评估接受远程急救护理的种族和族裔差异。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jessica Faiz, Joy Toyama, Anita H Yuan, Nicholas Jackson, Neil Patel, Lisa Zhao, Anita A Vashi, Patricia Fermin, Donna L Washington, Kristina M Cordasco
{"title":"评估接受远程急救护理的种族和族裔差异。","authors":"Jessica Faiz, Joy Toyama, Anita H Yuan, Nicholas Jackson, Neil Patel, Lisa Zhao, Anita A Vashi, Patricia Fermin, Donna L Washington, Kristina M Cordasco","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2021, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) initiated a Tele-Emergency Care (TEC) program, where care is provided through phone or video by an emergency medicine provider to Veterans with urgent, unscheduled medical concerns. Early data suggest TEC effectively resolves Veterans' care concerns and decreases low-value emergency department visits. Equity of TEC receipt has yet to be assessed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess differences, by race and ethnicity, of Veterans' receipt of TEC.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Veterans who used TEC and/or low-acuity in-person VA emergency care in Southern California, Arizona, and New Mexico, from March 1, 2021 to May 1, 2023.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>TEC and/or low-acuity in-person VA care use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Veterans who only had TEC visits were less likely than those who only had in-person visits to be of racial and ethnic minority groups, namely Asian (1.38% vs. 3.54%, P<0.001), Black (12.2% vs. 18.1%, P<0.001), and Hispanic (15.7 vs. 19.1%, P<0.001). These findings persisted once adjusting for covariates; having only TEC visits was less likely than only having in-person care for Veterans who were Asian [relative risk (RR): 0.47, P<0.001], Black (RR: 0.61, P<0.001) or Hispanic (RR: 0.87, P<0.001), compared with White Veterans.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Receipt of TEC, or both TEC and in-person care, rather than exclusively in-person care, is lower among Asian, Black, and Hispanic Veterans compared with White Veterans, independent of covariates. To promote equity, future work should determine and address root causes of disparities, including digital device access, triage processes, and Veteran experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Receipt of Tele-Emergency Care.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Faiz, Joy Toyama, Anita H Yuan, Nicholas Jackson, Neil Patel, Lisa Zhao, Anita A Vashi, Patricia Fermin, Donna L Washington, Kristina M Cordasco\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2021, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) initiated a Tele-Emergency Care (TEC) program, where care is provided through phone or video by an emergency medicine provider to Veterans with urgent, unscheduled medical concerns. Early data suggest TEC effectively resolves Veterans' care concerns and decreases low-value emergency department visits. Equity of TEC receipt has yet to be assessed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess differences, by race and ethnicity, of Veterans' receipt of TEC.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Veterans who used TEC and/or low-acuity in-person VA emergency care in Southern California, Arizona, and New Mexico, from March 1, 2021 to May 1, 2023.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>TEC and/or low-acuity in-person VA care use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Veterans who only had TEC visits were less likely than those who only had in-person visits to be of racial and ethnic minority groups, namely Asian (1.38% vs. 3.54%, P<0.001), Black (12.2% vs. 18.1%, P<0.001), and Hispanic (15.7 vs. 19.1%, P<0.001). These findings persisted once adjusting for covariates; having only TEC visits was less likely than only having in-person care for Veterans who were Asian [relative risk (RR): 0.47, P<0.001], Black (RR: 0.61, P<0.001) or Hispanic (RR: 0.87, P<0.001), compared with White Veterans.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Receipt of TEC, or both TEC and in-person care, rather than exclusively in-person care, is lower among Asian, Black, and Hispanic Veterans compared with White Veterans, independent of covariates. To promote equity, future work should determine and address root causes of disparities, including digital device access, triage processes, and Veteran experiences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002207\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2021年,退伍军人健康管理局(VA)启动了远程紧急护理(TEC)计划,由急诊医疗提供者通过电话或视频向有紧急、计划外医疗问题的退伍军人提供护理。早期数据表明,TEC有效地解决了退伍军人的护理问题,减少了低价值的急诊就诊。技术过渡时期收入的净值还有待评估。目的:评估不同种族和民族的退伍军人接受TEC的差异。研究设计:横断面研究。研究对象:在2021年3月1日至2023年5月1日期间,在南加州、亚利桑那州和新墨西哥州接受TEC和/或低视敏度VA紧急护理的退伍军人。测量:TEC和/或低视敏度的VA护理使用情况。结果:仅接受TEC访问的退伍军人比仅接受面对面访问的退伍军人更不可能是少数种族和族裔群体,即亚洲人(1.38% vs. 3.54%)。结论:与白人退伍军人相比,亚洲、黑人和西班牙裔退伍军人接受TEC或TEC和面对面护理,而不是完全面对面护理的比例更低。为了促进公平,未来的工作应该确定和解决不平等的根本原因,包括数字设备访问、分流流程和退伍军人经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Receipt of Tele-Emergency Care.

Background: In 2021, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) initiated a Tele-Emergency Care (TEC) program, where care is provided through phone or video by an emergency medicine provider to Veterans with urgent, unscheduled medical concerns. Early data suggest TEC effectively resolves Veterans' care concerns and decreases low-value emergency department visits. Equity of TEC receipt has yet to be assessed.

Objective: To assess differences, by race and ethnicity, of Veterans' receipt of TEC.

Research design: Cross-sectional study.

Subjects: Veterans who used TEC and/or low-acuity in-person VA emergency care in Southern California, Arizona, and New Mexico, from March 1, 2021 to May 1, 2023.

Measures: TEC and/or low-acuity in-person VA care use.

Results: Veterans who only had TEC visits were less likely than those who only had in-person visits to be of racial and ethnic minority groups, namely Asian (1.38% vs. 3.54%, P<0.001), Black (12.2% vs. 18.1%, P<0.001), and Hispanic (15.7 vs. 19.1%, P<0.001). These findings persisted once adjusting for covariates; having only TEC visits was less likely than only having in-person care for Veterans who were Asian [relative risk (RR): 0.47, P<0.001], Black (RR: 0.61, P<0.001) or Hispanic (RR: 0.87, P<0.001), compared with White Veterans.

Conclusions: Receipt of TEC, or both TEC and in-person care, rather than exclusively in-person care, is lower among Asian, Black, and Hispanic Veterans compared with White Veterans, independent of covariates. To promote equity, future work should determine and address root causes of disparities, including digital device access, triage processes, and Veteran experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信