基于大规模遥感的草甘膦使用检测方法:荷兰的案例研究

IF 8.6 Q1 REMOTE SENSING
Yongjin Wang , Collin van Rooij , Julian Helfenstein , Wouter Meijninger , Maciej J. Soja , Arno Timmer , Gerbert Roerink
{"title":"基于大规模遥感的草甘膦使用检测方法:荷兰的案例研究","authors":"Yongjin Wang ,&nbsp;Collin van Rooij ,&nbsp;Julian Helfenstein ,&nbsp;Wouter Meijninger ,&nbsp;Maciej J. Soja ,&nbsp;Arno Timmer ,&nbsp;Gerbert Roerink","doi":"10.1016/j.jag.2025.104836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Glyphosate is a widely used herbicide, and given its potential threats to health and the environment, it is necessary to monitor its actual use. Currently there is no publicly available remote sensing method for detecting glyphosate use on a large scale. This study developed two glyphosate detection methods based on Sentinel-2 data and compared them in a case study over the entire Netherlands. The NDVI-method detects glyphosate use based on parcel-level NDVI variation, employing multiple constraints. The Color-method detects glyphosate use by analyzing parcel-level changes in spectral values, combining a random forest classifier with multi-temporal constraints. Training and validation data consisted of citizen-science observations from waarneming.nl platform and random parcels, both manually validated. Validation showed that the NDVI-method achieved median precision 0.51 and recall 0.52, and was more sensitive to phenomena gradually reducing NDVI in actual detection (e.g., multiple shallow tillage). The Color-method demonstrated better overall performance, with median precision 0.84 and recall 0.77. The areas of glyphosate use detected by the two methods were 52,682 and 38,923 ha, respectively. Analysis based on crop type changes and soil types revealed that for Dutch agricultural land in spring, glyphosate is mainly used on sandy soils, to destroy cover crops in cropland, and to remove grass or weeds entirely in grasslands for conversion to cropland. This study demonstrates the potential of remote sensing for quantifying glyphosate use at large spatial scales, making direct detection of glyphosate use possible. However, factors including regional climate and ploughing patterns affect data availability, remaining a limitation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73423,"journal":{"name":"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 104836"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large-scale remote sensing based methods for glyphosate usage detection: A case study in the Netherlands\",\"authors\":\"Yongjin Wang ,&nbsp;Collin van Rooij ,&nbsp;Julian Helfenstein ,&nbsp;Wouter Meijninger ,&nbsp;Maciej J. Soja ,&nbsp;Arno Timmer ,&nbsp;Gerbert Roerink\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jag.2025.104836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Glyphosate is a widely used herbicide, and given its potential threats to health and the environment, it is necessary to monitor its actual use. Currently there is no publicly available remote sensing method for detecting glyphosate use on a large scale. This study developed two glyphosate detection methods based on Sentinel-2 data and compared them in a case study over the entire Netherlands. The NDVI-method detects glyphosate use based on parcel-level NDVI variation, employing multiple constraints. The Color-method detects glyphosate use by analyzing parcel-level changes in spectral values, combining a random forest classifier with multi-temporal constraints. Training and validation data consisted of citizen-science observations from waarneming.nl platform and random parcels, both manually validated. Validation showed that the NDVI-method achieved median precision 0.51 and recall 0.52, and was more sensitive to phenomena gradually reducing NDVI in actual detection (e.g., multiple shallow tillage). The Color-method demonstrated better overall performance, with median precision 0.84 and recall 0.77. The areas of glyphosate use detected by the two methods were 52,682 and 38,923 ha, respectively. Analysis based on crop type changes and soil types revealed that for Dutch agricultural land in spring, glyphosate is mainly used on sandy soils, to destroy cover crops in cropland, and to remove grass or weeds entirely in grasslands for conversion to cropland. This study demonstrates the potential of remote sensing for quantifying glyphosate use at large spatial scales, making direct detection of glyphosate use possible. However, factors including regional climate and ploughing patterns affect data availability, remaining a limitation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal\",\"volume\":\"143 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104836\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843225004832\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REMOTE SENSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843225004832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

草甘膦是一种广泛使用的除草剂,鉴于其对健康和环境的潜在威胁,有必要对其实际使用情况进行监测。目前还没有公开可用的遥感方法来检测草甘膦的大规模使用。本研究基于Sentinel-2数据开发了两种草甘膦检测方法,并在整个荷兰的案例研究中进行了比较。NDVI方法基于包裹级NDVI变化检测草甘膦的使用,采用多种约束。color方法通过分析光谱值的包裹级变化来检测草甘膦的使用,将随机森林分类器与多时间约束相结合。训练和验证数据包括来自预警的公民科学观察。Nl平台和随机包裹,都手动验证。验证结果表明,NDVI方法的中位精度为0.51,召回率为0.52,对实际检测中NDVI逐渐降低的现象(如多次浅耕)更为敏感。Color-method表现出更好的整体性能,中位精度为0.84,召回率为0.77。两种方法检测到的草甘膦使用面积分别为52,682公顷和38,923公顷。根据作物类型变化和土壤类型分析,荷兰农用地春季草甘膦主要用于沙质土壤,破坏农田覆盖作物,将草地上的草或杂草全部清除,转为农田。该研究证明了遥感在大空间尺度上量化草甘膦使用的潜力,使直接检测草甘膦使用成为可能。然而,包括区域气候和耕作模式在内的因素影响数据的可用性,这仍然是一个限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Large-scale remote sensing based methods for glyphosate usage detection: A case study in the Netherlands
Glyphosate is a widely used herbicide, and given its potential threats to health and the environment, it is necessary to monitor its actual use. Currently there is no publicly available remote sensing method for detecting glyphosate use on a large scale. This study developed two glyphosate detection methods based on Sentinel-2 data and compared them in a case study over the entire Netherlands. The NDVI-method detects glyphosate use based on parcel-level NDVI variation, employing multiple constraints. The Color-method detects glyphosate use by analyzing parcel-level changes in spectral values, combining a random forest classifier with multi-temporal constraints. Training and validation data consisted of citizen-science observations from waarneming.nl platform and random parcels, both manually validated. Validation showed that the NDVI-method achieved median precision 0.51 and recall 0.52, and was more sensitive to phenomena gradually reducing NDVI in actual detection (e.g., multiple shallow tillage). The Color-method demonstrated better overall performance, with median precision 0.84 and recall 0.77. The areas of glyphosate use detected by the two methods were 52,682 and 38,923 ha, respectively. Analysis based on crop type changes and soil types revealed that for Dutch agricultural land in spring, glyphosate is mainly used on sandy soils, to destroy cover crops in cropland, and to remove grass or weeds entirely in grasslands for conversion to cropland. This study demonstrates the potential of remote sensing for quantifying glyphosate use at large spatial scales, making direct detection of glyphosate use possible. However, factors including regional climate and ploughing patterns affect data availability, remaining a limitation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal
International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Earth-Surface Processes, Computers in Earth Sciences
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
77 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation publishes original papers that utilize earth observation data for natural resource and environmental inventory and management. These data primarily originate from remote sensing platforms, including satellites and aircraft, supplemented by surface and subsurface measurements. Addressing natural resources such as forests, agricultural land, soils, and water, as well as environmental concerns like biodiversity, land degradation, and hazards, the journal explores conceptual and data-driven approaches. It covers geoinformation themes like capturing, databasing, visualization, interpretation, data quality, and spatial uncertainty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信