免疫检查点抑制剂在癌症合并糖尿病患者中的不良事件:FDA不良事件报告系统数据库的真实世界药物警戒分析(2011-2025)。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Control Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-19 DOI:10.1177/10732748251381428
Minxia Yang, Di Qiu, Minguang Huang, Shengjian Yu, Feng Xuan
{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂在癌症合并糖尿病患者中的不良事件:FDA不良事件报告系统数据库的真实世界药物警戒分析(2011-2025)。","authors":"Minxia Yang, Di Qiu, Minguang Huang, Shengjian Yu, Feng Xuan","doi":"10.1177/10732748251381428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have redefined cancer therapeutics. However, they may provoke immune-related adverse events (irAEs), with diabetes potentially altering their patterns. We aimed to investigate whether diabetic cancer patients exhibit a distinctive or intensified irAE pattern.MethodsWe performed a real-world, retrospective pharmacovigilance study of ICIs using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System from 2011 to 2025. Reports listing anti-PD-1 (Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Cemiplimab), anti-PD-L1 (Atezolizumab, Avelumab, Durvalumab), and anti-CTLA-4 (Ipilimumab, Tremelimumab) agents as suspected drugs were extracted. Disproportionality signals were identified with 4 algorithms: Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network, Reporting Odds Ratio, Proportional Reporting Ratio, and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker. Time-to-onset was calculated from therapy start to event date, modelled with Weibull distributions, and compared across subgroups with non-parametric tests.ResultsOf 22,775,812 FAERS reports, 1886 involved ICIs used in cancer patients with comorbid diabetes. 423 (22.4 %) were fatal and 1463 (77.6 %) non-fatal. Men predominated (71.5 %), and 63.0 % of patients were aged 65-85 years. Combination therapy (anti-CTLA-4 plus PD-1 or PD-L1) accounted for the highest death proportion (29.6 %). Disproportionality analysis revealed the strongest preferred-term signals for pneumonitis/interstitial lung disease, hypothyroidism, and colitis among all diabetic cancer patients receiving ICI therapy. At the system-organ-class level, endocrine, hepatobiliary, and blood/lymphatic disorders showed the most consistent risk across agents. Weibull modelling demonstrated an early-failure pattern (shape β < 1) with a median time-to-onset of 126.6 days overall, shortening to 90.9 days with combination therapy. Fatal subgroup occurred sooner than non-fatal subgroup (median 106.7 vs 132.5 days; <i>P</i> = 0.004).ConclusionDiabetic cancer patients experienced the full spectrum of ICI-associated toxicities, with combination treatments linked to greater lethality. Multidisciplinary surveillance during the first 3-4 months of therapy, glycemic control, and long-term follow-up may be essential to optimize benefit and minimize harm in this expanding population.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"32 ","pages":"10732748251381428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449653/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Patients with Comorbid Diabetes: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database (2011-2025).\",\"authors\":\"Minxia Yang, Di Qiu, Minguang Huang, Shengjian Yu, Feng Xuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10732748251381428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>IntroductionImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have redefined cancer therapeutics. However, they may provoke immune-related adverse events (irAEs), with diabetes potentially altering their patterns. We aimed to investigate whether diabetic cancer patients exhibit a distinctive or intensified irAE pattern.MethodsWe performed a real-world, retrospective pharmacovigilance study of ICIs using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System from 2011 to 2025. Reports listing anti-PD-1 (Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Cemiplimab), anti-PD-L1 (Atezolizumab, Avelumab, Durvalumab), and anti-CTLA-4 (Ipilimumab, Tremelimumab) agents as suspected drugs were extracted. Disproportionality signals were identified with 4 algorithms: Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network, Reporting Odds Ratio, Proportional Reporting Ratio, and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker. Time-to-onset was calculated from therapy start to event date, modelled with Weibull distributions, and compared across subgroups with non-parametric tests.ResultsOf 22,775,812 FAERS reports, 1886 involved ICIs used in cancer patients with comorbid diabetes. 423 (22.4 %) were fatal and 1463 (77.6 %) non-fatal. Men predominated (71.5 %), and 63.0 % of patients were aged 65-85 years. Combination therapy (anti-CTLA-4 plus PD-1 or PD-L1) accounted for the highest death proportion (29.6 %). Disproportionality analysis revealed the strongest preferred-term signals for pneumonitis/interstitial lung disease, hypothyroidism, and colitis among all diabetic cancer patients receiving ICI therapy. At the system-organ-class level, endocrine, hepatobiliary, and blood/lymphatic disorders showed the most consistent risk across agents. Weibull modelling demonstrated an early-failure pattern (shape β < 1) with a median time-to-onset of 126.6 days overall, shortening to 90.9 days with combination therapy. Fatal subgroup occurred sooner than non-fatal subgroup (median 106.7 vs 132.5 days; <i>P</i> = 0.004).ConclusionDiabetic cancer patients experienced the full spectrum of ICI-associated toxicities, with combination treatments linked to greater lethality. Multidisciplinary surveillance during the first 3-4 months of therapy, glycemic control, and long-term follow-up may be essential to optimize benefit and minimize harm in this expanding population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Control\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"10732748251381428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449653/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748251381428\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748251381428","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)重新定义了癌症治疗方法。然而,它们可能引发免疫相关不良事件(irae),糖尿病可能会改变它们的模式。我们的目的是研究糖尿病癌症患者是否表现出独特的或强化的irAE模式。方法:我们使用FDA不良事件报告系统对2011年至2025年的ICIs进行了一项现实世界的回顾性药物警戒研究。将抗pd -1 (Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Cemiplimab),抗pd - l1 (Atezolizumab, Avelumab, Durvalumab)和抗ctla -4 (Ipilimumab, Tremelimumab)药物列为可疑药物的报告被提取。采用贝叶斯置信传播神经网络、报告优势比、比例报告比和多项目伽玛泊松收缩法4种算法对歧化信号进行识别。从治疗开始到事件发生日期计算发病时间,用威布尔分布建模,并通过非参数检验进行跨亚组比较。结果在22,775,812例FAERS报告中,有1886例涉及合并糖尿病的癌症患者使用ICIs。死亡423例(22.4%),非死亡1463例(77.6%)。男性居多(71.5%),63.0%的患者年龄在65-85岁之间。联合治疗(抗ctla -4 + PD-1或PD-L1)的死亡率最高(29.6%)。歧化分析显示,在所有接受ICI治疗的糖尿病癌症患者中,肺炎/间质性肺疾病、甲状腺功能减退和结肠炎的首选术语信号最强。在系统器官级别上,内分泌、肝胆和血液/淋巴疾病显示出最一致的风险。Weibull模型显示早期衰竭模式(形状β < 1),总体中位发病时间为126.6天,联合治疗缩短至90.9天。致死性亚组发生早于非致死性亚组(中位106.7天vs 132.5天;P = 0.004)。结论糖尿病癌症患者经历了ici相关的全谱毒性,联合治疗具有更高的致死率。在治疗的前3-4个月进行多学科监测、血糖控制和长期随访可能对这一不断扩大的人群的获益最大化和危害最小化至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Patients with Comorbid Diabetes: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database (2011-2025).

IntroductionImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have redefined cancer therapeutics. However, they may provoke immune-related adverse events (irAEs), with diabetes potentially altering their patterns. We aimed to investigate whether diabetic cancer patients exhibit a distinctive or intensified irAE pattern.MethodsWe performed a real-world, retrospective pharmacovigilance study of ICIs using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System from 2011 to 2025. Reports listing anti-PD-1 (Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Cemiplimab), anti-PD-L1 (Atezolizumab, Avelumab, Durvalumab), and anti-CTLA-4 (Ipilimumab, Tremelimumab) agents as suspected drugs were extracted. Disproportionality signals were identified with 4 algorithms: Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network, Reporting Odds Ratio, Proportional Reporting Ratio, and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker. Time-to-onset was calculated from therapy start to event date, modelled with Weibull distributions, and compared across subgroups with non-parametric tests.ResultsOf 22,775,812 FAERS reports, 1886 involved ICIs used in cancer patients with comorbid diabetes. 423 (22.4 %) were fatal and 1463 (77.6 %) non-fatal. Men predominated (71.5 %), and 63.0 % of patients were aged 65-85 years. Combination therapy (anti-CTLA-4 plus PD-1 or PD-L1) accounted for the highest death proportion (29.6 %). Disproportionality analysis revealed the strongest preferred-term signals for pneumonitis/interstitial lung disease, hypothyroidism, and colitis among all diabetic cancer patients receiving ICI therapy. At the system-organ-class level, endocrine, hepatobiliary, and blood/lymphatic disorders showed the most consistent risk across agents. Weibull modelling demonstrated an early-failure pattern (shape β < 1) with a median time-to-onset of 126.6 days overall, shortening to 90.9 days with combination therapy. Fatal subgroup occurred sooner than non-fatal subgroup (median 106.7 vs 132.5 days; P = 0.004).ConclusionDiabetic cancer patients experienced the full spectrum of ICI-associated toxicities, with combination treatments linked to greater lethality. Multidisciplinary surveillance during the first 3-4 months of therapy, glycemic control, and long-term follow-up may be essential to optimize benefit and minimize harm in this expanding population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Control
Cancer Control ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Control is a JCR-ranked, peer-reviewed open access journal whose mission is to advance the prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment, and palliative care of cancer by enabling researchers, doctors, policymakers, and other healthcare professionals to freely share research along the cancer control continuum. Our vision is a world where gold-standard cancer care is the norm, not the exception.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信