Erick Strange, Fernando R Altermatt, Luis Cáceres, Christopher Morrison, Luis Cortés, Nicolás Sumonte, Andrés Neyem
{"title":"门诊病人持续局部镇痛术后自动短信随访与电话随访:一项随机对照可行性试验。","authors":"Erick Strange, Fernando R Altermatt, Luis Cáceres, Christopher Morrison, Luis Cortés, Nicolás Sumonte, Andrés Neyem","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2025-106818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with continuous nerve blocks need structured follow-up, but daily phone calls are resource-intensive. Automated text messaging may offer a scalable alternative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized feasibility trial, 100 outpatients with continuous peripheral nerve catheters were assigned to either automated WhatsApp-based follow-up (mobile app group) or daily telephone calls (phone group) for 3 days. The primary outcome was usability, measured by the System Usability Scale (SUS, 0-100 scale; scores ≥68 indicate acceptable usability, ≥85 excellent usability). Secondary outcomes included satisfaction, response rates, reconsultations, and catheter-related events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 100 randomized patients, 91 were analyzed (46 mobile app group; 45 phone call group). The mobile app achieved a mean SUS score of 87.8, reflecting excellent usability. Satisfaction and response rates were high and similar between groups. Reconsultations were more frequent with the app (28.3% vs 6.7%), mainly non-urgent patient calls. Reports of minor catheter-related events were also more common in the app group (60.9% vs 37.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automated messaging is feasible, demonstrates excellent usability, and preserves patient satisfaction. The higher rates of minor symptom reporting and reconsultations highlight areas for refinement in future research.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT06313294.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative follow-up by automated text messaging versus telephone call in outpatient care with continuous regional analgesia: a randomized controlled feasibility trial.\",\"authors\":\"Erick Strange, Fernando R Altermatt, Luis Cáceres, Christopher Morrison, Luis Cortés, Nicolás Sumonte, Andrés Neyem\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2025-106818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with continuous nerve blocks need structured follow-up, but daily phone calls are resource-intensive. Automated text messaging may offer a scalable alternative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized feasibility trial, 100 outpatients with continuous peripheral nerve catheters were assigned to either automated WhatsApp-based follow-up (mobile app group) or daily telephone calls (phone group) for 3 days. The primary outcome was usability, measured by the System Usability Scale (SUS, 0-100 scale; scores ≥68 indicate acceptable usability, ≥85 excellent usability). Secondary outcomes included satisfaction, response rates, reconsultations, and catheter-related events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 100 randomized patients, 91 were analyzed (46 mobile app group; 45 phone call group). The mobile app achieved a mean SUS score of 87.8, reflecting excellent usability. Satisfaction and response rates were high and similar between groups. Reconsultations were more frequent with the app (28.3% vs 6.7%), mainly non-urgent patient calls. Reports of minor catheter-related events were also more common in the app group (60.9% vs 37.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automated messaging is feasible, demonstrates excellent usability, and preserves patient satisfaction. The higher rates of minor symptom reporting and reconsultations highlight areas for refinement in future research.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT06313294.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106818\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106818","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Postoperative follow-up by automated text messaging versus telephone call in outpatient care with continuous regional analgesia: a randomized controlled feasibility trial.
Background: Patients with continuous nerve blocks need structured follow-up, but daily phone calls are resource-intensive. Automated text messaging may offer a scalable alternative.
Methods: In this randomized feasibility trial, 100 outpatients with continuous peripheral nerve catheters were assigned to either automated WhatsApp-based follow-up (mobile app group) or daily telephone calls (phone group) for 3 days. The primary outcome was usability, measured by the System Usability Scale (SUS, 0-100 scale; scores ≥68 indicate acceptable usability, ≥85 excellent usability). Secondary outcomes included satisfaction, response rates, reconsultations, and catheter-related events.
Results: Out of 100 randomized patients, 91 were analyzed (46 mobile app group; 45 phone call group). The mobile app achieved a mean SUS score of 87.8, reflecting excellent usability. Satisfaction and response rates were high and similar between groups. Reconsultations were more frequent with the app (28.3% vs 6.7%), mainly non-urgent patient calls. Reports of minor catheter-related events were also more common in the app group (60.9% vs 37.8%).
Conclusions: Automated messaging is feasible, demonstrates excellent usability, and preserves patient satisfaction. The higher rates of minor symptom reporting and reconsultations highlight areas for refinement in future research.
期刊介绍:
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications.
Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).