建立和实施负责任的人工智能框架:1年回顾。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Ada H Tsoi, Gary Gartner, Steven W Cotten, John Kim, John Nazarian, Joseph Thomas, Steven David McSwain, Rachini Ahmadi-Moosavi, Ram Rimal
{"title":"建立和实施负责任的人工智能框架:1年回顾。","authors":"Ada H Tsoi, Gary Gartner, Steven W Cotten, John Kim, John Nazarian, Joseph Thomas, Steven David McSwain, Rachini Ahmadi-Moosavi, Ram Rimal","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocaf147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This work highlights successes and challenges of implementing a novel responsible artificial intelligence (RAI) framework, emphasizing healthcare disciplines needed to operationalize it.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>UNC Health developed an RAI framework to assess artificial intelligence (AI) solutions, featuring a 21-question intake survey aligned with institutional goals to promote fairness, transparency, accountability, and trustworthiness, and evaluated by clinical, analytical, and operational experts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve survey evaluations revealed low fairness scores and resulted in 83% conditional approvals.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Learnings included the importance of representative training datasets, systematic evaluation of vendor-provided models, and robust post-implementation monitoring. Challenges included the infrequency of analyses stratified by demographics, limited vendor transparency, and reliance on volunteer engagement for survey evaluations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our framework provides a roadmap to assess AI tools in healthcare but requires overcoming implementation barriers like resource constraints and vendor cooperation. Future iterations should consider tiered evaluations based on risk likelihood and member engagement for scalability.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing and implementing a responsible artificial intelligence framework: a 1-year review.\",\"authors\":\"Ada H Tsoi, Gary Gartner, Steven W Cotten, John Kim, John Nazarian, Joseph Thomas, Steven David McSwain, Rachini Ahmadi-Moosavi, Ram Rimal\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamia/ocaf147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This work highlights successes and challenges of implementing a novel responsible artificial intelligence (RAI) framework, emphasizing healthcare disciplines needed to operationalize it.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>UNC Health developed an RAI framework to assess artificial intelligence (AI) solutions, featuring a 21-question intake survey aligned with institutional goals to promote fairness, transparency, accountability, and trustworthiness, and evaluated by clinical, analytical, and operational experts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve survey evaluations revealed low fairness scores and resulted in 83% conditional approvals.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Learnings included the importance of representative training datasets, systematic evaluation of vendor-provided models, and robust post-implementation monitoring. Challenges included the infrequency of analyses stratified by demographics, limited vendor transparency, and reliance on volunteer engagement for survey evaluations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our framework provides a roadmap to assess AI tools in healthcare but requires overcoming implementation barriers like resource constraints and vendor cooperation. Future iterations should consider tiered evaluations based on risk likelihood and member engagement for scalability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf147\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf147","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本工作强调了实施新型负责任人工智能(RAI)框架的成功和挑战,强调了实施该框架所需的医疗保健学科。材料和方法:北卡罗来纳大学健康中心开发了一个评估人工智能(AI)解决方案的RAI框架,其中包括21个问题的调查,与促进公平、透明度、问责制和可信度的机构目标一致,并由临床、分析和运营专家进行评估。结果:12项调查评估显示公平得分低,导致83%的有条件批准。讨论:学习包括代表性训练数据集的重要性,对供应商提供的模型的系统评估,以及健壮的实施后监测。挑战包括根据人口统计数据分层的分析频率低,供应商透明度有限,以及对志愿者参与调查评估的依赖。结论:我们的框架提供了评估医疗保健领域人工智能工具的路线图,但需要克服资源限制和供应商合作等实施障碍。未来的迭代应该考虑基于风险可能性和可伸缩性成员参与的分层评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishing and implementing a responsible artificial intelligence framework: a 1-year review.

Objective: This work highlights successes and challenges of implementing a novel responsible artificial intelligence (RAI) framework, emphasizing healthcare disciplines needed to operationalize it.

Materials and methods: UNC Health developed an RAI framework to assess artificial intelligence (AI) solutions, featuring a 21-question intake survey aligned with institutional goals to promote fairness, transparency, accountability, and trustworthiness, and evaluated by clinical, analytical, and operational experts.

Results: Twelve survey evaluations revealed low fairness scores and resulted in 83% conditional approvals.

Discussion: Learnings included the importance of representative training datasets, systematic evaluation of vendor-provided models, and robust post-implementation monitoring. Challenges included the infrequency of analyses stratified by demographics, limited vendor transparency, and reliance on volunteer engagement for survey evaluations.

Conclusions: Our framework provides a roadmap to assess AI tools in healthcare but requires overcoming implementation barriers like resource constraints and vendor cooperation. Future iterations should consider tiered evaluations based on risk likelihood and member engagement for scalability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信