脊椎动物的种子传播增加了南部非洲草原生物群落的入侵风险

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
L. R. Vukeya, T. M. Mokotjomela, N. Pillay
{"title":"脊椎动物的种子传播增加了南部非洲草原生物群落的入侵风险","authors":"L. R. Vukeya,&nbsp;T. M. Mokotjomela,&nbsp;N. Pillay","doi":"10.1007/s10661-025-14569-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Vertebrate-mediated seed dispersal plays a crucial role in enabling the spread of invasive alien plants that threaten biodiversity in ecosystems such as the southern African grassland biome. Understanding the dynamics of the seed dispersal process by animals is important for assessing invasion risk and designing management interventions. This study investigated whether the southern African grassland biome is vulnerable to future plant invasions facilitated by frugivorous vertebrates in two known plant invasion hotspots in the Free State province: Boshof, dominated by <i>Opuntia engelmannii</i> (Cactaceae), and Fouriesburg, invaded by <i>Pyracantha angustifolia</i> (Rosaceae). We (1) monitored, documented, and compared the diversity of dispersal vector species in sites invaded by non-native woody and cactus species with non-invaded sites; (2) quantified the seed rain from vertebrates’ faecal samples and classified seeds and disperser species into functional groups to identify drivers of plant invasion of the grassland biome; and (3) assessed the effectiveness of vertebrate-mediated seed dispersal by measuring their post-ingestion viability. We predicted that frugivorous vertebrates are key drivers of fleshy-fruited plant invasions in this biome. We found taxonomically diverse dispersers (i.e. 27 families), with Bovidae and Numididae being dominant. Overall vector species diversity was high (<i>H</i> &gt; 3.0), assuring effective population recruitment, although moderate in invaded sites (<i>H</i> &gt; 2.5), and lower in non-invaded sites (<i>H</i> &lt; 2.5). Over 9 months (March–November 2024), mammals dominated dispersal services (74%; <i>N</i> = 328 visits), followed by birds (26%), supporting our study prediction. We noted a high seed rain (i.e. 107,031 seeds) collected from 11,295 faecal samples associated with 43 vertebrate species. Invaded sites experienced significantly higher seed rain than non-invaded sites (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and were dominantly comprised of non-native species. Many seeds were medium-sized (1–5 mm), typical for successful invaders, and had a hard seed coat. Germination trials showed that ingested <i>P. angustifolia</i> seeds retained viability (46.7 ± 8.61%), similar to de-pulped controls (<i>P</i> = 0.53), while <i>O. engelmannii</i> seeds significantly lost viability (<i>P</i> = 0.002). The predicted seed dispersal distances were greater than 15.7 km for birds and ranged between 1.7 km and 8.6 km for mammals. We concluded that the grassland biome is vulnerable to further invasion by non-native plants dispersed by vertebrates, coupled with their long dispersal distances, and that integrating management of dispersal pathways into control plans is essential to optimise control efforts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"197 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-025-14569-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seed dispersal by vertebrates promotes invasion risk in the southern African grassland biome\",\"authors\":\"L. R. Vukeya,&nbsp;T. M. Mokotjomela,&nbsp;N. Pillay\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10661-025-14569-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Vertebrate-mediated seed dispersal plays a crucial role in enabling the spread of invasive alien plants that threaten biodiversity in ecosystems such as the southern African grassland biome. Understanding the dynamics of the seed dispersal process by animals is important for assessing invasion risk and designing management interventions. This study investigated whether the southern African grassland biome is vulnerable to future plant invasions facilitated by frugivorous vertebrates in two known plant invasion hotspots in the Free State province: Boshof, dominated by <i>Opuntia engelmannii</i> (Cactaceae), and Fouriesburg, invaded by <i>Pyracantha angustifolia</i> (Rosaceae). We (1) monitored, documented, and compared the diversity of dispersal vector species in sites invaded by non-native woody and cactus species with non-invaded sites; (2) quantified the seed rain from vertebrates’ faecal samples and classified seeds and disperser species into functional groups to identify drivers of plant invasion of the grassland biome; and (3) assessed the effectiveness of vertebrate-mediated seed dispersal by measuring their post-ingestion viability. We predicted that frugivorous vertebrates are key drivers of fleshy-fruited plant invasions in this biome. We found taxonomically diverse dispersers (i.e. 27 families), with Bovidae and Numididae being dominant. Overall vector species diversity was high (<i>H</i> &gt; 3.0), assuring effective population recruitment, although moderate in invaded sites (<i>H</i> &gt; 2.5), and lower in non-invaded sites (<i>H</i> &lt; 2.5). Over 9 months (March–November 2024), mammals dominated dispersal services (74%; <i>N</i> = 328 visits), followed by birds (26%), supporting our study prediction. We noted a high seed rain (i.e. 107,031 seeds) collected from 11,295 faecal samples associated with 43 vertebrate species. Invaded sites experienced significantly higher seed rain than non-invaded sites (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and were dominantly comprised of non-native species. Many seeds were medium-sized (1–5 mm), typical for successful invaders, and had a hard seed coat. Germination trials showed that ingested <i>P. angustifolia</i> seeds retained viability (46.7 ± 8.61%), similar to de-pulped controls (<i>P</i> = 0.53), while <i>O. engelmannii</i> seeds significantly lost viability (<i>P</i> = 0.002). The predicted seed dispersal distances were greater than 15.7 km for birds and ranged between 1.7 km and 8.6 km for mammals. We concluded that the grassland biome is vulnerable to further invasion by non-native plants dispersed by vertebrates, coupled with their long dispersal distances, and that integrating management of dispersal pathways into control plans is essential to optimise control efforts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment\",\"volume\":\"197 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-025-14569-3.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-025-14569-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-025-14569-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脊椎动物介导的种子传播在外来入侵植物的传播中起着至关重要的作用,这些外来入侵植物威胁着南部非洲草原生物群落等生态系统的生物多样性。了解动物种子传播过程的动态对评估入侵风险和设计管理干预措施具有重要意义。本研究在自由邦省两个已知的植物入侵热点地区(以仙人掌科Opuntia engelmannii为主的Boshof和以玫瑰科Pyracantha angustifolia为主的Fouriesburg)调查了南部非洲草地生物群落是否容易受到果食性脊椎动物的入侵。我们(1)监测、记录和比较了外来木本和仙人掌入侵地与非入侵地传播媒介物种的多样性;(2)对脊椎动物粪便种子雨进行量化,并对种子和传播者物种进行功能类群划分,以确定植物入侵草原生物群系的驱动因素;(3)通过测量脊椎动物食后的生存能力来评估脊椎动物介导的种子传播效果。我们预测,果食性脊椎动物是肉果植物入侵的关键驱动因素。分布种类多样,有27科,以牛科和努米科为主。总体而言,病媒生物多样性较高(H > 3.0),保证了种群的有效补充,但在入侵地属中等水平(H > 2.5),而在非入侵地属较低水平(H > 2.5)。在9个月内(2024年3月- 11月),哺乳动物占主导地位(74%;N = 328次),其次是鸟类(26%),支持我们的研究预测。我们注意到从43种脊椎动物的11,295份粪便样本中收集到大量种子(即107,031颗种子)。入侵样地的种子雨显著高于非入侵样地(P < 0.001),且以非本地物种为主。许多种子中等大小(1-5毫米),典型的成功入侵者,有坚硬的种皮。发芽试验结果表明,与去浆对照组相比,食用后的种子仍能保持活力(46.7±8.61%),差异无统计学意义(P = 0.53),而未食用的种子则显著丧失活力(P = 0.002)。鸟类的种子传播距离大于15.7 km,哺乳动物的种子传播距离在1.7 km ~ 8.6 km之间。我们得出的结论是,草地生物群落容易受到脊椎动物传播的非本地植物的进一步入侵,加上它们的传播距离较长,并且将传播路径管理纳入控制计划对于优化控制工作至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seed dispersal by vertebrates promotes invasion risk in the southern African grassland biome

Vertebrate-mediated seed dispersal plays a crucial role in enabling the spread of invasive alien plants that threaten biodiversity in ecosystems such as the southern African grassland biome. Understanding the dynamics of the seed dispersal process by animals is important for assessing invasion risk and designing management interventions. This study investigated whether the southern African grassland biome is vulnerable to future plant invasions facilitated by frugivorous vertebrates in two known plant invasion hotspots in the Free State province: Boshof, dominated by Opuntia engelmannii (Cactaceae), and Fouriesburg, invaded by Pyracantha angustifolia (Rosaceae). We (1) monitored, documented, and compared the diversity of dispersal vector species in sites invaded by non-native woody and cactus species with non-invaded sites; (2) quantified the seed rain from vertebrates’ faecal samples and classified seeds and disperser species into functional groups to identify drivers of plant invasion of the grassland biome; and (3) assessed the effectiveness of vertebrate-mediated seed dispersal by measuring their post-ingestion viability. We predicted that frugivorous vertebrates are key drivers of fleshy-fruited plant invasions in this biome. We found taxonomically diverse dispersers (i.e. 27 families), with Bovidae and Numididae being dominant. Overall vector species diversity was high (H > 3.0), assuring effective population recruitment, although moderate in invaded sites (H > 2.5), and lower in non-invaded sites (H < 2.5). Over 9 months (March–November 2024), mammals dominated dispersal services (74%; N = 328 visits), followed by birds (26%), supporting our study prediction. We noted a high seed rain (i.e. 107,031 seeds) collected from 11,295 faecal samples associated with 43 vertebrate species. Invaded sites experienced significantly higher seed rain than non-invaded sites (P < 0.001) and were dominantly comprised of non-native species. Many seeds were medium-sized (1–5 mm), typical for successful invaders, and had a hard seed coat. Germination trials showed that ingested P. angustifolia seeds retained viability (46.7 ± 8.61%), similar to de-pulped controls (P = 0.53), while O. engelmannii seeds significantly lost viability (P = 0.002). The predicted seed dispersal distances were greater than 15.7 km for birds and ranged between 1.7 km and 8.6 km for mammals. We concluded that the grassland biome is vulnerable to further invasion by non-native plants dispersed by vertebrates, coupled with their long dispersal distances, and that integrating management of dispersal pathways into control plans is essential to optimise control efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信