Tjep Hoedemakers, Eline S van Hattum, Bart-Jeroen Petri, Gert J de Borst
{"title":"上肢血栓形成综合征评分:来自国际德尔菲研究的一致结果。","authors":"Tjep Hoedemakers, Eline S van Hattum, Bart-Jeroen Petri, Gert J de Borst","doi":"10.1016/j.jtha.2025.08.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There is no gold standard to diagnose or classify UE-PTS. Recently, two Delphi consensus studies were conducted to develop a score to diagnose and classify UE-PTS. The aim of the present study was to gain expert consensus on the definitions of the individual components of the UE-PTS score to enable a consistent application of this score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Delphi approach was chosen as the appropriate method to gain expert consensus, and 53 experts were invited to participate. Definitions were collaboratively developed by a Delphi steering committee together with UE-PTS patients. Experts were asked to provide feedback and rated the proposed definitions across three Delphi rounds using a 9-point Likert scale, with consensus defined as ≥75% of scores at 7 or above.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>35 of the 53 (66%) experts agreed to participate in this Delphi study. The expert panel included vascular surgeons, internists, haematologists, and physical therapists. In round 1, 45 alternative definitions or comments were collected. In round 2, no consensus was reached for any statement. In round 3, consensus was reached for all statements, with the highest level of consensus of 96% for the symptoms: heavy feeling of the arm, fatigue when using arm, and pain (chronic or during specific exercises).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consensus was reached on the optimal definitions of five symptoms and two clinical signs of the UE-PTS score. The next step is to validate and finalize the UE-PTS score in a patient cohort before it can be implemented in future research and clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":17326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Upper Extremity Post Thrombotic Syndrome Score: Consensus results from an international Delphi study.\",\"authors\":\"Tjep Hoedemakers, Eline S van Hattum, Bart-Jeroen Petri, Gert J de Borst\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtha.2025.08.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There is no gold standard to diagnose or classify UE-PTS. Recently, two Delphi consensus studies were conducted to develop a score to diagnose and classify UE-PTS. The aim of the present study was to gain expert consensus on the definitions of the individual components of the UE-PTS score to enable a consistent application of this score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Delphi approach was chosen as the appropriate method to gain expert consensus, and 53 experts were invited to participate. Definitions were collaboratively developed by a Delphi steering committee together with UE-PTS patients. Experts were asked to provide feedback and rated the proposed definitions across three Delphi rounds using a 9-point Likert scale, with consensus defined as ≥75% of scores at 7 or above.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>35 of the 53 (66%) experts agreed to participate in this Delphi study. The expert panel included vascular surgeons, internists, haematologists, and physical therapists. In round 1, 45 alternative definitions or comments were collected. In round 2, no consensus was reached for any statement. In round 3, consensus was reached for all statements, with the highest level of consensus of 96% for the symptoms: heavy feeling of the arm, fatigue when using arm, and pain (chronic or during specific exercises).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consensus was reached on the optimal definitions of five symptoms and two clinical signs of the UE-PTS score. The next step is to validate and finalize the UE-PTS score in a patient cohort before it can be implemented in future research and clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2025.08.026\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2025.08.026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Upper Extremity Post Thrombotic Syndrome Score: Consensus results from an international Delphi study.
Objectives: There is no gold standard to diagnose or classify UE-PTS. Recently, two Delphi consensus studies were conducted to develop a score to diagnose and classify UE-PTS. The aim of the present study was to gain expert consensus on the definitions of the individual components of the UE-PTS score to enable a consistent application of this score.
Methods: The Delphi approach was chosen as the appropriate method to gain expert consensus, and 53 experts were invited to participate. Definitions were collaboratively developed by a Delphi steering committee together with UE-PTS patients. Experts were asked to provide feedback and rated the proposed definitions across three Delphi rounds using a 9-point Likert scale, with consensus defined as ≥75% of scores at 7 or above.
Results: 35 of the 53 (66%) experts agreed to participate in this Delphi study. The expert panel included vascular surgeons, internists, haematologists, and physical therapists. In round 1, 45 alternative definitions or comments were collected. In round 2, no consensus was reached for any statement. In round 3, consensus was reached for all statements, with the highest level of consensus of 96% for the symptoms: heavy feeling of the arm, fatigue when using arm, and pain (chronic or during specific exercises).
Conclusion: Consensus was reached on the optimal definitions of five symptoms and two clinical signs of the UE-PTS score. The next step is to validate and finalize the UE-PTS score in a patient cohort before it can be implemented in future research and clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (JTH) serves as the official journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. It is dedicated to advancing science related to thrombosis, bleeding disorders, and vascular biology through the dissemination and exchange of information and ideas within the global research community.
Types of Publications:
The journal publishes a variety of content, including:
Original research reports
State-of-the-art reviews
Brief reports
Case reports
Invited commentaries on publications in the Journal
Forum articles
Correspondence
Announcements
Scope of Contributions:
Editors invite contributions from both fundamental and clinical domains. These include:
Basic manuscripts on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis
Studies on proteins and reactions related to thrombosis and haemostasis
Research on blood platelets and their interactions with other biological systems, such as the vessel wall, blood cells, and invading organisms
Clinical manuscripts covering various topics including venous thrombosis, arterial disease, hemophilia, bleeding disorders, and platelet diseases
Clinical manuscripts may encompass etiology, diagnostics, prognosis, prevention, and treatment strategies.