RB1基因改变对转移性前列腺癌预后的影响

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-19 DOI:10.1200/PO-25-00341
Ruben Raychaudhuri, Isla P Garraway, Kara N Maxwell, Matt Rettig, Heena Desai, Martin W Schoen, Michael T Schweizer, Himisha Beltran, Peter S Nelson, Bruce Montgomery
{"title":"RB1基因改变对转移性前列腺癌预后的影响","authors":"Ruben Raychaudhuri, Isla P Garraway, Kara N Maxwell, Matt Rettig, Heena Desai, Martin W Schoen, Michael T Schweizer, Himisha Beltran, Peter S Nelson, Bruce Montgomery","doi":"10.1200/PO-25-00341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Emerging evidence suggests that <i>RB1</i> inactivation may be a strong predictor of poor survival for men with prostate cancer (PC); however, large-scale validation is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed whether <i>RB1</i> alterations are associated with inferior survival in advanced PC and evaluated the impact of co-occurring genomic alterations on outcomes using retrospective data from the Veteran's Health Administration and Veterans Affairs Multi-Omics Analysis Platform for Prostate Cancer from 2016 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) from onset of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), as well as OS from initiation of life-prolonging therapy other than androgen deprivation therapy, and time to development of mCRPC. Eighty-seven (3.5%) of the 2,512 included patients had an <i>RB1</i> alteration detected. The median age at diagnosis in the <i>RB1</i>-altered group was 71 (IQR, 65-76) years, and 68 (IQR, 62-73) years in the <i>RB1</i> wild-type group. The median overall survival from diagnosis of mCRPC was 1.31 years (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.84) in those with an <i>RB1</i> alteration compared with 2.99 years (95% CI, 2.79 to 3.23). <i>RB1</i> alteration alone conferred similar poor prognosis when compared with patients who had combined <i>PTEN</i> and <i>TP53</i> alterations. A dose effect was seen with increasing numbers of tumor suppressor genes (TSGs-<i>RB1</i>, <i>TP53</i>, and <i>PTEN</i>) conferring poorer outcomes. The median survival of patients from diagnosis of mCRPC with zero, one, two, and three TSGs was 3.74, 2.61, 1.61, and 0.87 years, respectively. <i>BRCA2</i> alterations were not associated with significantly worse outcomes unless accompanied by <i>RB1</i> alteration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this large, real-world cohort of men with mCRPC, <i>RB1</i> alterations emerged as a strong indicator of poor prognosis and can be used to stratify studies alone or in conjunction with other TSG alterations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2500341"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Significance of <i>RB1</i> Alterations on Outcomes in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Ruben Raychaudhuri, Isla P Garraway, Kara N Maxwell, Matt Rettig, Heena Desai, Martin W Schoen, Michael T Schweizer, Himisha Beltran, Peter S Nelson, Bruce Montgomery\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/PO-25-00341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Emerging evidence suggests that <i>RB1</i> inactivation may be a strong predictor of poor survival for men with prostate cancer (PC); however, large-scale validation is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed whether <i>RB1</i> alterations are associated with inferior survival in advanced PC and evaluated the impact of co-occurring genomic alterations on outcomes using retrospective data from the Veteran's Health Administration and Veterans Affairs Multi-Omics Analysis Platform for Prostate Cancer from 2016 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) from onset of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), as well as OS from initiation of life-prolonging therapy other than androgen deprivation therapy, and time to development of mCRPC. Eighty-seven (3.5%) of the 2,512 included patients had an <i>RB1</i> alteration detected. The median age at diagnosis in the <i>RB1</i>-altered group was 71 (IQR, 65-76) years, and 68 (IQR, 62-73) years in the <i>RB1</i> wild-type group. The median overall survival from diagnosis of mCRPC was 1.31 years (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.84) in those with an <i>RB1</i> alteration compared with 2.99 years (95% CI, 2.79 to 3.23). <i>RB1</i> alteration alone conferred similar poor prognosis when compared with patients who had combined <i>PTEN</i> and <i>TP53</i> alterations. A dose effect was seen with increasing numbers of tumor suppressor genes (TSGs-<i>RB1</i>, <i>TP53</i>, and <i>PTEN</i>) conferring poorer outcomes. The median survival of patients from diagnosis of mCRPC with zero, one, two, and three TSGs was 3.74, 2.61, 1.61, and 0.87 years, respectively. <i>BRCA2</i> alterations were not associated with significantly worse outcomes unless accompanied by <i>RB1</i> alteration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this large, real-world cohort of men with mCRPC, <i>RB1</i> alterations emerged as a strong indicator of poor prognosis and can be used to stratify studies alone or in conjunction with other TSG alterations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"e2500341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453595/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-25-00341\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-25-00341","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:新出现的证据表明,RB1失活可能是前列腺癌(PC)患者生存不良的一个强有力的预测因素;然而,大规模验证是缺乏的。方法:我们分析了RB1改变是否与晚期PC患者的低生存率相关,并评估了共同发生的基因组改变对预后的影响,使用了2016年至2023年退伍军人健康管理局和退伍军人事务前列腺癌多组学分析平台的回顾性数据。结果:主要结局是转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)发病后的总生存期(OS),以及开始非雄激素剥夺治疗的延长生命治疗的OS,以及到mCRPC发展的时间。在2512例纳入的患者中,有87例(3.5%)检测到RB1改变。RB1改变组诊断时的中位年龄为71 (IQR, 65-76)岁,RB1野生型组为68 (IQR, 62-73)岁。RB1基因改变患者自诊断为mCRPC后的中位总生存期为1.31年(95% CI, 0.89 - 1.84),而RB1基因改变患者的中位总生存期为2.99年(95% CI, 2.79 - 3.23)。与合并PTEN和TP53改变的患者相比,单独RB1改变会导致类似的不良预后。随着肿瘤抑制基因(TSGs-RB1、TP53和PTEN)数量的增加,剂量效应导致预后较差。诊断为mCRPC的患者中位生存期分别为3.74年、2.61年、1.61年和0.87年。除非伴有RB1改变,否则BRCA2改变与显著较差的结果无关。结论:在这个庞大的、真实的mCRPC男性队列中,RB1改变成为预后不良的一个强有力的指标,可用于单独或与其他TSG改变联合进行分层研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic Significance of RB1 Alterations on Outcomes in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Purpose: Emerging evidence suggests that RB1 inactivation may be a strong predictor of poor survival for men with prostate cancer (PC); however, large-scale validation is lacking.

Methods: We analyzed whether RB1 alterations are associated with inferior survival in advanced PC and evaluated the impact of co-occurring genomic alterations on outcomes using retrospective data from the Veteran's Health Administration and Veterans Affairs Multi-Omics Analysis Platform for Prostate Cancer from 2016 to 2023.

Results: The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) from onset of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), as well as OS from initiation of life-prolonging therapy other than androgen deprivation therapy, and time to development of mCRPC. Eighty-seven (3.5%) of the 2,512 included patients had an RB1 alteration detected. The median age at diagnosis in the RB1-altered group was 71 (IQR, 65-76) years, and 68 (IQR, 62-73) years in the RB1 wild-type group. The median overall survival from diagnosis of mCRPC was 1.31 years (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.84) in those with an RB1 alteration compared with 2.99 years (95% CI, 2.79 to 3.23). RB1 alteration alone conferred similar poor prognosis when compared with patients who had combined PTEN and TP53 alterations. A dose effect was seen with increasing numbers of tumor suppressor genes (TSGs-RB1, TP53, and PTEN) conferring poorer outcomes. The median survival of patients from diagnosis of mCRPC with zero, one, two, and three TSGs was 3.74, 2.61, 1.61, and 0.87 years, respectively. BRCA2 alterations were not associated with significantly worse outcomes unless accompanied by RB1 alteration.

Conclusion: In this large, real-world cohort of men with mCRPC, RB1 alterations emerged as a strong indicator of poor prognosis and can be used to stratify studies alone or in conjunction with other TSG alterations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信