在炎症性肠病试验中使用肠道超声的国际共识。

IF 8.7
Mariangela Allocca, Vipul Jairath, Bruce E Sands, David T Rubin, Bénédicte Caron, Valérie Laurent, Kerri Novak, Remo Panaccione, Peter Bossuyt, David H Bruining, Axel Dignass, Iris Dotan, Joel Fletcher, Mathurin Fumery, Federica Furfaro, Jonas Halfvarson, Ailsa Hart, Taku Kobayashi, Noa Krugliak Cleveland, Torsten Kucharzik, Andrea Laghi, Peter L Lakatos, Rupert W Leong, Edward V Loftus, Edouard Louis, Fernando Magro, Pablo A Olivera, Shaji Sebastian, Britta Siegmund, Stephan R Vavricka, Stephanie R Wilson, Jaap Stoker, Jordi Rimola, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Silvio Danese
{"title":"在炎症性肠病试验中使用肠道超声的国际共识。","authors":"Mariangela Allocca, Vipul Jairath, Bruce E Sands, David T Rubin, Bénédicte Caron, Valérie Laurent, Kerri Novak, Remo Panaccione, Peter Bossuyt, David H Bruining, Axel Dignass, Iris Dotan, Joel Fletcher, Mathurin Fumery, Federica Furfaro, Jonas Halfvarson, Ailsa Hart, Taku Kobayashi, Noa Krugliak Cleveland, Torsten Kucharzik, Andrea Laghi, Peter L Lakatos, Rupert W Leong, Edward V Loftus, Edouard Louis, Fernando Magro, Pablo A Olivera, Shaji Sebastian, Britta Siegmund, Stephan R Vavricka, Stephanie R Wilson, Jaap Stoker, Jordi Rimola, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Silvio Danese","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is increasingly used to monitor treatment efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) trials. However, standardized definitions for response, remission, and optimal assessment timing remain undefined.An international expert consensus meeting was held to establish IUS endpoints for clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A panel of 35 international gastroenterologists and radiologists participated in a modified Delphi process, reviewing the literature and developing consensus statements. Agreement was defined as at least 75% consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus was reached on 150 statements across four domains: general IBD (30 statements), luminal Crohn's disease (CD) (43), perianal CD (51), and ulcerative colitis (UC) (26). For luminal CD and UC, ultrasound response was defined by: (1) a ≥ 25% reduction in bowel wall thickness (BWT) from baseline, or (2) multifactorial improvement, combining BWT reduction with ≥1 grade decrease in colour Doppler signal (CDS) or another IUS parameter. Assessments were set at weeks 4-8 for the colon and week 12 for the terminal ileum. Ultrasound remission in luminal CD was defined as: (1) BWT normalization (≤3 mm), or (2) normalization of multiple parameters, including BWT, CDS and all other IUS parameters. Similar remission criteria were proposed for UC, but the sigmoid BWT normal range (3-4 mm) remained uncertain. The bowel ultrasound score (BUSS) for CD and the Milan ultrasound criteria (MUC) for UC were supported as standardized scoring system for trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This consensus provides standardized IUS definitions to enhance consistency in IBD trials, supporting the integration of IUS in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":94074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohn's & colitis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International consensus on the use of intestinal ultrasound in inflammatory bowel disease trials.\",\"authors\":\"Mariangela Allocca, Vipul Jairath, Bruce E Sands, David T Rubin, Bénédicte Caron, Valérie Laurent, Kerri Novak, Remo Panaccione, Peter Bossuyt, David H Bruining, Axel Dignass, Iris Dotan, Joel Fletcher, Mathurin Fumery, Federica Furfaro, Jonas Halfvarson, Ailsa Hart, Taku Kobayashi, Noa Krugliak Cleveland, Torsten Kucharzik, Andrea Laghi, Peter L Lakatos, Rupert W Leong, Edward V Loftus, Edouard Louis, Fernando Magro, Pablo A Olivera, Shaji Sebastian, Britta Siegmund, Stephan R Vavricka, Stephanie R Wilson, Jaap Stoker, Jordi Rimola, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Silvio Danese\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is increasingly used to monitor treatment efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) trials. However, standardized definitions for response, remission, and optimal assessment timing remain undefined.An international expert consensus meeting was held to establish IUS endpoints for clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A panel of 35 international gastroenterologists and radiologists participated in a modified Delphi process, reviewing the literature and developing consensus statements. Agreement was defined as at least 75% consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus was reached on 150 statements across four domains: general IBD (30 statements), luminal Crohn's disease (CD) (43), perianal CD (51), and ulcerative colitis (UC) (26). For luminal CD and UC, ultrasound response was defined by: (1) a ≥ 25% reduction in bowel wall thickness (BWT) from baseline, or (2) multifactorial improvement, combining BWT reduction with ≥1 grade decrease in colour Doppler signal (CDS) or another IUS parameter. Assessments were set at weeks 4-8 for the colon and week 12 for the terminal ileum. Ultrasound remission in luminal CD was defined as: (1) BWT normalization (≤3 mm), or (2) normalization of multiple parameters, including BWT, CDS and all other IUS parameters. Similar remission criteria were proposed for UC, but the sigmoid BWT normal range (3-4 mm) remained uncertain. The bowel ultrasound score (BUSS) for CD and the Milan ultrasound criteria (MUC) for UC were supported as standardized scoring system for trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This consensus provides standardized IUS definitions to enhance consistency in IBD trials, supporting the integration of IUS in future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Crohn's & colitis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Crohn's & colitis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohn's & colitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:肠超声(IUS)越来越多地用于监测炎症性肠病(IBD)试验的治疗效果。然而,反应、缓解和最佳评估时间的标准化定义仍未明确。召开了一次国际专家共识会议,以确定临床试验的IUS终点。方法:一个由35名国际胃肠病学家和放射科医生组成的小组参与了一个改进的德尔菲过程,回顾文献并形成共识声明。协议被定义为至少75%的共识。结果:在四个领域的150例陈述达成共识:一般IBD(30例),腔性克罗恩病(CD)(43例),肛周CD(51例)和溃疡性结肠炎(26例)。对于腔内CD和UC,超声应答的定义为:(1)肠壁厚度(BWT)较基线降低≥25%,或(2)多因素改善,BWT降低与彩色多普勒信号(CDS)或其他IUS参数降低≥1级相结合。4-8周结肠评估,12周回肠末端评估。超声缓解定义为:(1)BWT归一化(≤3mm),或(2)多个参数归一化,包括BWT、CDS及所有其他IUS参数。UC也提出了类似的缓解标准,但乙状结肠BWT的正常范围(3-4 mm)仍不确定。CD的肠超声评分(BUSS)和UC的米兰超声标准(MUC)被支持作为试验的标准化评分系统。结论:这一共识提供了标准化的IUS定义,以增强IBD试验的一致性,支持在未来研究中整合IUS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International consensus on the use of intestinal ultrasound in inflammatory bowel disease trials.

Background and aims: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is increasingly used to monitor treatment efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) trials. However, standardized definitions for response, remission, and optimal assessment timing remain undefined.An international expert consensus meeting was held to establish IUS endpoints for clinical trials.

Methods: A panel of 35 international gastroenterologists and radiologists participated in a modified Delphi process, reviewing the literature and developing consensus statements. Agreement was defined as at least 75% consensus.

Results: Consensus was reached on 150 statements across four domains: general IBD (30 statements), luminal Crohn's disease (CD) (43), perianal CD (51), and ulcerative colitis (UC) (26). For luminal CD and UC, ultrasound response was defined by: (1) a ≥ 25% reduction in bowel wall thickness (BWT) from baseline, or (2) multifactorial improvement, combining BWT reduction with ≥1 grade decrease in colour Doppler signal (CDS) or another IUS parameter. Assessments were set at weeks 4-8 for the colon and week 12 for the terminal ileum. Ultrasound remission in luminal CD was defined as: (1) BWT normalization (≤3 mm), or (2) normalization of multiple parameters, including BWT, CDS and all other IUS parameters. Similar remission criteria were proposed for UC, but the sigmoid BWT normal range (3-4 mm) remained uncertain. The bowel ultrasound score (BUSS) for CD and the Milan ultrasound criteria (MUC) for UC were supported as standardized scoring system for trials.

Conclusion: This consensus provides standardized IUS definitions to enhance consistency in IBD trials, supporting the integration of IUS in future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信