Johan Sundström, Anton Finnson, Elin Hynning, Geert De Kerf, Albin Fredriksson
{"title":"多个脑转移灶的分割改善了单等中心放射手术的剂量梯度。","authors":"Johan Sundström, Anton Finnson, Elin Hynning, Geert De Kerf, Albin Fredriksson","doi":"10.1002/mp.18117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>A growing number of cancer patients with brain metastases can benefit from stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) thanks to recent advances in systemic therapies which have led to improved survival. Meanwhile, selection criteria for SRS treatments are evolving to include patients with increasingly many metastases. With an increasing patient load, single-isocenter treatments on widely available C-arm linear accelerators are an attractive option. However, the planning of such treatments is challenging for multi-target cases due to the island blocking problem, which occurs when the multi-leaf collimator cannot conform to all targets simultaneously.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>We propose a multi-target partitioning algorithm that mitigates excessive exposure of normal tissue caused by the island blocking problem.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The proposed algorithm considers an initial set of arc trajectories and divides (partitions) the set of targets per trajectory into smaller subsets to treat with separate back-and-forth arc passes, simultaneously optimizing both the target subsets and collimator angles to minimize island blocking. We incorporated this algorithm into a fully automated treatment planning script and evaluated it on 20 simulated patient cases, each with 10 brain metastases and 21 Gy prescriptions. For each case, the script generated a series of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans with increasingly many arcs along the three trajectories. Each such plan was compared to four baseline plans generated with alternative heuristics for distributing targets across arcs. We also evaluated the algorithm retrospectively on six clinical cases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Partitioning significantly improved the gradient index (GI), global efficiency index (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n <mi>η</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>${\\rm G}\\eta$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) and brain <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>V</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mn>12</mn>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mi>Gy</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$\\text{V}_{12\\nobreakspace \\mathrm{Gy}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> compared to simultaneous treatment of all metastases. For example, the average GI improved from 5.9 to 3.3, <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n <mi>η</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>${\\rm G}\\eta$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> from 0.32 to 0.46, and normal brain <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>V</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mn>12</mn>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mi>Gy</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$\\text{V}_{12\\nobreakspace \\mathrm{Gy}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> from 49 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mi>c</mi>\n <msup>\n <mi>m</mi>\n <mn>3</mn>\n </msup>\n <mspace></mspace>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\,\\mathrm{c}\\mathrm{m}^{3}\\,$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> to 26 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mi>c</mi>\n <msup>\n <mi>m</mi>\n <mn>3</mn>\n </msup>\n <mspace></mspace>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\,\\mathrm{c}\\mathrm{m}^{3}\\,$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> between 3 and 9 arcs. The baseline plans improved similarly, but the proposed algorithm was significantly better at utilizing a limited budget of arcs. All target partitioning strategies increased the total number of monitor units (MUs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The dose gradient in single-isocenter VMAT plans can be substantially improved by treating a smaller subset of metastases at a time. This requires more MUs and arcs, implying a trade-off between delivery time and plan quality, which can be explored using the algorithm proposed in this paper.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Partitioning of multiple brain metastases improves dose gradients in single-isocenter radiosurgery\",\"authors\":\"Johan Sundström, Anton Finnson, Elin Hynning, Geert De Kerf, Albin Fredriksson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mp.18117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>A growing number of cancer patients with brain metastases can benefit from stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) thanks to recent advances in systemic therapies which have led to improved survival. Meanwhile, selection criteria for SRS treatments are evolving to include patients with increasingly many metastases. With an increasing patient load, single-isocenter treatments on widely available C-arm linear accelerators are an attractive option. However, the planning of such treatments is challenging for multi-target cases due to the island blocking problem, which occurs when the multi-leaf collimator cannot conform to all targets simultaneously.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>We propose a multi-target partitioning algorithm that mitigates excessive exposure of normal tissue caused by the island blocking problem.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The proposed algorithm considers an initial set of arc trajectories and divides (partitions) the set of targets per trajectory into smaller subsets to treat with separate back-and-forth arc passes, simultaneously optimizing both the target subsets and collimator angles to minimize island blocking. We incorporated this algorithm into a fully automated treatment planning script and evaluated it on 20 simulated patient cases, each with 10 brain metastases and 21 Gy prescriptions. For each case, the script generated a series of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans with increasingly many arcs along the three trajectories. Each such plan was compared to four baseline plans generated with alternative heuristics for distributing targets across arcs. We also evaluated the algorithm retrospectively on six clinical cases.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Partitioning significantly improved the gradient index (GI), global efficiency index (<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>G</mi>\\n <mi>η</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>${\\\\rm G}\\\\eta$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>) and brain <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>V</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>12</mn>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mi>Gy</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>$\\\\text{V}_{12\\\\nobreakspace \\\\mathrm{Gy}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> compared to simultaneous treatment of all metastases. For example, the average GI improved from 5.9 to 3.3, <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>G</mi>\\n <mi>η</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>${\\\\rm G}\\\\eta$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> from 0.32 to 0.46, and normal brain <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>V</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>12</mn>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mi>Gy</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>$\\\\text{V}_{12\\\\nobreakspace \\\\mathrm{Gy}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> from 49 <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mi>c</mi>\\n <msup>\\n <mi>m</mi>\\n <mn>3</mn>\\n </msup>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$\\\\,\\\\mathrm{c}\\\\mathrm{m}^{3}\\\\,$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> to 26 <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mi>c</mi>\\n <msup>\\n <mi>m</mi>\\n <mn>3</mn>\\n </msup>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$\\\\,\\\\mathrm{c}\\\\mathrm{m}^{3}\\\\,$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> between 3 and 9 arcs. The baseline plans improved similarly, but the proposed algorithm was significantly better at utilizing a limited budget of arcs. All target partitioning strategies increased the total number of monitor units (MUs).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The dose gradient in single-isocenter VMAT plans can be substantially improved by treating a smaller subset of metastases at a time. This requires more MUs and arcs, implying a trade-off between delivery time and plan quality, which can be explored using the algorithm proposed in this paper.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical physics\",\"volume\":\"52 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.18117\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.18117","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:越来越多的脑转移癌症患者可以从立体定向放射手术(SRS)中受益,这要归功于最近全身治疗的进展,这导致了生存率的提高。同时,SRS治疗的选择标准也在不断发展,包括越来越多的转移患者。随着患者负荷的增加,单等中心治疗广泛使用c臂线性加速器是一个有吸引力的选择。然而,当多叶准直器不能同时适应所有目标时,会出现岛阻塞问题,这给多目标情况下的处理规划带来挑战。目的:我们提出了一种多目标分割算法,以减轻由岛阻塞问题引起的正常组织过度暴露。方法:提出的算法考虑一组初始的圆弧轨迹,并将每条轨迹的目标集划分为更小的子集,以单独的来回圆弧通道进行处理,同时优化目标子集和准直器角度,以最小化岛阻塞。我们将该算法纳入全自动治疗计划脚本,并对20例模拟患者进行评估,每个患者有10例脑转移和21例Gy处方。对于每个病例,脚本生成了一系列的体积调制弧线治疗(VMAT)计划,在三个轨迹上有越来越多的弧线。每个这样的计划都与四个基线计划进行比较,这些基线计划是通过在弧线上分布目标的替代启发式方法生成的。我们还对6例临床病例回顾性评估了该算法。结果:与同时治疗所有转移瘤相比,分区显著提高了梯度指数(GI)、整体效率指数(G η ${\rm G}\eta$)和脑V 12 Gy $\text{V}_{12\nobreakspace \ mathm {Gy}}$。例如,平均GI从5.9提高到3.3,G η ${\rm G}\eta$从0.32提高到0.46,正常大脑V 12 Gy $\text{V}_{12\nobreakspace \ mathm {Gy}}$从49 c m³$ $,\ mathm {c}\ mathm {m}^{3} $,$提高到26 c m³$ $,\ mathm {c}\ mathm {m}^{3} $,$在3到9弧之间。基线计划也有类似的改进,但所提出的算法在利用有限的弧线预算方面明显更好。所有目标分区策略都增加了监视器单元(mu)的总数。结论:单等中心VMAT计划的剂量梯度可以通过一次治疗更小的转移亚群而得到显著改善。这需要更多的mu和arc,意味着交付时间和计划质量之间的权衡,可以使用本文提出的算法进行探索。
Partitioning of multiple brain metastases improves dose gradients in single-isocenter radiosurgery
Background
A growing number of cancer patients with brain metastases can benefit from stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) thanks to recent advances in systemic therapies which have led to improved survival. Meanwhile, selection criteria for SRS treatments are evolving to include patients with increasingly many metastases. With an increasing patient load, single-isocenter treatments on widely available C-arm linear accelerators are an attractive option. However, the planning of such treatments is challenging for multi-target cases due to the island blocking problem, which occurs when the multi-leaf collimator cannot conform to all targets simultaneously.
Purpose
We propose a multi-target partitioning algorithm that mitigates excessive exposure of normal tissue caused by the island blocking problem.
Methods
The proposed algorithm considers an initial set of arc trajectories and divides (partitions) the set of targets per trajectory into smaller subsets to treat with separate back-and-forth arc passes, simultaneously optimizing both the target subsets and collimator angles to minimize island blocking. We incorporated this algorithm into a fully automated treatment planning script and evaluated it on 20 simulated patient cases, each with 10 brain metastases and 21 Gy prescriptions. For each case, the script generated a series of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans with increasingly many arcs along the three trajectories. Each such plan was compared to four baseline plans generated with alternative heuristics for distributing targets across arcs. We also evaluated the algorithm retrospectively on six clinical cases.
Results
Partitioning significantly improved the gradient index (GI), global efficiency index () and brain compared to simultaneous treatment of all metastases. For example, the average GI improved from 5.9 to 3.3, from 0.32 to 0.46, and normal brain from 49 to 26 between 3 and 9 arcs. The baseline plans improved similarly, but the proposed algorithm was significantly better at utilizing a limited budget of arcs. All target partitioning strategies increased the total number of monitor units (MUs).
Conclusions
The dose gradient in single-isocenter VMAT plans can be substantially improved by treating a smaller subset of metastases at a time. This requires more MUs and arcs, implying a trade-off between delivery time and plan quality, which can be explored using the algorithm proposed in this paper.
期刊介绍:
Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments
Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.