地理空间差异、卫生系统因素和乳腺癌护理质量。

IF 4.1 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Michael J Hassett, Angela C Tramontano, Hajime Uno, Debra P Ritzwoller, Rinaa S Punglia
{"title":"地理空间差异、卫生系统因素和乳腺癌护理质量。","authors":"Michael J Hassett, Angela C Tramontano, Hajime Uno, Debra P Ritzwoller, Rinaa S Punglia","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite longstanding efforts to improve breast cancer care quality, wide performance gaps persist. We sought to identify regions demonstrating meaningfully low performance and characterize health-system and health-profession factors associated with geospatial disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database and the Health Resources and Services Administration area health resource file to characterize performance across healthcare service areas using four metrics: diagnosis stage, chemotherapy, radiation, and endocrine therapy. We used principal component analysis to identify healthcare facility and provider characteristics associated with performance; and hierarchical multivariable modeling to attribute total variance proportionally to five domains: patient characteristics, health service area region, healthcare facility and provider characteristics, randomness, and unexplained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 31,571 women aged 66-79 diagnosed 2007-2013 with stage I-III breast cancer and treated with surgery, 61% had stage 1 disease, 23% received chemotherapy, 54% received radiation therapy, and 42% received endocrine therapy. Health system factors explained more variance for endocrine therapy (21%), chemotherapy (12%), and radiation therapy (12%), compared to geospatial region or patient characteristics. Health profession-factors were associated with quality for stage, radiation therapy and chemotherapy; healthcare facility-factors were associated with quality for stage, endocrine therapy, and chemotherapy. Patient characteristics explained <5% of observed variance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reassuringly, only a small number of regions demonstrated suboptimal breast cancer care. Optimal performance was associated with multidisciplinary teams and facilities with robust resources and higher volumes. Incorporating geospatial and health system factors into quality measurement efforts could foster the design of impactful quality improvement programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geospatial disparities, health system factors, and breast cancer care quality.\",\"authors\":\"Michael J Hassett, Angela C Tramontano, Hajime Uno, Debra P Ritzwoller, Rinaa S Punglia\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jncics/pkaf089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite longstanding efforts to improve breast cancer care quality, wide performance gaps persist. We sought to identify regions demonstrating meaningfully low performance and characterize health-system and health-profession factors associated with geospatial disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database and the Health Resources and Services Administration area health resource file to characterize performance across healthcare service areas using four metrics: diagnosis stage, chemotherapy, radiation, and endocrine therapy. We used principal component analysis to identify healthcare facility and provider characteristics associated with performance; and hierarchical multivariable modeling to attribute total variance proportionally to five domains: patient characteristics, health service area region, healthcare facility and provider characteristics, randomness, and unexplained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 31,571 women aged 66-79 diagnosed 2007-2013 with stage I-III breast cancer and treated with surgery, 61% had stage 1 disease, 23% received chemotherapy, 54% received radiation therapy, and 42% received endocrine therapy. Health system factors explained more variance for endocrine therapy (21%), chemotherapy (12%), and radiation therapy (12%), compared to geospatial region or patient characteristics. Health profession-factors were associated with quality for stage, radiation therapy and chemotherapy; healthcare facility-factors were associated with quality for stage, endocrine therapy, and chemotherapy. Patient characteristics explained <5% of observed variance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reassuringly, only a small number of regions demonstrated suboptimal breast cancer care. Optimal performance was associated with multidisciplinary teams and facilities with robust resources and higher volumes. Incorporating geospatial and health system factors into quality measurement efforts could foster the design of impactful quality improvement programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管长期以来努力提高乳腺癌护理质量,但仍然存在很大的绩效差距。我们试图确定表现出有意义的低绩效的地区,并描述与地理空间差异相关的卫生系统和卫生专业因素。方法:我们使用监测、流行病学和最终结果-医疗保险关联数据库以及卫生资源和服务管理局区域卫生资源文件,通过四个指标(诊断阶段、化疗、放疗和内分泌治疗)来描述医疗保健服务区域的绩效。我们使用主成分分析来确定与绩效相关的医疗机构和提供者特征;通过分层多变量建模,将总方差按比例归为5个域:患者特征、卫生服务区域、医疗机构和提供者特征、随机性和不可解释性。结果:在2007-2013年诊断为I-III期乳腺癌并接受手术治疗的31,571名66-79岁女性中,61%为1期疾病,23%接受化疗,54%接受放射治疗,42%接受内分泌治疗。与地理空间区域或患者特征相比,卫生系统因素解释了内分泌治疗(21%)、化疗(12%)和放射治疗(12%)的更多差异。卫生专业因素与分期、放疗和化疗质量相关;医疗设施因素与分期、内分泌治疗和化疗质量相关。结论:令人欣慰的是,只有少数地区表现出不理想的乳腺癌治疗。最佳性能与多学科团队和拥有强大资源和更高容量的设施有关。将地理空间和卫生系统因素纳入质量测量工作可以促进有效质量改进方案的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Geospatial disparities, health system factors, and breast cancer care quality.

Background: Despite longstanding efforts to improve breast cancer care quality, wide performance gaps persist. We sought to identify regions demonstrating meaningfully low performance and characterize health-system and health-profession factors associated with geospatial disparities.

Methods: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database and the Health Resources and Services Administration area health resource file to characterize performance across healthcare service areas using four metrics: diagnosis stage, chemotherapy, radiation, and endocrine therapy. We used principal component analysis to identify healthcare facility and provider characteristics associated with performance; and hierarchical multivariable modeling to attribute total variance proportionally to five domains: patient characteristics, health service area region, healthcare facility and provider characteristics, randomness, and unexplained.

Results: Among 31,571 women aged 66-79 diagnosed 2007-2013 with stage I-III breast cancer and treated with surgery, 61% had stage 1 disease, 23% received chemotherapy, 54% received radiation therapy, and 42% received endocrine therapy. Health system factors explained more variance for endocrine therapy (21%), chemotherapy (12%), and radiation therapy (12%), compared to geospatial region or patient characteristics. Health profession-factors were associated with quality for stage, radiation therapy and chemotherapy; healthcare facility-factors were associated with quality for stage, endocrine therapy, and chemotherapy. Patient characteristics explained <5% of observed variance.

Conclusions: Reassuringly, only a small number of regions demonstrated suboptimal breast cancer care. Optimal performance was associated with multidisciplinary teams and facilities with robust resources and higher volumes. Incorporating geospatial and health system factors into quality measurement efforts could foster the design of impactful quality improvement programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信