Shiyi Li, Ting Xu, Chengjun Zhu, Haixia Shan, Hong Xu, Jun Zhou, Lei Yang, Tongbo Yi, Xiaohong Wu, Yusong Zhang, Li Xie, Lili Zhang, Yuan Yuan
{"title":"吡罗替尼在her2阳性转移性乳腺癌中的生存分析:一项多中心现实世界研究。","authors":"Shiyi Li, Ting Xu, Chengjun Zhu, Haixia Shan, Hong Xu, Jun Zhou, Lei Yang, Tongbo Yi, Xiaohong Wu, Yusong Zhang, Li Xie, Lili Zhang, Yuan Yuan","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In previous clinical trials, pyrotinib has shown good antitumor activity and manageable toxicity in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, real-world data on pyrotinib remain limited. In this study, we reported the latest real-world data on the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in HER2-positive MBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study included 337 HER2-positive MBC patients treated with pyrotinib between October 2016 and October 2024. We reported the analysis of the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in HER2-positive MBC. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As of 1st April 2025, the median follow-up duration was 42.6 months (range, 2.0-92.7). The median line of treatment was two. The median PFS was 15.3 months (95% CI, 12.9-17.6). By treatment line, the median PFS was 21.4 months (95% CI, 10.1-32.6) for first-line treatment, 14.8 months (95% CI, 11.4-18.1) and 10.9 months (95% CI, 8.1-13.7) for second-line and third-line or above treatment. The 3-year OS rate was 54.6% overall, with 63.2%, 61.1%, and 37.7% for first-line, second-line, and third-line or above treatment. The ORR, DCR, and CBR were 41.5%, 91.2%, and 80.0%. We further analyzed 57 patients with brain metastases (BM). The result showed that the median duration of response (DoR) and time to response (IQR) of radiotherapy-naïve ones were 12.6 months (95% CI, 6.8-18.4) and 1.7 months (95% CI, 1.3-2.2), respectively. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse event was diarrhea. No treatment-related deaths were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The updated analysis demonstrated that pyrotinib could be a promising treatment option in HER2-positive MBC with acceptable toxicity in the real world. Survival is still under assessment with longer follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival analysis of pyrotinib in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter real-world study.\",\"authors\":\"Shiyi Li, Ting Xu, Chengjun Zhu, Haixia Shan, Hong Xu, Jun Zhou, Lei Yang, Tongbo Yi, Xiaohong Wu, Yusong Zhang, Li Xie, Lili Zhang, Yuan Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In previous clinical trials, pyrotinib has shown good antitumor activity and manageable toxicity in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, real-world data on pyrotinib remain limited. In this study, we reported the latest real-world data on the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in HER2-positive MBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study included 337 HER2-positive MBC patients treated with pyrotinib between October 2016 and October 2024. We reported the analysis of the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in HER2-positive MBC. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As of 1st April 2025, the median follow-up duration was 42.6 months (range, 2.0-92.7). The median line of treatment was two. The median PFS was 15.3 months (95% CI, 12.9-17.6). By treatment line, the median PFS was 21.4 months (95% CI, 10.1-32.6) for first-line treatment, 14.8 months (95% CI, 11.4-18.1) and 10.9 months (95% CI, 8.1-13.7) for second-line and third-line or above treatment. The 3-year OS rate was 54.6% overall, with 63.2%, 61.1%, and 37.7% for first-line, second-line, and third-line or above treatment. The ORR, DCR, and CBR were 41.5%, 91.2%, and 80.0%. We further analyzed 57 patients with brain metastases (BM). The result showed that the median duration of response (DoR) and time to response (IQR) of radiotherapy-naïve ones were 12.6 months (95% CI, 6.8-18.4) and 1.7 months (95% CI, 1.3-2.2), respectively. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse event was diarrhea. No treatment-related deaths were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The updated analysis demonstrated that pyrotinib could be a promising treatment option in HER2-positive MBC with acceptable toxicity in the real world. Survival is still under assessment with longer follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf296\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf296","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Survival analysis of pyrotinib in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter real-world study.
Background: In previous clinical trials, pyrotinib has shown good antitumor activity and manageable toxicity in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, real-world data on pyrotinib remain limited. In this study, we reported the latest real-world data on the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in HER2-positive MBC.
Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 337 HER2-positive MBC patients treated with pyrotinib between October 2016 and October 2024. We reported the analysis of the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in HER2-positive MBC. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results: As of 1st April 2025, the median follow-up duration was 42.6 months (range, 2.0-92.7). The median line of treatment was two. The median PFS was 15.3 months (95% CI, 12.9-17.6). By treatment line, the median PFS was 21.4 months (95% CI, 10.1-32.6) for first-line treatment, 14.8 months (95% CI, 11.4-18.1) and 10.9 months (95% CI, 8.1-13.7) for second-line and third-line or above treatment. The 3-year OS rate was 54.6% overall, with 63.2%, 61.1%, and 37.7% for first-line, second-line, and third-line or above treatment. The ORR, DCR, and CBR were 41.5%, 91.2%, and 80.0%. We further analyzed 57 patients with brain metastases (BM). The result showed that the median duration of response (DoR) and time to response (IQR) of radiotherapy-naïve ones were 12.6 months (95% CI, 6.8-18.4) and 1.7 months (95% CI, 1.3-2.2), respectively. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse event was diarrhea. No treatment-related deaths were reported.
Conclusion: The updated analysis demonstrated that pyrotinib could be a promising treatment option in HER2-positive MBC with acceptable toxicity in the real world. Survival is still under assessment with longer follow-up.
期刊介绍:
The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.