男性患者报告的前列腺癌生殖系检测结果:来自PROGRESS Registry的结果。

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-19 DOI:10.1200/PO-25-00571
Stacy Loeb, Scott W Keith, Laura Gross, Rebecca L Hartman, Tomasz M Beer, Karina L Brierley, Heather H Cheng, Anna Couvillon, Adam P Dicker, Sue Friedman, Leonard G Gomella, Lawrence Karsh, William K Kelly, Costas D Lallas, Amy E Leader, Mark J Mann, James Ryan Mark, Patrick Mille, Channing J Paller, Huma Q Rana, Alexandra O Sokolova, Edouard J Trabulsi, Young E Whang, Veda N Giri
{"title":"男性患者报告的前列腺癌生殖系检测结果:来自PROGRESS Registry的结果。","authors":"Stacy Loeb, Scott W Keith, Laura Gross, Rebecca L Hartman, Tomasz M Beer, Karina L Brierley, Heather H Cheng, Anna Couvillon, Adam P Dicker, Sue Friedman, Leonard G Gomella, Lawrence Karsh, William K Kelly, Costas D Lallas, Amy E Leader, Mark J Mann, James Ryan Mark, Patrick Mille, Channing J Paller, Huma Q Rana, Alexandra O Sokolova, Edouard J Trabulsi, Young E Whang, Veda N Giri","doi":"10.1200/PO-25-00571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prostate cancer (PCA) germline testing (GT) informs precision therapy, cancer screening, and hereditary cancer risk for patients and families. To support patient-centered PCA GT, studying patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is essential.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PROGRESS was a national patient-driven registry (January 2021-April 2022) for English-speaking males older than 18 years with previous/current PCA GT and Internet access. Surveys collected demographics, PCA history, family cancer history, mode of genetics care delivery, satisfaction with genetic counseling, decisional conflict, cancer genetics knowledge, and attitudes toward GT. Multiple linear regression modeling was used to estimate and draw inferences (α = .05) on strength of relationships between participant characteristics and PROs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses focused on 414 participants: White (88%), Black (3%), Asian (6%), and mixed/other (3%). Most participants were non-Hispanic (95.2%) and 46.9% had PCA. Genetic results were positive (pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants; mutations) in 27.9%. The three most common modes of genetics care were meeting with genetics professional (in-person or remotely; 30.9%), discussing with doctor (21.1%), and using website (20.8%). In covariate-adjusted models, satisfaction scores were highest with pretest counseling by phone (β = 1.31; 95% CI, 0.26 to 2.36) or discussion with doctor (β = 1.25; 95% CI, 0.38 to 2.12). Lower decisional conflict scores were reported for pretest counseling by phone (β = -3.76; 95% CI, -7.28 to -0.24). Males with mutations reported higher GT benefit scores (β = .30; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.59) and importance of GT (β = .34; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.61). Asian Americans reported lower GT satisfaction (β = -2.91; 95% CI, -4.34 to -1.48) and higher decisional conflict (β = 8.93; 95% CI, 4.36 to 13.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PROGRESS Registry informs the first comprehensive report of PROs among males undergoing PCA GT, providing insights into opportunities to improve patient experience and leverage the benefit of GT.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2500571"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12462908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-Reported Outcomes From Males Regarding Germline Testing for Prostate Cancer: Results From the PROGRESS Registry.\",\"authors\":\"Stacy Loeb, Scott W Keith, Laura Gross, Rebecca L Hartman, Tomasz M Beer, Karina L Brierley, Heather H Cheng, Anna Couvillon, Adam P Dicker, Sue Friedman, Leonard G Gomella, Lawrence Karsh, William K Kelly, Costas D Lallas, Amy E Leader, Mark J Mann, James Ryan Mark, Patrick Mille, Channing J Paller, Huma Q Rana, Alexandra O Sokolova, Edouard J Trabulsi, Young E Whang, Veda N Giri\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/PO-25-00571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prostate cancer (PCA) germline testing (GT) informs precision therapy, cancer screening, and hereditary cancer risk for patients and families. To support patient-centered PCA GT, studying patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is essential.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PROGRESS was a national patient-driven registry (January 2021-April 2022) for English-speaking males older than 18 years with previous/current PCA GT and Internet access. Surveys collected demographics, PCA history, family cancer history, mode of genetics care delivery, satisfaction with genetic counseling, decisional conflict, cancer genetics knowledge, and attitudes toward GT. Multiple linear regression modeling was used to estimate and draw inferences (α = .05) on strength of relationships between participant characteristics and PROs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses focused on 414 participants: White (88%), Black (3%), Asian (6%), and mixed/other (3%). Most participants were non-Hispanic (95.2%) and 46.9% had PCA. Genetic results were positive (pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants; mutations) in 27.9%. The three most common modes of genetics care were meeting with genetics professional (in-person or remotely; 30.9%), discussing with doctor (21.1%), and using website (20.8%). In covariate-adjusted models, satisfaction scores were highest with pretest counseling by phone (β = 1.31; 95% CI, 0.26 to 2.36) or discussion with doctor (β = 1.25; 95% CI, 0.38 to 2.12). Lower decisional conflict scores were reported for pretest counseling by phone (β = -3.76; 95% CI, -7.28 to -0.24). Males with mutations reported higher GT benefit scores (β = .30; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.59) and importance of GT (β = .34; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.61). Asian Americans reported lower GT satisfaction (β = -2.91; 95% CI, -4.34 to -1.48) and higher decisional conflict (β = 8.93; 95% CI, 4.36 to 13.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PROGRESS Registry informs the first comprehensive report of PROs among males undergoing PCA GT, providing insights into opportunities to improve patient experience and leverage the benefit of GT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"e2500571\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12462908/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-25-00571\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-25-00571","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:前列腺癌(PCA)生殖系检测(GT)为患者和家庭提供精确治疗、癌症筛查和遗传性癌症风险的信息。为了支持以患者为中心的PCA GT,研究患者报告的结果(PROs)是必不可少的。方法:PROGRESS是一项全国性的患者驱动登记(2021年1月- 2022年4月),针对年龄在18岁以上、既往/当前有PCA GT和互联网接入的英语男性。调查收集了人口统计学、PCA史、家族癌症史、遗传护理提供模式、遗传咨询满意度、决策冲突、癌症遗传学知识和对GT的态度。使用多元线性回归模型估计和推断参与者特征与PROs之间的关系强度(α = 0.05)。结果:分析集中在414名参与者:白人(88%),黑人(3%),亚洲人(6%)和混合/其他(3%)。大多数参与者是非西班牙裔(95.2%),46.9%患有PCA。遗传结果为阳性(致病性/可能致病性变异;突变)的占27.9%。最常见的三种遗传学护理方式是与遗传学专家会面(面对面或远程;30.9%)、与医生讨论(21.1%)和使用网站(20.8%)。在协变量调整模型中,通过电话咨询(β = 1.31; 95% CI, 0.26至2.36)或与医生讨论(β = 1.25; 95% CI, 0.38至2.12)的满意度得分最高。通过电话进行测试前咨询的决策冲突得分较低(β = -3.76; 95% CI, -7.28至-0.24)。突变的男性报告了更高的GT获益评分(β = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.02至0.59)和GT重要性(β = 0.34, 95% CI, 0.08至0.61)。亚裔美国人报告较低的GT满意度(β = -2.91; 95% CI, -4.34至-1.48)和较高的决策冲突(β = 8.93; 95% CI, 4.36至13.51)。结论:PROGRESS Registry发布了第一份关于男性接受PCA GT的pro的综合报告,提供了改善患者体验和利用GT益处的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient-Reported Outcomes From Males Regarding Germline Testing for Prostate Cancer: Results From the PROGRESS Registry.

Purpose: Prostate cancer (PCA) germline testing (GT) informs precision therapy, cancer screening, and hereditary cancer risk for patients and families. To support patient-centered PCA GT, studying patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is essential.

Methods: PROGRESS was a national patient-driven registry (January 2021-April 2022) for English-speaking males older than 18 years with previous/current PCA GT and Internet access. Surveys collected demographics, PCA history, family cancer history, mode of genetics care delivery, satisfaction with genetic counseling, decisional conflict, cancer genetics knowledge, and attitudes toward GT. Multiple linear regression modeling was used to estimate and draw inferences (α = .05) on strength of relationships between participant characteristics and PROs.

Results: Analyses focused on 414 participants: White (88%), Black (3%), Asian (6%), and mixed/other (3%). Most participants were non-Hispanic (95.2%) and 46.9% had PCA. Genetic results were positive (pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants; mutations) in 27.9%. The three most common modes of genetics care were meeting with genetics professional (in-person or remotely; 30.9%), discussing with doctor (21.1%), and using website (20.8%). In covariate-adjusted models, satisfaction scores were highest with pretest counseling by phone (β = 1.31; 95% CI, 0.26 to 2.36) or discussion with doctor (β = 1.25; 95% CI, 0.38 to 2.12). Lower decisional conflict scores were reported for pretest counseling by phone (β = -3.76; 95% CI, -7.28 to -0.24). Males with mutations reported higher GT benefit scores (β = .30; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.59) and importance of GT (β = .34; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.61). Asian Americans reported lower GT satisfaction (β = -2.91; 95% CI, -4.34 to -1.48) and higher decisional conflict (β = 8.93; 95% CI, 4.36 to 13.51).

Conclusion: PROGRESS Registry informs the first comprehensive report of PROs among males undergoing PCA GT, providing insights into opportunities to improve patient experience and leverage the benefit of GT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信