Justine S Sefcik, Jeffrey T Boon, Harleah G Buck, Erica Frechman, Cara Wallace, Joan G Carpenter
{"title":"老年学家打击欺诈性研究参与者:从设计到传播的建议。","authors":"Justine S Sefcik, Jeffrey T Boon, Harleah G Buck, Erica Frechman, Cara Wallace, Joan G Carpenter","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper provides comprehensive guidance for gerontological researchers on preventing and identifying fraudulent research participants-from study design through dissemination. Drawing from our own experiences with identified fraudulent participants, we highlight the complex and often financially motivated nature of participant misrepresentation. These experiences inform our broad recommendations for researchers, funding bodies, and academic institutions, emphasizing protocol design focused on early detection of fraudulent participants including verification processes and proactive measures to uphold study integrity. Key recommendations include requiring a fraudulent participant detection plan in grant applications, training peer reviewers and research teams, and implementing regular data checks. We also discuss the importance of collaboration with Institutional Review Board representatives, funders, universities, and professional organizations who uphold scientific integrity of research accompanied by the dissemination of experiences to educate the scientific community. By normalizing the expectation of fraud and addressing it at multiple levels, we aim to enhance the reliability and trustworthiness of gerontological research. This paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers to safeguard their studies against fraudulent activities and maintain the credibility of their data.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gerontologists Combating Fraudulent Research Participants: Recommendations from Design to Dissemination.\",\"authors\":\"Justine S Sefcik, Jeffrey T Boon, Harleah G Buck, Erica Frechman, Cara Wallace, Joan G Carpenter\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geront/gnaf206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper provides comprehensive guidance for gerontological researchers on preventing and identifying fraudulent research participants-from study design through dissemination. Drawing from our own experiences with identified fraudulent participants, we highlight the complex and often financially motivated nature of participant misrepresentation. These experiences inform our broad recommendations for researchers, funding bodies, and academic institutions, emphasizing protocol design focused on early detection of fraudulent participants including verification processes and proactive measures to uphold study integrity. Key recommendations include requiring a fraudulent participant detection plan in grant applications, training peer reviewers and research teams, and implementing regular data checks. We also discuss the importance of collaboration with Institutional Review Board representatives, funders, universities, and professional organizations who uphold scientific integrity of research accompanied by the dissemination of experiences to educate the scientific community. By normalizing the expectation of fraud and addressing it at multiple levels, we aim to enhance the reliability and trustworthiness of gerontological research. This paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers to safeguard their studies against fraudulent activities and maintain the credibility of their data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerontologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerontologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf206\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf206","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Gerontologists Combating Fraudulent Research Participants: Recommendations from Design to Dissemination.
This paper provides comprehensive guidance for gerontological researchers on preventing and identifying fraudulent research participants-from study design through dissemination. Drawing from our own experiences with identified fraudulent participants, we highlight the complex and often financially motivated nature of participant misrepresentation. These experiences inform our broad recommendations for researchers, funding bodies, and academic institutions, emphasizing protocol design focused on early detection of fraudulent participants including verification processes and proactive measures to uphold study integrity. Key recommendations include requiring a fraudulent participant detection plan in grant applications, training peer reviewers and research teams, and implementing regular data checks. We also discuss the importance of collaboration with Institutional Review Board representatives, funders, universities, and professional organizations who uphold scientific integrity of research accompanied by the dissemination of experiences to educate the scientific community. By normalizing the expectation of fraud and addressing it at multiple levels, we aim to enhance the reliability and trustworthiness of gerontological research. This paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers to safeguard their studies against fraudulent activities and maintain the credibility of their data.
期刊介绍:
The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.