时间银行促进老年人公平的志愿服务而没有挤出效应:来自香港准实验研究的证据。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Shiyu Lu, Cheryl Chui, Terry Lum
{"title":"时间银行促进老年人公平的志愿服务而没有挤出效应:来自香港准实验研究的证据。","authors":"Shiyu Lu, Cheryl Chui, Terry Lum","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Timebanking has the potential as a social equalizer to promote volunteering for healthy aging. As a community-based system, it allows participants to exchange services or goods using time as currency-where one hour of service equals one time credit. However, there is limited understanding of whether timebanking might crowd out other volunteering participation elsewhere, and whether it perpetuates or alleviates social inequality of access to volunteering.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This article presents findings from a quasi-experimental study on a timebanking program for adults aged 50 and above in Hong Kong, conducted between January 2021 and August 2022. The study involved 116 participants in the timebanking group and 114 in a comparison group. Both groups engaged in volunteer activities at local community centers, but only the timebanking group could exchange earned time credits for rewards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After controlling for covariates, we found timebanking significantly increased within-program volunteering hours (T1: β = 0.56, p < 0.001; T2: β = 0.36, p = 0.003) without reducing other volunteering hours elsewhere. Effects were stronger among subgroups: adults aged 65 + (T1: β = 0.57, p = 0.021; T2: β = 0.63, p = 0.010), those with lower education (T1: β = 1.25, p = 0.001; T2: β = 1.24, p = 0.001), and individuals with multimorbidity (T1: β = 0.79, p = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Policymakers should integrate timebanking into community-based strategies to promote equity in late-life volunteering for healthy aging.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Timebanking Promotes Equitable Volunteering in Older Adults Without Crowding-Out Effects: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Study in Hong Kong.\",\"authors\":\"Shiyu Lu, Cheryl Chui, Terry Lum\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geront/gnaf200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Timebanking has the potential as a social equalizer to promote volunteering for healthy aging. As a community-based system, it allows participants to exchange services or goods using time as currency-where one hour of service equals one time credit. However, there is limited understanding of whether timebanking might crowd out other volunteering participation elsewhere, and whether it perpetuates or alleviates social inequality of access to volunteering.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This article presents findings from a quasi-experimental study on a timebanking program for adults aged 50 and above in Hong Kong, conducted between January 2021 and August 2022. The study involved 116 participants in the timebanking group and 114 in a comparison group. Both groups engaged in volunteer activities at local community centers, but only the timebanking group could exchange earned time credits for rewards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After controlling for covariates, we found timebanking significantly increased within-program volunteering hours (T1: β = 0.56, p < 0.001; T2: β = 0.36, p = 0.003) without reducing other volunteering hours elsewhere. Effects were stronger among subgroups: adults aged 65 + (T1: β = 0.57, p = 0.021; T2: β = 0.63, p = 0.010), those with lower education (T1: β = 1.25, p = 0.001; T2: β = 1.24, p = 0.001), and individuals with multimorbidity (T1: β = 0.79, p = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Policymakers should integrate timebanking into community-based strategies to promote equity in late-life volunteering for healthy aging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerontologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerontologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf200\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf200","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标:时间银行有潜力成为促进健康老龄化志愿服务的社会均衡器。作为一个以社区为基础的系统,它允许参与者用时间作为货币来交换服务或商品——一个小时的服务等于一个时间信用。然而,对于时间银行是否会挤占其他地方的其他志愿参与,以及它是否会延续或减轻获得志愿服务的社会不平等,人们的理解有限。研究设计和方法:本文介绍了一项准实验研究的结果,该研究是在2021年1月至2022年8月期间对香港50岁及以上成年人进行的时间银行计划。这项研究涉及时间银行组的116名参与者和对照组的114名参与者。两组志愿者都在当地社区中心参加志愿活动,但只有时间银行组可以用获得的时间积分换取奖励。结果:在控制协变量后,我们发现时间银行显著增加了项目内志愿服务时间(T1: β = 0.56, p)。讨论和启示:决策者应将时间银行整合到社区战略中,以促进健康老龄化老年志愿服务的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Timebanking Promotes Equitable Volunteering in Older Adults Without Crowding-Out Effects: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Study in Hong Kong.

Background and objectives: Timebanking has the potential as a social equalizer to promote volunteering for healthy aging. As a community-based system, it allows participants to exchange services or goods using time as currency-where one hour of service equals one time credit. However, there is limited understanding of whether timebanking might crowd out other volunteering participation elsewhere, and whether it perpetuates or alleviates social inequality of access to volunteering.

Research design and methods: This article presents findings from a quasi-experimental study on a timebanking program for adults aged 50 and above in Hong Kong, conducted between January 2021 and August 2022. The study involved 116 participants in the timebanking group and 114 in a comparison group. Both groups engaged in volunteer activities at local community centers, but only the timebanking group could exchange earned time credits for rewards.

Results: After controlling for covariates, we found timebanking significantly increased within-program volunteering hours (T1: β = 0.56, p < 0.001; T2: β = 0.36, p = 0.003) without reducing other volunteering hours elsewhere. Effects were stronger among subgroups: adults aged 65 + (T1: β = 0.57, p = 0.021; T2: β = 0.63, p = 0.010), those with lower education (T1: β = 1.25, p = 0.001; T2: β = 1.24, p = 0.001), and individuals with multimorbidity (T1: β = 0.79, p = 0.013).

Discussion and implications: Policymakers should integrate timebanking into community-based strategies to promote equity in late-life volunteering for healthy aging.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信