Implementation of a Virtual Hospital in the Home Service for Patients With COVID-19 in Queensland, Australia: Mixed Methods Evaluation Using the RE-AIM Framework.

Background: Hospital in the home (HITH) provides home-based care as an alternative to traditional hospitalization. In response to the COVID-19 Omicron wave, a public hospital in the rural Western portion of Southeast Queensland implemented a virtual HITH service to support adults, maternity patients, and children with moderate COVID-19 symptoms and additional health concerns. Although the pandemic accelerated the uptake of virtual care within HITH models, existing literature has focused on clinical outcomes, with limited evidence on key implementation outcomes.

Objective: Using the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) framework, this study evaluated the implementation of the virtual COVID-19 HITH service and identified factors influencing its implementation, to inform ongoing service development and support potential scaling of this model of care.

Methods: The RE-AIM implementation science framework was selected to guide the evaluation, capturing both clinical and contextual dimensions of implementation at both individual and organizational levels. Quantitative data on service usage and costs were retrospectively extracted from electronic medical records and finance records, while patient experience data were drawn from patient-reported experience measures surveys. Qualitative data were collected through one-on-one interviews with patients and staff. All data sources were analyzed separately and then triangulated within the RE-AIM framework to understand what occurred, how, and why.

Results: The service admitted 3192 patients, most of whom were female (2027/3192, 63.5%), English-speaking (3140/3192, 98.4%), and residing in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas (1879/3192, 58.9%) (reach). The model was feasible and safe to implement, managing 3240 admissions with no reported deaths. Patients valued continuous access to care and described better recovery experiences at home (effectiveness). Staff viewed the model as appropriate for identifying and managing high-risk patients in the community, easing pressure on hospital beds (adoption). The service cost Aus $ 5.4 million (US $3.5 million) over 11 months. Implementation barriers included the urgency of the pandemic scenario, limited infrastructure and human resources, and changing requirements in relation to COVID-19. These were mitigated by several people factors that were critical to its successful implementation, including a consultant-led structure, staff commitment, and adaptability (implementation). The service saved 16,651 inpatient bed days before being integrated into core HITH operations. The experience strengthened staff capabilities in emergency response, virtual care delivery, and strategic planning. The model shows promise for broader application into pediatric care, though further work is needed to enhance interdepartmental collaboration and staff recognition (maintenance).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a virtual HITH model can be implemented effectively and safely at scale. Findings support its potential for integration into routine care, provided that adequate resource planning, a skilled and multidisciplinary workforce, well-defined care pathways, and equity-focused strategies are in place.