Janice F Bell, Robin L Whitney, Tina R Kilaberia, Benjamin M Link, Orly Tonkikh, Heather M Young
{"title":"比较老年人的照顾者在州和国家调查那些寻求帮助在加州的照顾者资源中心。","authors":"Janice F Bell, Robin L Whitney, Tina R Kilaberia, Benjamin M Link, Orly Tonkikh, Heather M Young","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Large population-based surveys are often used in caregiver research and to support policy, while caregivers seeking help and resources-key targets of the 2022 National Strategy to Support Family Caregivers-have not been fully described. We describe and compare caregiver attributes in a California-wide population seeking support to those in state and national surveys.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This descriptive comparative study harmonized and compared variables across four data sources (2020-2022): Caregiving in the US (CGUS; n = 1,089); National Study of Caregiving (NSOC; n = 1,885) California Health Interview Survey (CHIS; n = 2,159); and CareNav™, a web-based application supporting services in California-based Caregiver Resource Centers (CRC; n = 5,967).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More CRC caregivers were female, older, married or partnered, and caring for someone with Alzheimer's disease or dementia. They were more likely to provide care for ≥40 hours/week (74% vs. 10% CHIS; 22% CGUS; 16% NSOC); support activities of daily living (94% vs. 68% CGUS), perform medical/nursing tasks (83% vs. 59% CGUS; 10% NSOC) and provide high-intensity care (90% vs. 40% CGUS). More CRC caregivers reported fair/poor health (34% vs. 18% CHIS; 18% CGUS; 21% NSOC), loneliness (21% vs. 2% CHIS), and worse health due to caregiving (31% vs. 15% CHIS; 21% NSOC).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Caregivers seeking help and resources provide more full-time, high intensity care with more impact on well-being compared to caregivers in large probabilistic samples. Reliance solely on population-based surveys to set targets to support caregivers, monitor progress, or allocate resources may miss the caregivers that need help the most.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Caregivers of Older Adults in State and National Surveys to Those seeking Help in California's Caregiver Resource Centers.\",\"authors\":\"Janice F Bell, Robin L Whitney, Tina R Kilaberia, Benjamin M Link, Orly Tonkikh, Heather M Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geront/gnaf192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Large population-based surveys are often used in caregiver research and to support policy, while caregivers seeking help and resources-key targets of the 2022 National Strategy to Support Family Caregivers-have not been fully described. We describe and compare caregiver attributes in a California-wide population seeking support to those in state and national surveys.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This descriptive comparative study harmonized and compared variables across four data sources (2020-2022): Caregiving in the US (CGUS; n = 1,089); National Study of Caregiving (NSOC; n = 1,885) California Health Interview Survey (CHIS; n = 2,159); and CareNav™, a web-based application supporting services in California-based Caregiver Resource Centers (CRC; n = 5,967).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More CRC caregivers were female, older, married or partnered, and caring for someone with Alzheimer's disease or dementia. They were more likely to provide care for ≥40 hours/week (74% vs. 10% CHIS; 22% CGUS; 16% NSOC); support activities of daily living (94% vs. 68% CGUS), perform medical/nursing tasks (83% vs. 59% CGUS; 10% NSOC) and provide high-intensity care (90% vs. 40% CGUS). More CRC caregivers reported fair/poor health (34% vs. 18% CHIS; 18% CGUS; 21% NSOC), loneliness (21% vs. 2% CHIS), and worse health due to caregiving (31% vs. 15% CHIS; 21% NSOC).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Caregivers seeking help and resources provide more full-time, high intensity care with more impact on well-being compared to caregivers in large probabilistic samples. Reliance solely on population-based surveys to set targets to support caregivers, monitor progress, or allocate resources may miss the caregivers that need help the most.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerontologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerontologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf192\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf192","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目标:大型人口调查经常用于护理人员研究和支持政策,而寻求帮助和资源的护理人员(2022年支持家庭护理人员国家战略的关键目标)尚未得到充分描述。我们描述并比较了加州范围内寻求支持的人群与州和国家调查中寻求支持的人群的护理人员属性。研究设计和方法:这项描述性比较研究协调和比较了四个数据源(2020-2022)的变量:美国的护理(CGUS, n = 1,089);加州健康访谈调查(CHIS); n = 2159;以及CareNav™,这是一个基于网络的应用程序,支持位于加州的护理人员资源中心(CRC; n = 5,967)的服务。结果:更多的CRC护理人员是女性,年龄较大,已婚或有伴侣,并且照顾患有阿尔茨海默病或痴呆症的人。他们更有可能提供≥40小时/周的护理(74% vs. 10% CHIS; 22% CGUS; 16% NSOC);支持日常生活活动(94%对68%的cgu),执行医疗/护理任务(83%对59%的cgu; 10%的NSOC)并提供高强度护理(90%对40%的cgu)。更多的CRC护理人员报告健康状况一般/较差(34%对18% CHIS; 18% CGUS; 21% NSOC),孤独(21%对2% CHIS),以及由于护理而导致的健康状况恶化(31%对15% CHIS; 21% NSOC)。讨论与启示:在大概率样本中,寻求帮助和资源的护理者提供更多的全职、高强度护理,对幸福感的影响更大。仅仅依靠基于人口的调查来设定目标,以支持护理人员、监测进展或分配资源,可能会错过最需要帮助的护理人员。
Comparison of Caregivers of Older Adults in State and National Surveys to Those seeking Help in California's Caregiver Resource Centers.
Background and objectives: Large population-based surveys are often used in caregiver research and to support policy, while caregivers seeking help and resources-key targets of the 2022 National Strategy to Support Family Caregivers-have not been fully described. We describe and compare caregiver attributes in a California-wide population seeking support to those in state and national surveys.
Research design and methods: This descriptive comparative study harmonized and compared variables across four data sources (2020-2022): Caregiving in the US (CGUS; n = 1,089); National Study of Caregiving (NSOC; n = 1,885) California Health Interview Survey (CHIS; n = 2,159); and CareNav™, a web-based application supporting services in California-based Caregiver Resource Centers (CRC; n = 5,967).
Results: More CRC caregivers were female, older, married or partnered, and caring for someone with Alzheimer's disease or dementia. They were more likely to provide care for ≥40 hours/week (74% vs. 10% CHIS; 22% CGUS; 16% NSOC); support activities of daily living (94% vs. 68% CGUS), perform medical/nursing tasks (83% vs. 59% CGUS; 10% NSOC) and provide high-intensity care (90% vs. 40% CGUS). More CRC caregivers reported fair/poor health (34% vs. 18% CHIS; 18% CGUS; 21% NSOC), loneliness (21% vs. 2% CHIS), and worse health due to caregiving (31% vs. 15% CHIS; 21% NSOC).
Discussion and implications: Caregivers seeking help and resources provide more full-time, high intensity care with more impact on well-being compared to caregivers in large probabilistic samples. Reliance solely on population-based surveys to set targets to support caregivers, monitor progress, or allocate resources may miss the caregivers that need help the most.
期刊介绍:
The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.