Ada H Tsoi, Gary Gartner, Steven W Cotten, John Kim, John Nazarian, Joseph Thomas, Steven David McSwain, Rachini Ahmadi-Moosavi, Ram Rimal
{"title":"建立和实施负责任的人工智能框架:1年回顾。","authors":"Ada H Tsoi, Gary Gartner, Steven W Cotten, John Kim, John Nazarian, Joseph Thomas, Steven David McSwain, Rachini Ahmadi-Moosavi, Ram Rimal","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocaf147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This work highlights successes and challenges of implementing a novel responsible artificial intelligence (RAI) framework, emphasizing healthcare disciplines needed to operationalize it.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>UNC Health developed an RAI framework to assess artificial intelligence (AI) solutions, featuring a 21-question intake survey aligned with institutional goals to promote fairness, transparency, accountability, and trustworthiness, and evaluated by clinical, analytical, and operational experts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve survey evaluations revealed low fairness scores and resulted in 83% conditional approvals.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Learnings included the importance of representative training datasets, systematic evaluation of vendor-provided models, and robust post-implementation monitoring. Challenges included the infrequency of analyses stratified by demographics, limited vendor transparency, and reliance on volunteer engagement for survey evaluations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our framework provides a roadmap to assess AI tools in healthcare but requires overcoming implementation barriers like resource constraints and vendor cooperation. Future iterations should consider tiered evaluations based on risk likelihood and member engagement for scalability.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing and implementing a responsible artificial intelligence framework: a 1-year review.\",\"authors\":\"Ada H Tsoi, Gary Gartner, Steven W Cotten, John Kim, John Nazarian, Joseph Thomas, Steven David McSwain, Rachini Ahmadi-Moosavi, Ram Rimal\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamia/ocaf147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This work highlights successes and challenges of implementing a novel responsible artificial intelligence (RAI) framework, emphasizing healthcare disciplines needed to operationalize it.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>UNC Health developed an RAI framework to assess artificial intelligence (AI) solutions, featuring a 21-question intake survey aligned with institutional goals to promote fairness, transparency, accountability, and trustworthiness, and evaluated by clinical, analytical, and operational experts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve survey evaluations revealed low fairness scores and resulted in 83% conditional approvals.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Learnings included the importance of representative training datasets, systematic evaluation of vendor-provided models, and robust post-implementation monitoring. Challenges included the infrequency of analyses stratified by demographics, limited vendor transparency, and reliance on volunteer engagement for survey evaluations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our framework provides a roadmap to assess AI tools in healthcare but requires overcoming implementation barriers like resource constraints and vendor cooperation. Future iterations should consider tiered evaluations based on risk likelihood and member engagement for scalability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf147\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf147","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Establishing and implementing a responsible artificial intelligence framework: a 1-year review.
Objective: This work highlights successes and challenges of implementing a novel responsible artificial intelligence (RAI) framework, emphasizing healthcare disciplines needed to operationalize it.
Materials and methods: UNC Health developed an RAI framework to assess artificial intelligence (AI) solutions, featuring a 21-question intake survey aligned with institutional goals to promote fairness, transparency, accountability, and trustworthiness, and evaluated by clinical, analytical, and operational experts.
Results: Twelve survey evaluations revealed low fairness scores and resulted in 83% conditional approvals.
Discussion: Learnings included the importance of representative training datasets, systematic evaluation of vendor-provided models, and robust post-implementation monitoring. Challenges included the infrequency of analyses stratified by demographics, limited vendor transparency, and reliance on volunteer engagement for survey evaluations.
Conclusions: Our framework provides a roadmap to assess AI tools in healthcare but requires overcoming implementation barriers like resource constraints and vendor cooperation. Future iterations should consider tiered evaluations based on risk likelihood and member engagement for scalability.
期刊介绍:
JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.