Aliisa Auvinen, Panu Aaltonen, Harri Mustonen, Caj Haglund, Pauli Puolakkainen, Hanna Seppänen
{"title":"血管紧张素受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂在胃癌患者中的使用和生存:芬兰全国队列研究","authors":"Aliisa Auvinen, Panu Aaltonen, Harri Mustonen, Caj Haglund, Pauli Puolakkainen, Hanna Seppänen","doi":"10.1007/s10120-025-01662-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been increasingly recognized to be associated with carcinogenesis and cancer progression. There is extensive preclinical evidence suggesting the benefits of RAS-inhibiting drugs, such as angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), in preventing the progression of gastric cancer (GC). However, clinical evidence supporting the positive effects of ARBs and ACEIs on GC prognosis is currently limited. The purpose of this study is to investigate their effects in a Finnish cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective national cohort study, where cancer patient registry data were linked to prescription purchase records for ARBs and ACEIs. The effect of ARB/ACEI in the post-diagnostic period on overall mortality was assessed using Cox regression analysis. Disease-specific mortality associations were evaluated with the Fine and Gray model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 2246 histologically confirmed GC patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2016. Follow-up continued until the end of 2023. In the main analysis, a protective effect of ARB use was associated with a significant reduction in overall mortality (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.94, p = 0.007). Furthermore, the effect was greater for those with higher ARB dosage. A similar finding was not observed with ACEI use. For disease-specific survival, both ARB and ACEI use had a significant protective effect (adjusted HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62-0.90 p = 0.002 and adjusted HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63-0.93, P = 0.007, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study adds to the evidence that ARB use might have a beneficial impact on survival among GC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12684,"journal":{"name":"Gastric Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Angiotensin receptor blocker and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use and survival in gastric cancer patients: a Finnish nationwide cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Aliisa Auvinen, Panu Aaltonen, Harri Mustonen, Caj Haglund, Pauli Puolakkainen, Hanna Seppänen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10120-025-01662-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been increasingly recognized to be associated with carcinogenesis and cancer progression. There is extensive preclinical evidence suggesting the benefits of RAS-inhibiting drugs, such as angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), in preventing the progression of gastric cancer (GC). However, clinical evidence supporting the positive effects of ARBs and ACEIs on GC prognosis is currently limited. The purpose of this study is to investigate their effects in a Finnish cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective national cohort study, where cancer patient registry data were linked to prescription purchase records for ARBs and ACEIs. The effect of ARB/ACEI in the post-diagnostic period on overall mortality was assessed using Cox regression analysis. Disease-specific mortality associations were evaluated with the Fine and Gray model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 2246 histologically confirmed GC patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2016. Follow-up continued until the end of 2023. In the main analysis, a protective effect of ARB use was associated with a significant reduction in overall mortality (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.94, p = 0.007). Furthermore, the effect was greater for those with higher ARB dosage. A similar finding was not observed with ACEI use. For disease-specific survival, both ARB and ACEI use had a significant protective effect (adjusted HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62-0.90 p = 0.002 and adjusted HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63-0.93, P = 0.007, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study adds to the evidence that ARB use might have a beneficial impact on survival among GC patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastric Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastric Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-025-01662-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastric Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-025-01662-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)已被越来越多地认识到与癌症发生和癌症进展有关。有广泛的临床前证据表明ras抑制药物,如血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs),在预防胃癌(GC)进展方面的益处。然而,目前支持arb和ACEIs对胃癌预后积极作用的临床证据有限。本研究的目的是调查它们在芬兰队列中的影响。方法:这是一项回顾性国家队列研究,其中癌症患者登记数据与arb和acei的处方购买记录相关联。采用Cox回归分析评估诊断后ARB/ACEI对总死亡率的影响。用Fine和Gray模型评估疾病特异性死亡率的关联。结果:我们纳入了2011年至2016年诊断的2246例组织学证实的胃癌患者。后续工作一直持续到2023年底。在主要分析中,使用ARB的保护作用与总体死亡率的显著降低相关(校正风险比(HR) 0.81, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.69-0.94, p = 0.007)。此外,ARB剂量越高,效果越明显。使用ACEI时没有观察到类似的结果。对于疾病特异性生存,ARB和ACEI的使用均具有显著的保护作用(调整后的HR分别为0.75,95% CI 0.62-0.90 p = 0.002和调整后的HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63-0.93, p = 0.007)。结论:我们的研究进一步证明,ARB的使用可能对胃癌患者的生存有有益的影响。
Angiotensin receptor blocker and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use and survival in gastric cancer patients: a Finnish nationwide cohort study.
Background: The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been increasingly recognized to be associated with carcinogenesis and cancer progression. There is extensive preclinical evidence suggesting the benefits of RAS-inhibiting drugs, such as angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), in preventing the progression of gastric cancer (GC). However, clinical evidence supporting the positive effects of ARBs and ACEIs on GC prognosis is currently limited. The purpose of this study is to investigate their effects in a Finnish cohort.
Methods: This is a retrospective national cohort study, where cancer patient registry data were linked to prescription purchase records for ARBs and ACEIs. The effect of ARB/ACEI in the post-diagnostic period on overall mortality was assessed using Cox regression analysis. Disease-specific mortality associations were evaluated with the Fine and Gray model.
Results: We included 2246 histologically confirmed GC patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2016. Follow-up continued until the end of 2023. In the main analysis, a protective effect of ARB use was associated with a significant reduction in overall mortality (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.94, p = 0.007). Furthermore, the effect was greater for those with higher ARB dosage. A similar finding was not observed with ACEI use. For disease-specific survival, both ARB and ACEI use had a significant protective effect (adjusted HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62-0.90 p = 0.002 and adjusted HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63-0.93, P = 0.007, respectively).
Conclusions: Our study adds to the evidence that ARB use might have a beneficial impact on survival among GC patients.
期刊介绍:
Gastric Cancer is an esteemed global forum that focuses on various aspects of gastric cancer research, treatment, and biology worldwide.
The journal promotes a diverse range of content, including original articles, case reports, short communications, and technical notes. It also welcomes Letters to the Editor discussing published articles or sharing viewpoints on gastric cancer topics.
Review articles are predominantly sought after by the Editor, ensuring comprehensive coverage of the field.
With a dedicated and knowledgeable editorial team, the journal is committed to providing exceptional support and ensuring high levels of author satisfaction. In fact, over 90% of published authors have expressed their intent to publish again in our esteemed journal.