{"title":"线上优惠券和线下服务在全渠道零售中发挥跨渠道效应","authors":"Kebing Chen , Qinyi Zhang , Shengbin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2025.103423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper develops three channel models consisting of an online retailer and an offline counterpart, including the multichannel model, the buy-online pick-up in-store (BOPS) model, and the buy-online return in-store (BORS) model. First, we examine the impacts of online return rate and consumers’ return cost on the performance and optimal strategies of the retailers for each channel model. Then, we explore the conditions for the online retailer to adopt the omnichannel strategy (i.e., BOPS, BORS) and evaluate the resulting impact on the offline retailer’s profit. Next, we conduct the comparative analysis on the optimal decisions and performance of both online and offline retailers pre- and post-implementation of BOPS/BORS. Moreover, we also explore the scenario where the offline retailer offers coupons and consumers exhibit free-riding behavior. Our findings reveal that the choice between adopting BOPS or BORS depends on the return rate and return processing cost. Under the same external conditions (i.e., return rate, consumers’ return cost), a low return processing cost can prompt a stronger inclination toward BORS for the online retailer, whereas a higher cost push him to choose BOPS. After the implementation of omnichannel, the offline retailer’s profit from initial products is reduced, but the cross-selling opportunities are increased. Through the robustness analysis of the model, the motivation for adopting an omnichannel strategy remains largely unchanged when the offline retailer also offers coupons, although the threshold values are changed. Furthermore, the omnichannel motivation is influenced by the prevalence of free-riding behavior when such behaviors are taken into account.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 103423"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online coupon and offline service efforts in omnichannel retailing with cross-channel effect\",\"authors\":\"Kebing Chen , Qinyi Zhang , Shengbin Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.omega.2025.103423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper develops three channel models consisting of an online retailer and an offline counterpart, including the multichannel model, the buy-online pick-up in-store (BOPS) model, and the buy-online return in-store (BORS) model. First, we examine the impacts of online return rate and consumers’ return cost on the performance and optimal strategies of the retailers for each channel model. Then, we explore the conditions for the online retailer to adopt the omnichannel strategy (i.e., BOPS, BORS) and evaluate the resulting impact on the offline retailer’s profit. Next, we conduct the comparative analysis on the optimal decisions and performance of both online and offline retailers pre- and post-implementation of BOPS/BORS. Moreover, we also explore the scenario where the offline retailer offers coupons and consumers exhibit free-riding behavior. Our findings reveal that the choice between adopting BOPS or BORS depends on the return rate and return processing cost. Under the same external conditions (i.e., return rate, consumers’ return cost), a low return processing cost can prompt a stronger inclination toward BORS for the online retailer, whereas a higher cost push him to choose BOPS. After the implementation of omnichannel, the offline retailer’s profit from initial products is reduced, but the cross-selling opportunities are increased. Through the robustness analysis of the model, the motivation for adopting an omnichannel strategy remains largely unchanged when the offline retailer also offers coupons, although the threshold values are changed. Furthermore, the omnichannel motivation is influenced by the prevalence of free-riding behavior when such behaviors are taken into account.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"volume\":\"138 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103423\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048325001495\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048325001495","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
Online coupon and offline service efforts in omnichannel retailing with cross-channel effect
This paper develops three channel models consisting of an online retailer and an offline counterpart, including the multichannel model, the buy-online pick-up in-store (BOPS) model, and the buy-online return in-store (BORS) model. First, we examine the impacts of online return rate and consumers’ return cost on the performance and optimal strategies of the retailers for each channel model. Then, we explore the conditions for the online retailer to adopt the omnichannel strategy (i.e., BOPS, BORS) and evaluate the resulting impact on the offline retailer’s profit. Next, we conduct the comparative analysis on the optimal decisions and performance of both online and offline retailers pre- and post-implementation of BOPS/BORS. Moreover, we also explore the scenario where the offline retailer offers coupons and consumers exhibit free-riding behavior. Our findings reveal that the choice between adopting BOPS or BORS depends on the return rate and return processing cost. Under the same external conditions (i.e., return rate, consumers’ return cost), a low return processing cost can prompt a stronger inclination toward BORS for the online retailer, whereas a higher cost push him to choose BOPS. After the implementation of omnichannel, the offline retailer’s profit from initial products is reduced, but the cross-selling opportunities are increased. Through the robustness analysis of the model, the motivation for adopting an omnichannel strategy remains largely unchanged when the offline retailer also offers coupons, although the threshold values are changed. Furthermore, the omnichannel motivation is influenced by the prevalence of free-riding behavior when such behaviors are taken into account.
期刊介绍:
Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.