利用高保真动态动物实验室模块获得先进的手术技能是外科住院医师高度期望的。

IF 2.1
Clayton Wyland, Omar Shaikh, Deirdre Sheets, Saad Shebrain
{"title":"利用高保真动态动物实验室模块获得先进的手术技能是外科住院医师高度期望的。","authors":"Clayton Wyland, Omar Shaikh, Deirdre Sheets, Saad Shebrain","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The American College of Surgeons/Association of Program Directors in Surgery (ACS/APDS) in 2007 to 2008 created a 3-phase Surgery Resident Skills Curriculum to enhance resident training through reproducible simulations before operative experience: Phase 1 (basic surgical skills), Phase 2 (advanced skills/procedures), and Phase 3 (team-based skills). Animal models provide a unique real-world dynamic live experience simulating the operating room (OR). The study assesses residents' feedback/satisfaction on utilizing animal models for advanced/complex procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed evaluations completed by residents from 2008 to 2024 for procedures included in ACS/APDS phases 1/2 and complex procedures in a faculty-proctored animal laboratory. Residents scored their experience on Likert scale from 1 to 4 (1 = unacceptable, 2 = marginal, 3 = Good, and 4 = Excellent). Five areas were assessed, including Tasks for the Training Level, Degree of Difficulty for the Training Level, Preparation for the lab, Setting, and Guidance. Additionally, residents were allowed to provide comments on their feedback. Descriptive statistics were calculated. The chi-squared test was used. We used SPSS (29.0) in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three general surgery residents [31 (58.5%) males, and 22 (41.5%) females] completed 114 evaluations as follows: 43 assessments (37.7%) by PGY1, 38 (33.3%) by PGY2, 14 (12.3%) by PGY3, 12 (10.5%) by PGY4, and 7 (6.1%) by PGY5. Residents' feedback was positive, with all assessed areas receiving favorable grading (i.e., excellent/good), with 93% for Tasks for Training Level, 92.1% for Degree of Difficulty for Training Level, 90.4% for Preparation, 97.4% for Setting, and 93% Guidance). Less than 10% of the assessed area received marginal scores by PGY1 and PGY2. Animal labs were highly desired by senior residents (Table 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Animal laboratories are highly desired by residents and provide unique opportunities to perform advanced/complex procedures, similar to OR environment, but importantly, in a safe setting before operating on humans.</p>","PeriodicalId":94109,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical education","volume":" ","pages":"103693"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acquisition of Advanced Surgical Skills Utilizing High-Fidelity Dynamic Animal Laboratory Modules is Highly Desired by Surgery Residents.\",\"authors\":\"Clayton Wyland, Omar Shaikh, Deirdre Sheets, Saad Shebrain\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The American College of Surgeons/Association of Program Directors in Surgery (ACS/APDS) in 2007 to 2008 created a 3-phase Surgery Resident Skills Curriculum to enhance resident training through reproducible simulations before operative experience: Phase 1 (basic surgical skills), Phase 2 (advanced skills/procedures), and Phase 3 (team-based skills). Animal models provide a unique real-world dynamic live experience simulating the operating room (OR). The study assesses residents' feedback/satisfaction on utilizing animal models for advanced/complex procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed evaluations completed by residents from 2008 to 2024 for procedures included in ACS/APDS phases 1/2 and complex procedures in a faculty-proctored animal laboratory. Residents scored their experience on Likert scale from 1 to 4 (1 = unacceptable, 2 = marginal, 3 = Good, and 4 = Excellent). Five areas were assessed, including Tasks for the Training Level, Degree of Difficulty for the Training Level, Preparation for the lab, Setting, and Guidance. Additionally, residents were allowed to provide comments on their feedback. Descriptive statistics were calculated. The chi-squared test was used. We used SPSS (29.0) in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three general surgery residents [31 (58.5%) males, and 22 (41.5%) females] completed 114 evaluations as follows: 43 assessments (37.7%) by PGY1, 38 (33.3%) by PGY2, 14 (12.3%) by PGY3, 12 (10.5%) by PGY4, and 7 (6.1%) by PGY5. Residents' feedback was positive, with all assessed areas receiving favorable grading (i.e., excellent/good), with 93% for Tasks for Training Level, 92.1% for Degree of Difficulty for Training Level, 90.4% for Preparation, 97.4% for Setting, and 93% Guidance). Less than 10% of the assessed area received marginal scores by PGY1 and PGY2. Animal labs were highly desired by senior residents (Table 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Animal laboratories are highly desired by residents and provide unique opportunities to perform advanced/complex procedures, similar to OR environment, but importantly, in a safe setting before operating on humans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of surgical education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"103693\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of surgical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103693\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国外科医师学会/外科项目主任协会(ACS/APDS)于2007年至2008年创建了一个分三个阶段的外科住院医师技能课程,通过在手术前可重复的模拟来加强住院医师培训:第一阶段(基本手术技能),第二阶段(高级技能/程序)和第三阶段(团队合作技能)。动物模型提供了一个独特的真实世界的动态现场体验,模拟手术室(OR)。本研究评估住院医师对利用动物模型进行高级/复杂手术的反馈/满意度。方法:我们回顾性分析了2008年至2024年住院医师对ACS/APDS第1/2期手术和在教师监督的动物实验室完成的复杂手术的评估。居民用李克特量表从1到4给他们的体验打分(1 = 不可接受,2 = 边际,3 = 良好,4 = 优秀)。评估了五个方面,包括培训级别的任务,培训级别的难度程度,实验室准备,设置和指导。此外,居民还可以对他们的反馈意见进行评论。进行描述性统计。采用卡方检验。我们使用SPSS(29.0)进行分析。结果:53名普外科住院医师[男性31人(58.5%),女性22人(41.5%)]完成114项评估,其中PGY1评估43人(37.7%),PGY2评估38人(33.3%),PGY3评估14人(12.3%),PGY4评估12人(10.5%),PGY5评估7人(6.1%)。居民的反馈是积极的,所有评估领域都得到了良好的评分(即优秀/良好),93%的人认为培训水平的任务,92.1%的人认为培训水平的难度程度,90.4%的人认为准备,97.4%的人认为设置,93%的人认为指导)。不到10%的评估区域获得了PGY1和PGY2的边际分数。老年居民非常希望有动物实验室(表1)。结论:动物实验室是居民非常需要的,并且提供了独特的机会来进行高级/复杂的手术,类似于手术室的环境,但重要的是,在对人类进行手术之前,在安全的环境中进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acquisition of Advanced Surgical Skills Utilizing High-Fidelity Dynamic Animal Laboratory Modules is Highly Desired by Surgery Residents.

Background: The American College of Surgeons/Association of Program Directors in Surgery (ACS/APDS) in 2007 to 2008 created a 3-phase Surgery Resident Skills Curriculum to enhance resident training through reproducible simulations before operative experience: Phase 1 (basic surgical skills), Phase 2 (advanced skills/procedures), and Phase 3 (team-based skills). Animal models provide a unique real-world dynamic live experience simulating the operating room (OR). The study assesses residents' feedback/satisfaction on utilizing animal models for advanced/complex procedures.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed evaluations completed by residents from 2008 to 2024 for procedures included in ACS/APDS phases 1/2 and complex procedures in a faculty-proctored animal laboratory. Residents scored their experience on Likert scale from 1 to 4 (1 = unacceptable, 2 = marginal, 3 = Good, and 4 = Excellent). Five areas were assessed, including Tasks for the Training Level, Degree of Difficulty for the Training Level, Preparation for the lab, Setting, and Guidance. Additionally, residents were allowed to provide comments on their feedback. Descriptive statistics were calculated. The chi-squared test was used. We used SPSS (29.0) in the analysis.

Results: Fifty-three general surgery residents [31 (58.5%) males, and 22 (41.5%) females] completed 114 evaluations as follows: 43 assessments (37.7%) by PGY1, 38 (33.3%) by PGY2, 14 (12.3%) by PGY3, 12 (10.5%) by PGY4, and 7 (6.1%) by PGY5. Residents' feedback was positive, with all assessed areas receiving favorable grading (i.e., excellent/good), with 93% for Tasks for Training Level, 92.1% for Degree of Difficulty for Training Level, 90.4% for Preparation, 97.4% for Setting, and 93% Guidance). Less than 10% of the assessed area received marginal scores by PGY1 and PGY2. Animal labs were highly desired by senior residents (Table 1).

Conclusion: Animal laboratories are highly desired by residents and provide unique opportunities to perform advanced/complex procedures, similar to OR environment, but importantly, in a safe setting before operating on humans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信