脉冲持续时间对心脏电穿孔的影响:纳秒脉冲增强心肌细胞的选择性并促进拉曼检测向凋亡细胞死亡的转变。

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Europace Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1093/europace/euaf217
Pamela W Sowa, Aleksandra Mariyanats, Aleksander Kiełbik, Anne-Katrin Rohlfing, Vitalij Novickij, Ferdinand Kollotzek, Manuel Sigle, Julia Marzi, Katja Schenke-Layland, Oliver Borst, Meinrad P Gawaz
{"title":"脉冲持续时间对心脏电穿孔的影响:纳秒脉冲增强心肌细胞的选择性并促进拉曼检测向凋亡细胞死亡的转变。","authors":"Pamela W Sowa, Aleksandra Mariyanats, Aleksander Kiełbik, Anne-Katrin Rohlfing, Vitalij Novickij, Ferdinand Kollotzek, Manuel Sigle, Julia Marzi, Katja Schenke-Layland, Oliver Borst, Meinrad P Gawaz","doi":"10.1093/europace/euaf217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Pulsed field ablation (PFA), a cardiac ablation technique using microsecond pulsed electric fields (µsPEF), is widely used in clinical settings, while nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEF) have recently entered clinical trials. Selective ablation of cardiomyocytes over endothelial cells is critical to prevent adverse remodelling, arrhythmias, and thrombosis, yet comparative data on nsPEF vs. µsPEF remain limited. This study investigates the cytotoxic effects and cell death mechanisms induced by nsPEF and µsPEF in cardiac and endothelial cells.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Human cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells were exposed to varying electric field intensities with nsPEF and µsPEF using custom-built automated setup to assess permeabilization and cell death. Raman spectroscopy evaluated biochemical changes in cardiomyocytes following electroporation. Ex vivo epicardial ablation was performed on murine hearts using customized electrodes. Maximal cardiomyocyte death occurred 24 h after both pulse types in vitro. Ex vivo, both pulse types produced visible myocardial lesions as early as 1 h post-exposure, with lesion size progressively increasing up to 4 h. Microsecond pulsed electric fields induced significantly greater endothelial damage (ED50: 1.18 kV/cm) than damage to cardiomyocytes (ED50: 1.28 kV/cm), whereas nsPEF affected both cell types equally (ED50: 7.27 kV/cm vs. 7.24 kV/cm). Raman spectroscopy analysis of exposed cells indicated that µsPEF predominantly triggered necrotic or unregulated cell death, while nsPEF exposure was associated with regulated, apoptotic cell death.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pulse duration critically determines electroporation selectivity and downstream death pathways. Nanosecond pulsed electric fields favoured regulated cell death and cardiomyocyte selectivity, highlighting its potential to improve the safety and durability of PFA.</p>","PeriodicalId":11981,"journal":{"name":"Europace","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481159/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of pulse duration on cardiac electroporation: nanosecond pulses enhance cardiomyocyte selectivity and promote a Raman-detected shift towards apoptotic cell death.\",\"authors\":\"Pamela W Sowa, Aleksandra Mariyanats, Aleksander Kiełbik, Anne-Katrin Rohlfing, Vitalij Novickij, Ferdinand Kollotzek, Manuel Sigle, Julia Marzi, Katja Schenke-Layland, Oliver Borst, Meinrad P Gawaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/europace/euaf217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Pulsed field ablation (PFA), a cardiac ablation technique using microsecond pulsed electric fields (µsPEF), is widely used in clinical settings, while nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEF) have recently entered clinical trials. Selective ablation of cardiomyocytes over endothelial cells is critical to prevent adverse remodelling, arrhythmias, and thrombosis, yet comparative data on nsPEF vs. µsPEF remain limited. This study investigates the cytotoxic effects and cell death mechanisms induced by nsPEF and µsPEF in cardiac and endothelial cells.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Human cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells were exposed to varying electric field intensities with nsPEF and µsPEF using custom-built automated setup to assess permeabilization and cell death. Raman spectroscopy evaluated biochemical changes in cardiomyocytes following electroporation. Ex vivo epicardial ablation was performed on murine hearts using customized electrodes. Maximal cardiomyocyte death occurred 24 h after both pulse types in vitro. Ex vivo, both pulse types produced visible myocardial lesions as early as 1 h post-exposure, with lesion size progressively increasing up to 4 h. Microsecond pulsed electric fields induced significantly greater endothelial damage (ED50: 1.18 kV/cm) than damage to cardiomyocytes (ED50: 1.28 kV/cm), whereas nsPEF affected both cell types equally (ED50: 7.27 kV/cm vs. 7.24 kV/cm). Raman spectroscopy analysis of exposed cells indicated that µsPEF predominantly triggered necrotic or unregulated cell death, while nsPEF exposure was associated with regulated, apoptotic cell death.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pulse duration critically determines electroporation selectivity and downstream death pathways. Nanosecond pulsed electric fields favoured regulated cell death and cardiomyocyte selectivity, highlighting its potential to improve the safety and durability of PFA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Europace\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481159/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Europace\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf217\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europace","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf217","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脉冲场消融(PFA)是一种使用微秒脉冲电场(µsPEF)的心脏消融技术,在临床中应用广泛,而纳秒脉冲电场(nsPEF)最近进入临床试验。选择性消融内皮细胞上的心肌细胞对于预防不良重塑、心律失常和血栓形成至关重要,但nsPEF与µsPEF的比较数据仍然有限。本研究探讨了nsPEF和µsPEF对心脏和内皮细胞的细胞毒性作用和细胞死亡机制。方法:使用定制的自动化装置,将人心肌细胞和内皮细胞暴露于不同电场强度的nsPEF和µsPEF下,以评估细胞通透性和细胞死亡。拉曼光谱评价电穿孔后心肌细胞的生化变化。使用定制电极对小鼠心脏进行体外心外膜消融。结果:心肌细胞最大死亡均发生在离体24小时。在离体试验中,两种脉冲类型均可在暴露后1小时内产生可见的心肌病变,病变大小逐渐增大至4小时。µsPEF诱导的内皮细胞损伤(ED50: 1.18 kV/cm)明显大于心肌细胞损伤(ED50: 1.28 kV/cm),而nsPEF对两种细胞类型的影响相同(ED50: 7.27 kV/cm vs. 7.24 kV/cm)。暴露细胞的拉曼光谱分析表明,µsPEF主要引发坏死或不受调节的细胞死亡,而nsPEF暴露与受调节的凋亡细胞死亡有关。结论:脉冲持续时间决定了电穿孔选择性和下游死亡途径。nsPEF有利于调节细胞死亡和心肌细胞的选择性,突出了其提高PFA安全性和持久性的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of pulse duration on cardiac electroporation: nanosecond pulses enhance cardiomyocyte selectivity and promote a Raman-detected shift towards apoptotic cell death.

Aims: Pulsed field ablation (PFA), a cardiac ablation technique using microsecond pulsed electric fields (µsPEF), is widely used in clinical settings, while nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEF) have recently entered clinical trials. Selective ablation of cardiomyocytes over endothelial cells is critical to prevent adverse remodelling, arrhythmias, and thrombosis, yet comparative data on nsPEF vs. µsPEF remain limited. This study investigates the cytotoxic effects and cell death mechanisms induced by nsPEF and µsPEF in cardiac and endothelial cells.

Methods and results: Human cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells were exposed to varying electric field intensities with nsPEF and µsPEF using custom-built automated setup to assess permeabilization and cell death. Raman spectroscopy evaluated biochemical changes in cardiomyocytes following electroporation. Ex vivo epicardial ablation was performed on murine hearts using customized electrodes. Maximal cardiomyocyte death occurred 24 h after both pulse types in vitro. Ex vivo, both pulse types produced visible myocardial lesions as early as 1 h post-exposure, with lesion size progressively increasing up to 4 h. Microsecond pulsed electric fields induced significantly greater endothelial damage (ED50: 1.18 kV/cm) than damage to cardiomyocytes (ED50: 1.28 kV/cm), whereas nsPEF affected both cell types equally (ED50: 7.27 kV/cm vs. 7.24 kV/cm). Raman spectroscopy analysis of exposed cells indicated that µsPEF predominantly triggered necrotic or unregulated cell death, while nsPEF exposure was associated with regulated, apoptotic cell death.

Conclusion: Pulse duration critically determines electroporation selectivity and downstream death pathways. Nanosecond pulsed electric fields favoured regulated cell death and cardiomyocyte selectivity, highlighting its potential to improve the safety and durability of PFA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Europace
Europace 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
851
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: EP - Europace - European Journal of Pacing, Arrhythmias and Cardiac Electrophysiology of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to provide an avenue of communication of top quality European and international original scientific work and reviews in the fields of Arrhythmias, Pacing and Cellular Electrophysiology. The Journal offers the reader a collection of contemporary original peer-reviewed papers, invited papers and editorial comments together with book reviews and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信