动机或阻力:从数字技术角度对智能电网和碳市场之间分位数网络溢出的多维分析

IF 12.5 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Sen Qiao , Yuan Chang , Meng Yang , Yi Jing Dang
{"title":"动机或阻力:从数字技术角度对智能电网和碳市场之间分位数网络溢出的多维分析","authors":"Sen Qiao ,&nbsp;Yuan Chang ,&nbsp;Meng Yang ,&nbsp;Yi Jing Dang","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The impact of digital technologies on risk contagion mechanisms in energy systems has emerged as a critical area of research. This study explores how digital technologies reshape risk contagion pathways between smart grids and carbon markets by integrating the time-varying parameter quantile vector autoregression model and network topology analysis. The findings indicate that: (1) Digital technologies amplify the short-term extreme risk linkages between smart grids and carbon markets, with the risk distribution exhibiting an asymmetric U-shaped pattern featuring a fatter left tail. (2) Risks propagate along this pathway: smart grid and ultra-high voltage → grid equipment → the carbon market. As the quantiles increase, the risks transmitted from the smart grid weaken, while the risks absorbed by the carbon market strengthen. (3) Driven by digital technologies, the risk network structure under extreme upward markets is more complex, characterized by dynamic shifts in the risk roles of ultra-high voltage and grid equipment over both short and long terms. However, the smart grid maintains the risk transmitter. (4) Under extreme downward markets, big data and cloud computing exacerbate risk contagion, whereas the mobile internet mitigates such contagion. Under extreme upward markets, artificial intelligence reinforces risk contagion, while big data and mobile internet alleviate such contagion. The results provide a reference for preventing cross-market risk contagion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 103053"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motivation or resistance: A multidimensional analysis of quantile network spillovers between smart grids and carbon markets from a digital technology perspective\",\"authors\":\"Sen Qiao ,&nbsp;Yuan Chang ,&nbsp;Meng Yang ,&nbsp;Yi Jing Dang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The impact of digital technologies on risk contagion mechanisms in energy systems has emerged as a critical area of research. This study explores how digital technologies reshape risk contagion pathways between smart grids and carbon markets by integrating the time-varying parameter quantile vector autoregression model and network topology analysis. The findings indicate that: (1) Digital technologies amplify the short-term extreme risk linkages between smart grids and carbon markets, with the risk distribution exhibiting an asymmetric U-shaped pattern featuring a fatter left tail. (2) Risks propagate along this pathway: smart grid and ultra-high voltage → grid equipment → the carbon market. As the quantiles increase, the risks transmitted from the smart grid weaken, while the risks absorbed by the carbon market strengthen. (3) Driven by digital technologies, the risk network structure under extreme upward markets is more complex, characterized by dynamic shifts in the risk roles of ultra-high voltage and grid equipment over both short and long terms. However, the smart grid maintains the risk transmitter. (4) Under extreme downward markets, big data and cloud computing exacerbate risk contagion, whereas the mobile internet mitigates such contagion. Under extreme upward markets, artificial intelligence reinforces risk contagion, while big data and mobile internet alleviate such contagion. The results provide a reference for preventing cross-market risk contagion.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology in Society\",\"volume\":\"83 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103053\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X2500243X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X2500243X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字技术对能源系统风险传染机制的影响已成为一个关键的研究领域。本研究通过整合时变参数分位数向量自回归模型和网络拓扑分析,探讨数字技术如何重塑智能电网和碳市场之间的风险传染途径。研究结果表明:(1)数字技术放大了智能电网与碳市场之间的短期极端风险联系,风险分布呈现出左尾较粗的不对称u型模式。(2)风险沿此路径传播:智能电网和特高压→电网设备→碳市场。随着分位数的增加,智能电网传递的风险减弱,而碳市场吸收的风险增强。(3)在数字技术的驱动下,极端上行市场下的风险网络结构更加复杂,超高压和电网设备的风险角色在短期和长期内都是动态变化的。然而,智能电网维护着风险传递者。(4)在市场极度下行的情况下,大数据和云计算加剧了风险传染,而移动互联网则缓解了风险传染。在市场极端上行的情况下,人工智能加剧了风险传染,而大数据和移动互联网则缓解了风险传染。研究结果为防范跨市场风险传染提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Motivation or resistance: A multidimensional analysis of quantile network spillovers between smart grids and carbon markets from a digital technology perspective
The impact of digital technologies on risk contagion mechanisms in energy systems has emerged as a critical area of research. This study explores how digital technologies reshape risk contagion pathways between smart grids and carbon markets by integrating the time-varying parameter quantile vector autoregression model and network topology analysis. The findings indicate that: (1) Digital technologies amplify the short-term extreme risk linkages between smart grids and carbon markets, with the risk distribution exhibiting an asymmetric U-shaped pattern featuring a fatter left tail. (2) Risks propagate along this pathway: smart grid and ultra-high voltage → grid equipment → the carbon market. As the quantiles increase, the risks transmitted from the smart grid weaken, while the risks absorbed by the carbon market strengthen. (3) Driven by digital technologies, the risk network structure under extreme upward markets is more complex, characterized by dynamic shifts in the risk roles of ultra-high voltage and grid equipment over both short and long terms. However, the smart grid maintains the risk transmitter. (4) Under extreme downward markets, big data and cloud computing exacerbate risk contagion, whereas the mobile internet mitigates such contagion. Under extreme upward markets, artificial intelligence reinforces risk contagion, while big data and mobile internet alleviate such contagion. The results provide a reference for preventing cross-market risk contagion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信