不良事件发生率相似,除了VEN+HMA与IVO+HMA的发热性中性粒细胞减少率更高(8.1% vs 1.7%; P = 0.008)。这些发现支持了3期AGILE试验的结果,表明IVO+HMA对mIDH1 ND-AML患者的疗效和良好的毒性特征。IVO +阿扎胞苷应被视为该患者亚组的首选标准护理治疗方案。
Ivosidenib or venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents in IDH1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: a real-world study
Abstract
Approximately 10% of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND-AML) harbor the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 gene mutation (mIDH1). In this real-world study evaluating ivosidenib (IVO) + hypomethylating agents (HMAs; n = 181) vs venetoclax (VEN) + HMAs (n = 99) in patients with mIDH1 ND-AML, those treated with IVO+HMA had higher rates of complete remission (CR; 42.5% vs 26.3%; P = .007), higher rates of composite CR + CR with incomplete platelet count recovery (63.0% vs 48.5%; P = .019), shorter median time to best response (3.3 vs 4.1 months; P = .006), and improved 6-month event-free survival (55.8% vs 38.4%; P = .006). Most patients treated with VEN received well under 28 days of VEN per cycle, likely due to anticipation of toxicity; outcomes with this short-schedule VEN were proportionately worse with fewer days of exposure per cycle. The between-group rate of grade ≥3 adverse events was similar within 30 days of treatment initiation, except for higher rates of febrile neutropenia for VEN+HMA vs IVO+HMA (8.1% vs 1.7%; P = .008). These findings support results from the phase 3 AGILE trial demonstrating IVO+HMA’s efficacy and favorable toxicity profile in patients with mIDH1 ND-AML. IVO + azacitidine should be considered as the preferred standard of care treatment regimen in this patient subgroup.