老年学家打击欺诈性研究参与者:从设计到传播的建议。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Justine S Sefcik, Jeffrey T Boon, Harleah G Buck, Erica Frechman, Cara Wallace, Joan G Carpenter
{"title":"老年学家打击欺诈性研究参与者:从设计到传播的建议。","authors":"Justine S Sefcik, Jeffrey T Boon, Harleah G Buck, Erica Frechman, Cara Wallace, Joan G Carpenter","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper provides comprehensive guidance for gerontological researchers on preventing and identifying fraudulent research participants-from study design through dissemination. Drawing from our own experiences with identified fraudulent participants, we highlight the complex and often financially motivated nature of participant misrepresentation. These experiences inform our broad recommendations for researchers, funding bodies, and academic institutions, emphasizing protocol design focused on early detection of fraudulent participants including verification processes and proactive measures to uphold study integrity. Key recommendations include requiring a fraudulent participant detection plan in grant applications, training peer reviewers and research teams, and implementing regular data checks. We also discuss the importance of collaboration with Institutional Review Board representatives, funders, universities, and professional organizations who uphold scientific integrity of research accompanied by the dissemination of experiences to educate the scientific community. By normalizing the expectation of fraud and addressing it at multiple levels, we aim to enhance the reliability and trustworthiness of gerontological research. This paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers to safeguard their studies against fraudulent activities and maintain the credibility of their data.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gerontologists Combating Fraudulent Research Participants: Recommendations from Design to Dissemination.\",\"authors\":\"Justine S Sefcik, Jeffrey T Boon, Harleah G Buck, Erica Frechman, Cara Wallace, Joan G Carpenter\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geront/gnaf206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper provides comprehensive guidance for gerontological researchers on preventing and identifying fraudulent research participants-from study design through dissemination. Drawing from our own experiences with identified fraudulent participants, we highlight the complex and often financially motivated nature of participant misrepresentation. These experiences inform our broad recommendations for researchers, funding bodies, and academic institutions, emphasizing protocol design focused on early detection of fraudulent participants including verification processes and proactive measures to uphold study integrity. Key recommendations include requiring a fraudulent participant detection plan in grant applications, training peer reviewers and research teams, and implementing regular data checks. We also discuss the importance of collaboration with Institutional Review Board representatives, funders, universities, and professional organizations who uphold scientific integrity of research accompanied by the dissemination of experiences to educate the scientific community. By normalizing the expectation of fraud and addressing it at multiple levels, we aim to enhance the reliability and trustworthiness of gerontological research. This paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers to safeguard their studies against fraudulent activities and maintain the credibility of their data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerontologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerontologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf206\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf206","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文为老年学研究人员提供了从研究设计到传播预防和识别欺诈研究参与者的综合指导。根据我们自己与已确定的欺诈参与者的经验,我们强调了参与者虚假陈述的复杂性和往往是出于经济动机的性质。这些经验为研究人员、资助机构和学术机构提供了广泛的建议,强调方案设计的重点是早期发现欺诈参与者,包括验证过程和积极措施,以维护研究的完整性。主要建议包括要求在资助申请中制定欺诈参与者检测计划,培训同行评议人和研究团队,以及实施定期数据检查。我们还讨论了与机构审查委员会代表、资助者、大学和专业组织合作的重要性,这些组织维护研究的科学完整性,同时传播经验以教育科学界。通过规范欺诈预期并在多个层面解决欺诈问题,我们的目标是提高老年学研究的可靠性和可信度。本文为研究人员提供了宝贵的资源,以保护他们的研究免受欺诈活动的影响,并保持他们的数据的可信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gerontologists Combating Fraudulent Research Participants: Recommendations from Design to Dissemination.

This paper provides comprehensive guidance for gerontological researchers on preventing and identifying fraudulent research participants-from study design through dissemination. Drawing from our own experiences with identified fraudulent participants, we highlight the complex and often financially motivated nature of participant misrepresentation. These experiences inform our broad recommendations for researchers, funding bodies, and academic institutions, emphasizing protocol design focused on early detection of fraudulent participants including verification processes and proactive measures to uphold study integrity. Key recommendations include requiring a fraudulent participant detection plan in grant applications, training peer reviewers and research teams, and implementing regular data checks. We also discuss the importance of collaboration with Institutional Review Board representatives, funders, universities, and professional organizations who uphold scientific integrity of research accompanied by the dissemination of experiences to educate the scientific community. By normalizing the expectation of fraud and addressing it at multiple levels, we aim to enhance the reliability and trustworthiness of gerontological research. This paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers to safeguard their studies against fraudulent activities and maintain the credibility of their data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信